* static tracepoints - sdt.h vs. lttng
@ 2016-09-06 23:39 Milian Wolff
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Milian Wolff @ 2016-09-06 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-perf-users
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 688 bytes --]
Hey all,
perf now has support for sdt.h static userland trace points, which is really
great. But I wonder, where can I find documentation on using it for custom
data types, like UTF16 strings, or custom structs? The Kernel seems to have
some custom API, can I leverage that also in userland?
The LTTNG-UST trace point API is much clearer in that regard:
http://lttng.org/man/3/lttng-ust/v2.7/
Which clearly supports arbitrary data types. But that is not supported by
perf, right?
How do other projects handle this?
Thanks
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-09-06 23:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-06 23:39 static tracepoints - sdt.h vs. lttng Milian Wolff
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.