[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[osstest service owner]

flight 100874 xtf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/

Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
 xtf                  b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3
baseline version:
 xtf                  97541e1fde20b6823fa146357a57ec7c6f802c05

Last test of basis   100870  2016-09-10 07:44:13 Z    0 days
Testing same since   100874  2016-09-10 12:13:11 Z    0 days    1 attempts

------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
  Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
  David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>

jobs:
 build-amd64-xtf                                              pass    
 build-amd64                                                  pass    
 build-amd64-pvops                                            pass    
 test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1                                       pass    
 test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2                                       pass    
 test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3                                       pass    
 test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4                                       pass    
 test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5                                       pass    


------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
logs: /home/logs/logs
images: /home/logs/images

Logs, config files, etc. are available at
    http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs

Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master

Test harness code can be found at
    http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary


Pushing revision :

+ branch=xtf
+ revision=b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3
+ . ./cri-lock-repos
++ . ./cri-common
+++ . ./cri-getconfig
+++ umask 002
+++ getrepos
++++ getconfig Repos
++++ perl -e '
                use Osstest;
                readglobalconfig();
                print $c{"Repos"} or die $!;
        '
+++ local repos=/home/osstest/repos
+++ '[' -z /home/osstest/repos ']'
+++ '[' '!' -d /home/osstest/repos ']'
+++ echo /home/osstest/repos
++ repos=/home/osstest/repos
++ repos_lock=/home/osstest/repos/lock
++ '[' x '!=' x/home/osstest/repos/lock ']'
++ OSSTEST_REPOS_LOCK_LOCKED=/home/osstest/repos/lock
++ exec with-lock-ex -w /home/osstest/repos/lock ./ap-push xtf b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3
+ branch=xtf
+ revision=b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3
+ . ./cri-lock-repos
++ . ./cri-common
+++ . ./cri-getconfig
+++ umask 002
+++ getrepos
++++ getconfig Repos
++++ perl -e '
                use Osstest;
                readglobalconfig();
                print $c{"Repos"} or die $!;
        '
+++ local repos=/home/osstest/repos
+++ '[' -z /home/osstest/repos ']'
+++ '[' '!' -d /home/osstest/repos ']'
+++ echo /home/osstest/repos
++ repos=/home/osstest/repos
++ repos_lock=/home/osstest/repos/lock
++ '[' x/home/osstest/repos/lock '!=' x/home/osstest/repos/lock ']'
+ . ./cri-common
++ . ./cri-getconfig
++ umask 002
+ select_xenbranch
+ case "$branch" in
+ tree=xtf
+ xenbranch=xen-unstable
+ '[' xxtf = xlinux ']'
+ linuxbranch=
+ '[' x = x ']'
+ qemuubranch=qemu-upstream-unstable
+ select_prevxenbranch
++ ./cri-getprevxenbranch xen-unstable
+ prevxenbranch=xen-4.7-testing
+ '[' xb5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3 = x ']'
+ : tested/2.6.39.x
+ . ./ap-common
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org
+++ getconfig OsstestUpstream
+++ perl -e '
                use Osstest;
                readglobalconfig();
                print $c{"OsstestUpstream"} or die $!;
        '
++ :
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xen.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
++ : git://git.kernel.org
++ : git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git
++ : git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/xtf.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xtf.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/xtf.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/libvirt.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/rumprun.git
++ : git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/rumprun.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/rumprun.git
++ : git://git.seabios.org/seabios.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/seabios.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/seabios.git
++ : https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/ovmf.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/osstest/ext/linux-firmware.git
++ : git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/linux-pvops.git
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
++ : tested/linux-3.14
++ : tested/linux-arm-xen
++ '[' xgit://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git = x ']'
++ '[' x = x ']'
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
++ : tested/linux-arm-xen
++ : git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
++ : tested/2.6.39.x
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : http://hg.uk.xensource.com/carbon/trunk/linux-2.6.27
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
++ : osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/qemu-xen.git
++ : daily-cron.xtf
++ : git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
++ : git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git
+ TREE_LINUX=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/linux-pvops.git
+ TREE_QEMU_UPSTREAM=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/qemu-xen.git
+ TREE_XEN=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xen.git
+ TREE_LIBVIRT=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/libvirt.git
+ TREE_RUMPRUN=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/rumprun.git
+ TREE_SEABIOS=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/seabios.git
+ TREE_OVMF=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/osstest/ovmf.git
+ TREE_XTF=osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xtf.git
+ info_linux_tree xtf
+ case $1 in
+ return 1
+ case "$branch" in
+ cd /home/osstest/repos/xtf
+ git push osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xtf.git b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3:refs/heads/xen-tested-master
To osstest@xenbits.xen.org:/home/xen/git/xtf.git
   97541e1..b5c5332  b5c5332de4268d33a6f8eadc1d17c7b9cf0e7dc3 -> xen-tested-master

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Ian Jackson]

osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> flight 100874 xtf real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/
> 
> Perfect :-)

Hooray.  I see this is running in xen-unstable now, as expected.

Just to check, are we expecting `xtf/test-pv64-xsa-167' to SKIP ?

The log says:
   PV superpage support not detected

I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing
build option or something ?

https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features suggests
that superpages are "supported" so it would be good to have this test
working.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Wei Liu]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > flight 100874 xtf real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/
> > 
> > Perfect :-)
> 
> Hooray.  I see this is running in xen-unstable now, as expected.
> 
> Just to check, are we expecting `xtf/test-pv64-xsa-167' to SKIP ?
> 

Yes.

> The log says:
>    PV superpage support not detected
> 
> I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing
> build option or something ?
> 
> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features suggests
> that superpages are "supported" so it would be good to have this test
> working.
> 

PV superpage is different from hvm superpage. Also that wiki page could
be referring to hv support, I'm not sure.

As far as I can tell, PV superpage is a feature that nobody uses except
for Oracle (?).

Wei.

> Thanks,
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 19.09.16 at 12:42, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> The log says:
>>    PV superpage support not detected
>> 
>> I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing
>> build option or something ?
>> 
>> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features suggests
>> that superpages are "supported" so it would be good to have this test
>> working.
>> 
> 
> PV superpage is different from hvm superpage. Also that wiki page could
> be referring to hv support, I'm not sure.

I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was
not given?

> As far as I can tell, PV superpage is a feature that nobody uses except
> for Oracle (?).

And even they half proposed removing the support, but that
proposal was never really brought into full life. Konrad?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Wei Liu]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.09.16 at 12:42, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> The log says:
> >>    PV superpage support not detected
> >> 
> >> I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing
> >> build option or something ?
> >> 
> >> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features suggests
> >> that superpages are "supported" so it would be good to have this test
> >> working.
> >> 
> > 
> > PV superpage is different from hvm superpage. Also that wiki page could
> > be referring to hv support, I'm not sure.
> 
> I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was
> not given?
> 

Correct, that option is not given in osstest.

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42:05AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > osstest service owner writes ("[xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > > flight 100874 xtf real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100874/
> > > 
> > > Perfect :-)
> > 
> > Hooray.  I see this is running in xen-unstable now, as expected.
> > 
> > Just to check, are we expecting `xtf/test-pv64-xsa-167' to SKIP ?
> > 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > The log says:
> >    PV superpage support not detected
> > 
> > I assume this is not a missing hardware feature, but rather a missing
> > build option or something ?
> > 
> > https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features suggests
> > that superpages are "supported" so it would be good to have this test
> > working.
> > 
> 
> PV superpage is different from hvm superpage. Also that wiki page could
> be referring to hv support, I'm not sure.
> 
> As far as I can tell, PV superpage is a feature that nobody uses except
> for Oracle (?).

We don't use it anymore either. I had a patch to rip it out but .. I need
to dust it off.

> 
> Wei.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Ian Jackson]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was
> > not given?
> 
> Correct, that option is not given in osstest.

It should be, in the XTF tests at least, perhaps ?

Unless we're proposing to rip the feature out in stable branches.

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> We don't use it anymore either. I had a patch to rip it out but .. I need
> to dust it off.

That would be great, thanks.

Failing that, we could clarify the security support status.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Wei Liu]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was
> > > not given?
> > 
> > Correct, that option is not given in osstest.
> 
> It should be, in the XTF tests at least, perhaps ?
> 

Adding that in would be trivial. But the value of testing that ...

> Unless we're proposing to rip the feature out in stable branches.
> 
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > We don't use it anymore either. I had a patch to rip it out but .. I need
> > to dust it off.
> 
> That would be great, thanks.
> 
> Failing that, we could clarify the security support status.
> 

... depends on the security support status of that particular
feature.

Wei.

> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:46:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:56:01AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > I guess the respective command line option ("allowsuperpage") was
> > > > not given?
> > > 
> > > Correct, that option is not given in osstest.
> > 
> > It should be, in the XTF tests at least, perhaps ?
> > 
> 
> Adding that in would be trivial. But the value of testing that ...
> 
> > Unless we're proposing to rip the feature out in stable branches.
> > 
> > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> > > We don't use it anymore either. I had a patch to rip it out but .. I need
> > > to dust it off.
> > 
> > That would be great, thanks.
> > 
> > Failing that, we could clarify the security support status.
> > 
> 
> ... depends on the security support status of that particular
> feature.

To enable it you had to provide the 'allowsuperpage' parameter so by default
nobody would use it. Which means no security support (like the #UD traping
for cross-vendor migration).

I somehow assumed that any non-default enabled parameters by default would not
receive any security support.

Like running an 'debug=y' kernel or such?



> 
> Wei.
> 
> > Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED

[Ian Jackson]

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xtf test] 100874: all pass - PUSHED"):
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:51:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > ... depends on the security support status of that particular
> > feature.
> 
> To enable it you had to provide the 'allowsuperpage' parameter so by default
> nobody would use it. Which means no security support (like the #UD traping
> for cross-vendor migration).
> 
> I somehow assumed that any non-default enabled parameters by default
> would not receive any security support.
> 
> Like running an 'debug=y' kernel or such?

I can't find any documentation saying that security support is limited
to the default configuration.

The allowsuperpage command line option is documented in
docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown and has no health warning.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel