* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stübner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2017-06-28 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Klaus,
[added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
> Rockchip RK3399.
>
> It provides the following feature set:
> * up to 4GB DDR3
> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
> * 2x MIPI-CSI
> * USB
> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>
> ---
[...]
> + leds {
> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + module_led {
phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
> + label = "module_led";
> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> + panic-indicator;
> + };
> +
> + sd_card_led {
> + label = "sd_card_led";
> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> + opp-shared;
> +
> + opp00 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
> + };
> + opp01 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + };
> + opp02 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
> + opp-suspend;
> + };
> + opp03 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
same as above
> + };
> + opp04 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> + };
> + opp05 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
same as above
> + };
> + opp06 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + };
> + opp07 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + };
> + opp08 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
> + turbo-mode;
Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
> + };
> + };
> +
> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
long run to find and fix things as they occur.
This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + };
This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
together with other regulators in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
in their naming and also hierarchy.
(debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
This of course applies to all defined regulators.
If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
nevermind this comment ;-) .
> +
> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> +};
> +&i2c0 {
> + status = "okay";
> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +
> + vdd_gpu: fan535555 at 60 {
vdd_gpu: regulator at 60 {
node names should be generic (aka device category)
> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
> + reg = <0x60>;
> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
deprecated property and not really needed.
> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> +};
[...]
> +&pcie0 {
> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + num-lanes = <4>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
> + status = "okay";
vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
> +};
> +
[...]
> +&sdmmc {
> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
> + bus-width = <4>;
> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
> + cap-sd-highspeed;
> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + num-slots = <1>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +
double empty line
> +&spi1 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + flash: norflash at 0 {
norflash: flash at 0 maybe?
You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
the specific name might be more helpful.
> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> + };
> +};
> +&pinctrl {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
> +
> + hog {
> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stübner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2017-06-28 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Klaus Goger
Cc: Philipp Tomsich, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
Hi Klaus,
[added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
> Rockchip RK3399.
>
> It provides the following feature set:
> * up to 4GB DDR3
> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
> * 2x MIPI-CSI
> * USB
> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
>
> ---
[...]
> + leds {
> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + module_led {
phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
> + label = "module_led";
> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> + panic-indicator;
> + };
> +
> + sd_card_led {
> + label = "sd_card_led";
> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> + opp-shared;
> +
> + opp00 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
> + };
> + opp01 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> + };
> + opp02 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
> + opp-suspend;
> + };
> + opp03 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
same as above
> + };
> + opp04 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> + };
> + opp05 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
same as above
> + };
> + opp06 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> + };
> + opp07 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + };
> + opp08 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
> + turbo-mode;
Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
> + };
> + };
> +
> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
long run to find and fix things as they occur.
This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + enable-active-high;
> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + };
This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
together with other regulators in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
in their naming and also hierarchy.
(debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
This of course applies to all defined regulators.
If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
nevermind this comment ;-) .
> +
> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> +};
> +&i2c0 {
> + status = "okay";
> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +
> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
node names should be generic (aka device category)
> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
> + reg = <0x60>;
> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
deprecated property and not really needed.
> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> +};
[...]
> +&pcie0 {
> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + num-lanes = <4>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
> + status = "okay";
vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
> +};
> +
[...]
> +&sdmmc {
> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
> + bus-width = <4>;
> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
> + cap-sd-highspeed;
> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + num-slots = <1>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +
double empty line
> +&spi1 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + flash: norflash@0 {
norflash: flash@0 maybe?
You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
the specific name might be more helpful.
> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
> + };
> +};
> +&pinctrl {
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
> +
> + hog {
> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
2017-06-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stübner
(?)
@ 2017-06-28 10:40 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Philipp Tomsich @ 2017-06-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner
Cc: Klaus Goger, devicetree, LKML, linux-rockchip, Rob Herring,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel,
kever.yang
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
The on-board regulators differ and can’t hit the voltages specified
in the original OPP table… this is the next closest value we can
set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
exact voltage used in the “official” OPPs not being supported by
our regulator.
We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
(to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
long term.
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
This one is marked ‘turbo-mode’ as we do recommend to only
enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>
> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:40 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Philipp Tomsich @ 2017-06-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
The on-board regulators differ and can?t hit the voltages specified
in the original OPP table? this is the next closest value we can
set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
exact voltage used in the ?official? OPPs not being supported by
our regulator.
We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
(to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
long term.
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
This one is marked ?turbo-mode? as we do recommend to only
enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555 at 60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator at 60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash at 0 {
>
> norflash: flash at 0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:40 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Philipp Tomsich @ 2017-06-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner
Cc: Klaus Goger, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, LKML,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko Stübner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
The on-board regulators differ and can’t hit the voltages specified
in the original OPP table… this is the next closest value we can
set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
exact voltage used in the “official” OPPs not being supported by
our regulator.
We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
(to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
long term.
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
This one is marked ‘turbo-mode’ as we do recommend to only
enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>
> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-06-28 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Cc: Klaus Goger, devicetree, LKML, linux-rockchip, Rob Herring,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, linux-arm-kernel,
kever.yang
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017, 12:40:01 CEST schrieb Dr. Philipp Tomsich:
>
> > On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
> >
> >
> > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> >> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
> >> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
> >> Rockchip RK3399.
> >>
> >> It provides the following feature set:
> >> * up to 4GB DDR3
> >> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
> >> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
> >> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
> >> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
> >> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
> >> * 2x MIPI-CSI
> >> * USB
> >> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
> >> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
> >> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
> >> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
> >> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
> >> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> + leds {
> >> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +
> >> + module_led {
> >
> > phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
> >
> >> + label = "module_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> >> + panic-indicator;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + sd_card_led {
> >> + label = "sd_card_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
> >> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> >> + opp-shared;
> >> +
> >> + opp00 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp01 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp02 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
> >
> > this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> > I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> > to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> The on-board regulators differ and can’t hit the voltages specified
> in the original OPP table… this is the next closest value we can
> set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
>
> > So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> > And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> > Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
> It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
> exact voltage used in the “official” OPPs not being supported by
> our regulator.
>
> We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
> (to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
> long term.
ok, thanks for that explanation, which also satisfies my reservations :-) .
When fixing the other things, please also add a comment above opp-table
with the above explanation, so future changers don't need to remember
this mail thread :-) .
Also, you might want to add something like
/delete-node/ opp-table1;
before defining your new opp table to prevent the subnode changes
from interfering with your new table.
> >> + opp-suspend;
> >> + };
> >> + opp03 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp04 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp05 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp06 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp07 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp08 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
> >> + turbo-mode;
> >
> > Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> > Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
> Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
> forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
>
> This one is marked ‘turbo-mode’ as we do recommend to only
> enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
ok then.
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-06-28 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017, 12:40:01 CEST schrieb Dr. Philipp Tomsich:
>
> > On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko St?bner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
> >
> >
> > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> >> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
> >> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
> >> Rockchip RK3399.
> >>
> >> It provides the following feature set:
> >> * up to 4GB DDR3
> >> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
> >> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
> >> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
> >> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
> >> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
> >> * 2x MIPI-CSI
> >> * USB
> >> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
> >> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
> >> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
> >> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
> >> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
> >> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> + leds {
> >> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +
> >> + module_led {
> >
> > phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
> >
> >> + label = "module_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> >> + panic-indicator;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + sd_card_led {
> >> + label = "sd_card_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
> >> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> >> + opp-shared;
> >> +
> >> + opp00 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp01 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp02 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
> >
> > this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> > I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> > to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> The on-board regulators differ and can?t hit the voltages specified
> in the original OPP table? this is the next closest value we can
> set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
>
> > So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> > And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> > Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
> It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
> exact voltage used in the ?official? OPPs not being supported by
> our regulator.
>
> We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
> (to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
> long term.
ok, thanks for that explanation, which also satisfies my reservations :-) .
When fixing the other things, please also add a comment above opp-table
with the above explanation, so future changers don't need to remember
this mail thread :-) .
Also, you might want to add something like
/delete-node/ opp-table1;
before defining your new opp table to prevent the subnode changes
from interfering with your new table.
> >> + opp-suspend;
> >> + };
> >> + opp03 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp04 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp05 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp06 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp07 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp08 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
> >> + turbo-mode;
> >
> > Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> > Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
> Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
> forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
>
> This one is marked ?turbo-mode? as we do recommend to only
> enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
ok then.
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 10:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-06-28 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Cc: Klaus Goger, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, LKML,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017, 12:40:01 CEST schrieb Dr. Philipp Tomsich:
>
> > On 28 Jun 2017, at 12:26, Heiko Stübner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
> >
> >
> > Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
> >> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
> >> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
> >> Rockchip RK3399.
> >>
> >> It provides the following feature set:
> >> * up to 4GB DDR3
> >> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
> >> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
> >> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
> >> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
> >> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
> >> * 2x MIPI-CSI
> >> * USB
> >> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
> >> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
> >> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
> >> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
> >> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
> >> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> + leds {
> >> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +
> >> + module_led {
> >
> > phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
> >
> >> + label = "module_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> >> + panic-indicator;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + sd_card_led {
> >> + label = "sd_card_led";
> >> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> >> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
> >> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> >> + opp-shared;
> >> +
> >> + opp00 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp01 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp02 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
> >
> > this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> > I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> > to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> The on-board regulators differ and can’t hit the voltages specified
> in the original OPP table… this is the next closest value we can
> set and is at least what Rockchip uses in the ref-design.
>
> > So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> > And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> > Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
> It avoids ugly issues with OPPs being deactivated due to the the
> exact voltage used in the “official” OPPs not being supported by
> our regulator.
>
> We decided against reusing the original OPP table and modifying it
> (to use ranges) as that was likely to cause even more harm in the
> long term.
ok, thanks for that explanation, which also satisfies my reservations :-) .
When fixing the other things, please also add a comment above opp-table
with the above explanation, so future changers don't need to remember
this mail thread :-) .
Also, you might want to add something like
/delete-node/ opp-table1;
before defining your new opp table to prevent the subnode changes
from interfering with your new table.
> >> + opp-suspend;
> >> + };
> >> + opp03 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp04 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp05 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
> >
> > same as above
> >
> >> + };
> >> + opp06 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp07 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
> >> + };
> >> + opp08 {
> >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
> >> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
> >> + turbo-mode;
> >
> > Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> > Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
> Tested in our lab on a decent population of boards using various
> forms of stress-testing (incl. a 6-way and 8-way SPEC).
>
> This one is marked ‘turbo-mode’ as we do recommend to only
> enable it if a (Qseven-style) heat-sink is mounted.
ok then.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
2017-06-28 10:26 ` Heiko Stübner
(?)
@ 2017-06-28 12:41 ` Shawn Lin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-28 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner, Klaus Goger
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
linux-kernel, kever.yang, linux-rockchip, Rob Herring,
Philipp Tomsich, linux-arm-kernel, shawn.lin
Hi
On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
>
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
supply if possible.
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>
> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 12:41 ` Shawn Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-28 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi
On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
>
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555 at 60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator at 60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
supply if possible.
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash at 0 {
>
> norflash: flash at 0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 12:41 ` Shawn Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-28 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner, Klaus Goger
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Philipp Tomsich,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
Hi
On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>
>
> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>
>> It provides the following feature set:
>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>> * USB
>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>
I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger-SN7IsUiht6C/RdPyistoZJqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +
>> + module_led {
>
> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>
>> + label = "module_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + panic-indicator;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sd_card_led {
>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> + opp-shared;
>> +
>> + opp00 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>> + };
>> + opp01 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + };
>> + opp02 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>
> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>
> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>
>
>> + opp-suspend;
>> + };
>> + opp03 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp04 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + };
>> + opp05 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>
> same as above
>
>> + };
>> + opp06 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>> + };
>> + opp07 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>> + };
>> + opp08 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + turbo-mode;
>
> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>
>
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>
> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>
> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>
> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + enable-active-high;
>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + };
>
> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
> together with other regulators in
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>
> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>
> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>
> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>
> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>
>
>> +
>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +};
>
>> +&i2c0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>
> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>
> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>
>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>> + reg = <0x60>;
>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>
> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>
>
>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>
> deprecated property and not really needed.
>
>
>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + regulator-boot-on;
>> +};
>
>
> [...]
>
>> +&pcie0 {
>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>> + status = "okay";
>
> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> [...]
>
>> +&sdmmc {
>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>> + num-slots = <1>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
supply if possible.
>> +
>> +
>
> double empty line
>
>
>> +&spi1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>
> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>
> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
> the specific name might be more helpful.
>
>
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
>> +&pinctrl {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>> +
>> + hog {
>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>
> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>
> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>
>
> Heiko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 14:01 ` Klaus Goger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Goger @ 2017-06-28 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Lin
Cc: Heiko Stübner, Mark Rutland, devicetree, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, linux-kernel, kever.yang, linux-rockchip,
Rob Herring, Philipp Tomsich, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Shawn,
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Hi Klaus,
>>
>> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>>
>>> It provides the following feature set:
>>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>>> * USB
>>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>>
>
> I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
> Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
The emails got rejected from lists.infradead.org due an issue in the return-path.
I have to reconfigure my mail setup for git send-mail before sending out a v2.
>>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + leds {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +
>>> + module_led {
>>
>> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>>
>>> + label = "module_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>>> + panic-indicator;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sd_card_led {
>>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> + opp-shared;
>>> +
>>> + opp00 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp01 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp02 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>>
>> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
>> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
>> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>>
>> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
>> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
>> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>>
>>
>>> + opp-suspend;
>>> + };
>>> + opp03 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp04 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp05 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp06 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp07 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp08 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + turbo-mode;
>>
>> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
>> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>>
>>
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>>
>> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
>> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
>> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
>> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>>
>> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
>> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>>
>> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + };
>>
>> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
>> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
>> together with other regulators in
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>>
>> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
>> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
>> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>>
>> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>>
>> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>>
>> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
>> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>> +&i2c0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> +
>>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>>
>> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>>
>> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>>
>>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>>> + reg = <0x60>;
>>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>
>> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
>> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
>> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>>
>> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>>
>>
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>>
>> deprecated property and not really needed.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> +};
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&pcie0 {
>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn’t see the need for it.
But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
the dev_info "no xxx regulator found” in pcie-rockchip.c to something
less severe sounding.
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&sdmmc {
>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>
> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>
>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>
>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>
> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn’t get any state changes when
removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
If i overlooked something I’m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
anyways
>
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>
> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
> supply if possible.
Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
and not part of the module dts.
I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> double empty line
>>
>>
>>> +&spi1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>>
>> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>>
>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>
>>
>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>
>>
>>> +&pinctrl {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>> +
>>> + hog {
>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>
>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>
>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Shawn Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 14:01 ` Klaus Goger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Goger @ 2017-06-28 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Shawn,
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>> Hi Klaus,
>>
>> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>>
>>> It provides the following feature set:
>>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>>> * USB
>>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>>
>
> I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
> Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
The emails got rejected from lists.infradead.org due an issue in the return-path.
I have to reconfigure my mail setup for git send-mail before sending out a v2.
>>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + leds {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +
>>> + module_led {
>>
>> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>>
>>> + label = "module_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>>> + panic-indicator;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sd_card_led {
>>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> + opp-shared;
>>> +
>>> + opp00 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp01 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp02 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>>
>> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
>> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
>> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>>
>> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
>> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
>> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>>
>>
>>> + opp-suspend;
>>> + };
>>> + opp03 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp04 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp05 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp06 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp07 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp08 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + turbo-mode;
>>
>> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
>> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>>
>>
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>>
>> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
>> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
>> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
>> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>>
>> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
>> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>>
>> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + };
>>
>> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
>> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
>> together with other regulators in
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>>
>> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
>> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
>> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>>
>> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>>
>> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>>
>> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
>> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>> +&i2c0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> +
>>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555 at 60 {
>>
>> vdd_gpu: regulator at 60 {
>>
>> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>>
>>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>>> + reg = <0x60>;
>>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>
>> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
>> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
>> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>>
>> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>>
>>
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>>
>> deprecated property and not really needed.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> +};
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&pcie0 {
>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn?t see the need for it.
But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
the dev_info "no xxx regulator found? in pcie-rockchip.c to something
less severe sounding.
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&sdmmc {
>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>
> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>
>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>
>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>
> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn?t get any state changes when
removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
If i overlooked something I?m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
anyways
>
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>
> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
> supply if possible.
Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
and not part of the module dts.
I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> double empty line
>>
>>
>>> +&spi1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + flash: norflash at 0 {
>>
>> norflash: flash at 0 maybe?
>>
>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>
>>
>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>
>>
>>> +&pinctrl {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>> +
>>> + hog {
>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>
>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>
>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Shawn Lin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-28 14:01 ` Klaus Goger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Goger @ 2017-06-28 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Lin
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
Heiko Stübner, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Philipp Tomsich,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Hi Shawn,
> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 2017/6/28 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Hi Klaus,
>>
>> [added Kever from Rockchip concerning the cluster1-opps below]
>>
>>
>> Am Montag, 26. Juni 2017, 21:18:54 CEST schrieb Klaus Goger:
>>> The RK3399-Q7 SoM is a Qseven-compatible (70mm x 70mm, MXM-230
>>> connector) system-on-module from Theobroma Systems, featuring the
>>> Rockchip RK3399.
>>>
>>> It provides the following feature set:
>>> * up to 4GB DDR3
>>> * on-module SPI-NOR flash
>>> * on-module eMMC (with 8-bit 1.8V interface)
>>> * SD card (on a baseboad) via edge connector
>>> * Gigabit Ethernet with on-module Micrel KSZ9031 GbE PHY
>>> * HDMI/eDP/2x MIPI-DSI
>>> * 2x MIPI-CSI
>>> * USB
>>> - 1x USB 3.0 dual-role (direct connection)
>>> - 2x USB 3.0 host + 1x USB 2.0 (on-module USB 3.0 hub)
>>> * on-module STM32 Cortex-M0 companion controller, implementing:
>>> - low-power RTC functionality (ISL1208 emulation)
>>> - fan controller (AMC6821 emulation)
>>> - USB<->CAN bridge controller
>>>
>
> I don't find these patches on patchwork of linux-rockchip?
> Anyway, there are some minor inline comment below.
The emails got rejected from lists.infradead.org due an issue in the return-path.
I have to reconfigure my mail setup for git send-mail before sending out a v2.
>>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + leds {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> +
>>> + module_led {
>>
>> phandles use underscores, node names are supposed to use dashes "-"
>>
>>> + label = "module_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>>> + panic-indicator;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + sd_card_led {
>>> + label = "sd_card_led";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + cluster1_opp: opp-table1 {
>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>> + opp-shared;
>>> +
>>> + opp00 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <408000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + clock-latency-ns = <40000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp01 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp02 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <816000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <830000>;
>>
>> this is 5mV higher than the "official" OPPs used by Rockchip, so
>> I'd like to know its background :-) . Especially as I really would like
>> to keep the number of per-board OPPs minimal.
>>
>> So does this make the board run more stable or something else?
>> And might this be applicable for all "standard" rk3399 boards?
>> Especially as other OPPs in your list use the regular voltages.
>>
>>
>>> + opp-suspend;
>>> + };
>>> + opp03 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <880000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp04 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <950000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp05 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1416000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1030000>;
>>
>> same as above
>>
>>> + };
>>> + opp06 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1608000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1100000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp07 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1800000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000>;
>>> + };
>>> + opp08 {
>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1992000000>;
>>> + opp-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + turbo-mode;
>>
>> Is this part of the soc-spec or more like wishful thinking? :-)
>> Again with the question in mind if this applies to all rk3399.
>>
>>
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + clkin_gmac: external-gmac-clock {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "clkin_gmac";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc3v3_sys: vcc3v3-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_otg: vcc5v0-otg-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PA2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&otg_vbus_drv>;
>>
>> gpio pinctrl names should generally follow the pin names
>> in schematics. For example on the rk3399-firefly it also
>> had a pinctrl named host_vbus_drv while the pin in the
>> schematics was named vcc5v0_host_en.
>>
>> Following the schematic names makes it easier in the
>> long run to find and fix things as they occur.
>>
>> This of course applies to all gpio-pinctrls in this dts.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_otg";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_host: vcc5v0-host-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio4 RK_PA3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&vcc5v0_host_en>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_host";
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc5v0_sys: vcc5v0-sys {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc5v0_sys";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + vcc_phy: vcc-phy-regulator {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "vcc_phy";
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + };
>>
>> This looks suspiciously copy-pasted from a vendor devicetree.
>> The firefly used a similar "nonsense"-regulator which I fixed
>> together with other regulators in
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git/commit/?id=12335ebaac8639a2745245e5d179f44f3c70fed1
>>
>> Similar to other regulators above, which also follow naming I fixed
>> on the firefly. Regulators should generally follow the schematics
>> in their naming and also hierarchy.
>>
>> (debugsfs/regulator/regulator_summary shows a nice graph of them)
>>
>> This of course applies to all defined regulators.
>>
>> If your regulator setup actually follows your own schematics then
>> nevermind this comment ;-) .
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + vdd_log: vdd-log {
>>> + compatible = "pwm-regulator";
>>> + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_log";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>> +&i2c0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <168>;
>>> + i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <4>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> +
>>> + vdd_gpu: fan535555@60 {
>>
>> vdd_gpu: regulator@60 {
>>
>> node names should be generic (aka device category)
>>
>>> + compatible = "fcs,fan53555";
>>> + reg = <0x60>;
>>> + vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>
>> not part of the binding right now. While it may be nice to teach
>> the fan53555 to handle the vsel gpio if it is controllable [similar to
>> how the rk808 can do this], this hasn't been implemented yet.
>>
>> Also applies to vdd_cpu_b below.
>>
>>
>>> + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_sys>;
>>> + regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
>>
>> deprecated property and not really needed.
>>
>>
>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <600000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1230000>;
>>> + regulator-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>>> + fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
>>> + regulator-always-on;
>>> + regulator-boot-on;
>>> +};
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&pcie0 {
>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>
> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn’t see the need for it.
But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
the dev_info "no xxx regulator found” in pcie-rockchip.c to something
less severe sounding.
>>> +};
>>> +
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +&sdmmc {
>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>
> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>
>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>
>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>
> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn’t get any state changes when
removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
If i overlooked something I’m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
anyways
>
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>
> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
> supply if possible.
Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
and not part of the module dts.
I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> double empty line
>>
>>
>>> +&spi1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>>
>> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>>
>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>
>>
>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>
>>
>>> +&pinctrl {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>> +
>>> + hog {
>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>
>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>
>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Shawn Lin
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-29 0:14 ` Shawn Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-29 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Klaus Goger
Cc: shawn.lin, Mark Rutland, devicetree, Heiko Stübner,
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-kernel, kever.yang,
linux-rockchip, Rob Herring, Philipp Tomsich, linux-arm-kernel
Hi
On 2017/6/28 22:01, Klaus Goger wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>
--8<-----------
>>>
>>>> +&pcie0 {
>>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>
>>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>>
>> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
>> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
>> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
>> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
> I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
> are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
> also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn’t see the need for it.
> But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
> devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Ok, so you don't need to add these here. :)
>
> Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
> the dev_info "no xxx regulator found” in pcie-rockchip.c to something
> less severe sounding.
>
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +&sdmmc {
>>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>>
>> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>>
>>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>
>> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>>
>>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>>
>> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
>> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>
> I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn’t get any state changes when
Hmm.. we use PA7 as SDMMC0_DET for vendor kernel 4.4.
I guess something goes wrong here and will check if later.
> removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
> which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
> register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
> register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
> If i overlooked something I’m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
> anyways
>
>>
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>
>> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
>> supply if possible.
>
> Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
> and not part of the module dts.
> I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
good to know that.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>
>>> double empty line
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&spi1 {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>>>
>>> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>>>
>>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&pinctrl {
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>>> +
>>>> + hog {
>>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>>
>>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>>
>>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>>> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Shawn Lin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-29 0:14 ` Shawn Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-29 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi
On 2017/6/28 22:01, Klaus Goger wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>
--8<-----------
>>>
>>>> +&pcie0 {
>>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>
>>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>>
>> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
>> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
>> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
>> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
> I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
> are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
> also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn?t see the need for it.
> But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
> devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Ok, so you don't need to add these here. :)
>
> Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
> the dev_info "no xxx regulator found? in pcie-rockchip.c to something
> less severe sounding.
>
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +&sdmmc {
>>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>>
>> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>>
>>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>
>> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>>
>>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>>
>> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
>> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>
> I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn?t get any state changes when
Hmm.. we use PA7 as SDMMC0_DET for vendor kernel 4.4.
I guess something goes wrong here and will check if later.
> removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
> which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
> register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
> register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
> If i overlooked something I?m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
> anyways
>
>>
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>
>> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
>> supply if possible.
>
> Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
> and not part of the module dts.
> I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
good to know that.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>
>>> double empty line
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&spi1 {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> + flash: norflash at 0 {
>>>
>>> norflash: flash at 0 maybe?
>>>
>>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&pinctrl {
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>>> +
>>>> + hog {
>>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>>
>>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>>
>>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>>> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Shawn Lin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add RK3399-Q7 (Puma) SoM
@ 2017-06-29 0:14 ` Shawn Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Lin @ 2017-06-29 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Klaus Goger
Cc: shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw, Mark Rutland,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Heiko Stübner,
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Rob Herring,
Philipp Tomsich,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Hi
On 2017/6/28 22:01, Klaus Goger wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 14:41, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
--8<-----------
>>>
>>>> +&pcie0 {
>>>> + ep-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PC6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-lanes = <4>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqn>;
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>
>>> vpcie{3v3, 1v8, 0v9}-supply properties?
>>
>> These supply are optional which depend on the HW design.
>> But pcie_clkreqn doesn't really work. I think we should
>> use pcie_clkreqn_cpm instead and fix this for rk3399-evb.dts
>> to prevent the further copy-n-paste.
>
> I could add the supply properties but since they where optional and
> are generated by dedicated always-on regulators supplied from the
> also always on regulator vcc3v3_sys I didn’t see the need for it.
> But if anyone to have a full model of the power tree visible in the
> devicetree even if not controllable I can add it in v2.
Ok, so you don't need to add these here. :)
>
> Since the properties are optional maybe we should also change
> the dev_info "no xxx regulator found” in pcie-rockchip.c to something
> less severe sounding.
>
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +&sdmmc {
>>>> + clock-frequency = <150000000>;
>>
>> we deprecates this now, so please use max-frequency instead.
>>
>>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>>> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>>>> + cap-sd-highspeed;
>>>> + cd-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA7 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>
>> Really this board use gpio-based card detect pin?
>>
>>>> + wp-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>> + num-slots = <1>;
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_gpio &sdmmc_bus4>;
>>
>> I guess you don't need sdmmc_gpio and let mmc core request
>> this gpio as irq pin from parsing cd-gpios?
>
> I tried to just use the PA7 as SDMMC0_DET but didn’t get any state changes when
Hmm.. we use PA7 as SDMMC0_DET for vendor kernel 4.4.
I guess something goes wrong here and will check if later.
> removing it or pugging it in after bootup. I tried to follow the mmc code path to see
> which of the 3 card detection modes get configured. It looked to me as the CDETECT
> register gets used but this would not generate any interrupts and requires polling of the
> register. So not using a a gpio card detect requires the broken-cd property for me.
> If i overlooked something I’m happy to change it, I was planning to take a look at it later
> anyways
>
>>
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>
>> And I would be more happy here to see the present of vqmmc and vmmc
>> supply if possible.
>
> Since we are a SoM vmmc would be a property required to be provided from the baseboard
> and not part of the module dts.
> I will add vqmmc for the I/O voltage supplying APIO#
good to know that.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>
>>> double empty line
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&spi1 {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> + flash: norflash@0 {
>>>
>>> norflash: flash@0 maybe?
>>>
>>> You reference the phandle and at the position it gets referenced
>>> the specific name might be more helpful.
>>>
>>>
>>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> +&pinctrl {
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&puma_pin_hog>;
>>>> +
>>>> + hog {
>>>> + puma_pin_hog: puma_pin_hog {
>>>
>>> puma_pin_hog: puma-pin-hog
>>>
>>> Same for more defined pinctrl nodes below that.
>>>
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>>> Linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Shawn Lin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread