All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR
@ 2016-10-17 18:30 Ulf Magnusson
  2016-10-17 18:30 ` Ulf Magnusson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Magnusson @ 2016-10-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

Changes since v1:

Remove now-redundant default 'pr' argument in QueryPlugin.version_str().

Ulf Magnusson (1):
  bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR

 bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR
  2016-10-17 18:30 [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR Ulf Magnusson
@ 2016-10-17 18:30 ` Ulf Magnusson
  2016-10-17 21:42   ` Paul Eggleton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Magnusson @ 2016-10-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-core

Only PE and PV were shown, which might have been an oversight. The
tuples passed to version_str() contain three elements (PE, PV, and PR),
not two.

Also remove now-redundant default 'pr' argument in
QueryPlugin.version_str().

Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
---
 bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py b/bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py
index ee1e7c8..4d6999a 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bblayers/query.py
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ class QueryPlugin(LayerPlugin):
             layername = self.get_layer_name(layerdir)
             logger.plain("%s  %s  %d" % (layername.ljust(20), layerdir.ljust(40), pri))
 
-    def version_str(self, pe, pv, pr = None):
+    def version_str(self, pe, pv, pr):
         verstr = "%s" % pv
         if pr:
             verstr = "%s-%s" % (verstr, pr)
@@ -212,10 +212,10 @@ skipped recipes will also be listed, with a " (skipped)" suffix.
                         if not items_listed:
                             logger.plain('=== %s ===' % title)
                             items_listed = True
-                        print_item(preffile, p, self.version_str(pref[0][0], pref[0][1]), preflayer, True)
+                        print_item(preffile, p, self.version_str(*pref[0]), preflayer, True)
                         for (provfile, provlayer, provver) in provs:
                             if provfile != preffile:
-                                print_item(provfile, p, self.version_str(provver[0], provver[1]), provlayer, False)
+                                print_item(provfile, p, self.version_str(*provver), provlayer, False)
                         # Ensure we don't show two entries for BBCLASSEXTENDed recipes
                         preffiles.append(preffile)
 
-- 
2.7.4



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR
  2016-10-17 18:30 ` Ulf Magnusson
@ 2016-10-17 21:42   ` Paul Eggleton
  2016-10-17 22:33     ` Ulf Magnusson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2016-10-17 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulf Magnusson; +Cc: openembedded-core

Hi Ulf,

On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:30:27 Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> Only PE and PV were shown, which might have been an oversight. The
> tuples passed to version_str() contain three elements (PE, PV, and PR),
> not two.

I have to say I don't recall exactly but I think it was deliberate. We're 
talking about the recipe side here - is knowing the PR value actually useful? 
It's not like you can identify the recipe in any meaningful way by the PR 
value.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR
  2016-10-17 21:42   ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2016-10-17 22:33     ` Ulf Magnusson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Magnusson @ 2016-10-17 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: OE-core

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:30:27 Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>> Only PE and PV were shown, which might have been an oversight. The
>> tuples passed to version_str() contain three elements (PE, PV, and PR),
>> not two.
>
> I have to say I don't recall exactly but I think it was deliberate. We're
> talking about the recipe side here - is knowing the PR value actually useful?
> It's not like you can identify the recipe in any meaningful way by the PR
> value.

It's helpful when mapping recipes to packages at least.

Waxing philosophical, maybe PR could be viewed as a "recipe revision"
with PKGR being the "package revision", in the same sense as for
PE/PKGE and PV/PKGV. That's just an excuse I made up just now though.
I intuitively expected PR to be in there.

> Cheers,
> Paul

Cheers,
Ulf


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-17 22:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-17 18:30 [PATCH v2] bitbake: bitbake-layers: Make show-recipes show PR Ulf Magnusson
2016-10-17 18:30 ` Ulf Magnusson
2016-10-17 21:42   ` Paul Eggleton
2016-10-17 22:33     ` Ulf Magnusson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.