From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com> To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Subject: Re: [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:30:08 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <23778.33200.47146.497482@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <osstest-136385-mainreport@xen.org> osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 136385 xen-4.11-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 135683 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 135683 These are a known bug. The Debian "stretch" ("stable") i386 kernel simply does not work under Xen HVM. I don't thnk this is anything to do with the 4.11 Xen commits under test here. It is appearing here in this flight because I reorganised the amd64/i386 test jobs. > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 135683 I looked at this. I thought it might be the known xenstore memory handling bug but it doesn't seem to be. I looked at the logs and the guest seems simply not to have started at all. There is nothing from it in its pv console. Adding some ARM folks. I have a memory of some allegation that there is a fundamental cache mismanagement problem which might cause this, in which case we probably ought to force push. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com> To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:30:08 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <23778.33200.47146.497482@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190520103008.T9w1vAEV3W9NnGLl0xRC6PfzW3j3MvW-JnyQYdhQ0TM@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <osstest-136385-mainreport@xen.org> osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 136385 xen-4.11-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 135683 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 135683 These are a known bug. The Debian "stretch" ("stable") i386 kernel simply does not work under Xen HVM. I don't thnk this is anything to do with the 4.11 Xen commits under test here. It is appearing here in this flight because I reorganised the amd64/i386 test jobs. > test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 135683 I looked at this. I thought it might be the known xenstore memory handling bug but it doesn't seem to be. I looked at the logs and the guest seems simply not to have started at all. There is nothing from it in its pv console. Adding some ARM folks. I have a memory of some allegation that there is a fundamental cache mismanagement problem which might cause this, in which case we probably ought to force push. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 10:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-05-18 21:09 [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner 2019-05-18 21:09 ` [Xen-devel] " osstest service owner 2019-05-20 10:30 ` Ian Jackson [this message] 2019-05-20 10:30 ` Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 11:27 ` Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 11:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich 2019-05-20 12:51 ` Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 12:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 13:10 ` Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 13:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 14:35 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-20 14:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall 2019-05-20 16:04 ` Ian Jackson 2019-05-20 16:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson 2019-05-21 16:55 ` Julien Grall 2019-05-21 16:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=23778.33200.47146.497482@mariner.uk.xensource.com \ --to=ian.jackson@citrix.com \ --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \ --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \ --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \ --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.