All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <239c5d74-221e-cf8c-2c41-80db016bdc2b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef1eb326-cd3a-4033-813d-ceae262b4e23@arm.com>

On 17/04/2019 14:08, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is
>>> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to
>>> the necessary user policies and host capabilities.
>>>
>>> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
>>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v8:
>>> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable
>>>    status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin]
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED	(1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE		(1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
>>> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
>>>   
>>>   #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \
>>>   			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
>>>   
>>> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)	\
>>> +			((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)
>>> +
>>
>> Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH.
>> Something like:
>>
>> 		(cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \
>> 		 ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH))
> 
> In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to 
> KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions 
> matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), 
> system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view.

It isn't the setting of the flag I care about, but the check of that
flag. Checking a flag for a feature that cannot be used on the running
system should have a zero cost, which isn't the case here.

Granted, the impact should be minimal and it looks like it mostly happen
on the slow path, but at the very least it would be consistent. So even
if you don't buy my argument about efficiency, please change it in the
name of consistency.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <239c5d74-221e-cf8c-2c41-80db016bdc2b@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190417141911.ScM4blIq9frJMaJa3evu9yU0aXK-yofzYvzKZK7-RAc@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef1eb326-cd3a-4033-813d-ceae262b4e23@arm.com>

On 17/04/2019 14:08, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is
>>> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to
>>> the necessary user policies and host capabilities.
>>>
>>> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
>>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v8:
>>> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable
>>>    status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin]
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED	(1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE		(1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
>>> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
>>>   
>>>   #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \
>>>   			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
>>>   
>>> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)	\
>>> +			((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)
>>> +
>>
>> Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH.
>> Something like:
>>
>> 		(cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \
>> 		 ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH))
> 
> In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to 
> KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions 
> matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), 
> system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view.

It isn't the setting of the flag I care about, but the check of that
flag. Checking a flag for a feature that cannot be used on the running
system should have a zero cost, which isn't the case here.

Granted, the impact should be minimal and it looks like it mostly happen
on the slow path, but at the very least it would be consistent. So even
if you don't buy my argument about efficiency, please change it in the
name of consistency.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <239c5d74-221e-cf8c-2c41-80db016bdc2b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef1eb326-cd3a-4033-813d-ceae262b4e23@arm.com>

On 17/04/2019 14:08, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>>> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is
>>> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to
>>> the necessary user policies and host capabilities.
>>>
>>> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
>>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v8:
>>> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable
>>>    status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin]
>>>
>>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED	(1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE		(1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */
>>>   #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
>>> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
>>>   
>>>   #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \
>>>   			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
>>>   
>>> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)	\
>>> +			((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)
>>> +
>>
>> Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH.
>> Something like:
>>
>> 		(cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \
>> 		 ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH))
> 
> In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to 
> KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions 
> matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), 
> system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view.

It isn't the setting of the flag I care about, but the check of that
flag. Checking a flag for a feature that cannot be used on the running
system should have a zero cost, which isn't the case here.

Granted, the impact should be minimal and it looks like it mostly happen
on the slow path, but at the very least it would be consistent. So even
if you don't buy my argument about efficiency, please change it in the
name of consistency.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12  3:20 [PATCH v9 0/5] Add ARMv8.3 pointer authentication for kvm guest Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-16 16:30   ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:30     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:30     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17  8:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17  8:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17  8:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 13:08     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 13:08       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 13:08       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 14:19       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-04-17 14:19         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 14:19         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 14:52         ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 14:52           ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 14:52           ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 15:54           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 15:54             ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 15:54             ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 17:20             ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 17:20               ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 17:20               ` Dave Martin
2019-04-18  8:48               ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-18  8:48                 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-18  8:48                 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-12  3:20 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: context-switch ptrauth registers Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17  9:09   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17  9:09     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17  9:09     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 14:24     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 14:24       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 14:24       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 14:39       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 14:39         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-17 14:39         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-04-12  3:20 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] KVM: arm64: Add userspace flag to enable pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-16 16:31   ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:31     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:31     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17  8:17     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17  8:17       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17  8:17       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] KVM: arm64: Add capability to advertise ptrauth for guest Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-16 16:32   ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:32     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:32     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17  9:39     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17  9:39       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17  9:39       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 15:22       ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 15:22         ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 15:22         ` Dave Martin
2019-04-12  3:20 ` [kvmtool PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a vcpu feature for pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-12  3:20   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-16 16:32   ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:32     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-16 16:32     ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 12:36     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 12:36       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 12:36       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-04-17 15:38       ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 15:38         ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17 15:38         ` Dave Martin
2019-04-17  8:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-04-17  8:55     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=239c5d74-221e-cf8c-2c41-80db016bdc2b@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.