All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	andrew@lunn.ch, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:21:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2428665.BrOON4cELy@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202111829.GE1929@sirena.org.uk>

On Wednesday 02 December 2015 11:18:29 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:12:44AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mvebu tree got a conflict in  between commit
> > 377524dc4d77f50e ("ARM: mmp: move into ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM") from the arm-soc
> > tree and commit 5f4423af9dd17 ("ARM: orion: multiplatform support") from the
> > mvebu tree.
> 
> Ccing in Arnd since I forgot to do that.
> 

I was planning to merge all the multiplatform changes into one next/multiplatform
branch, but the mvebu maintainers preferred to keep this one in their tree at
least initially. The conflict will go away once it's tested sufficiently and
I'm pulling it back.
	
	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:21:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2428665.BrOON4cELy@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202111829.GE1929@sirena.org.uk>

On Wednesday 02 December 2015 11:18:29 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:12:44AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mvebu tree got a conflict in  between commit
> > 377524dc4d77f50e ("ARM: mmp: move into ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM") from the arm-soc
> > tree and commit 5f4423af9dd17 ("ARM: orion: multiplatform support") from the
> > mvebu tree.
> 
> Ccing in Arnd since I forgot to do that.
> 

I was planning to merge all the multiplatform changes into one next/multiplatform
branch, but the mvebu maintainers preferred to keep this one in their tree at
least initially. The conflict will go away once it's tested sufficiently and
I'm pulling it back.
	
	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-02 11:12 linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc tree Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:18 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:18   ` Mark Brown
2015-12-02 11:21   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-12-02 11:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-02 13:49     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-12-02 13:49       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-12-02 15:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-02 15:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-09 23:41 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-09 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-10 13:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-10 13:59   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-10 14:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-10 14:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-05-16 22:47 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-16 22:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-11 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-11 22:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12  8:23 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-12  8:23   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-04-12 10:51   ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12 10:51     ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-13 23:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-13 23:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-13 23:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-17 23:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-17 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-02-17 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-31 23:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-31 23:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-31 23:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-13  0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-13  0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-13  0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-13  1:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-01-13  1:05   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-05-06  1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-06  1:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-06  1:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-06  1:13 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-06  1:13   ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-06  1:13   ` Olof Johansson
2014-03-18  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-18  0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-18  0:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-26  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-26  1:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-26  1:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19  6:05 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19  6:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19  6:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19 20:57 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-19 20:57   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-19 21:09   ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-19 21:09     ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-19 21:09     ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-19 21:38     ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-19 21:38       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-19 21:38       ` Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2428665.BrOON4cELy@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.