All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][4.15?] x86: fix build when NR_CPUS == 1
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:03:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24637.4165.400955.400473@mariner.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d8d5089-32a9-9c42-5949-8f9cd20f33e0@suse.com>

Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH 2/2][4.15?] x86: fix build when NR_CPUS == 1"):
> In this case the compiler is recognizing that no valid array indexes
> remain (in x2apic_cluster()'s access to per_cpu(cpu_2_logical_apicid,
> ...)), but oddly enough isn't really consistent about the checking it
> does (see the code comment).
...
> -        if (this_cpu == cpu || x2apic_cluster(this_cpu) != x2apic_cluster(cpu))
> +        if ( this_cpu == cpu )
> +            continue;
> +        /*
> +         * Guard in particular against the compiler suspecting out-of-bounds
> +         * array accesses below when NR_CPUS=1 (oddly enough with gcc 10 it
> +         * is the 1st of these alone which actually helps, not the 2nd, nor
> +         * are both required together there).
> +         */
> +        BUG_ON(this_cpu >= NR_CPUS);
> +        BUG_ON(cpu >= NR_CPUS);
> +        if ( x2apic_cluster(this_cpu) != x2apic_cluster(cpu) )
>              continue;

Is there some particular reason for not putting the BUG_ON before the
if test ?  That would avoid the refactoring.

Of course putting it in next to the array indexing would address that
too.

Ian.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01  8:27 [PATCH 0/2][4.15?] fix build when NR_CPUS == 1 Jan Beulich
2021-03-01  8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2][4.15?] sched: " Jan Beulich
2021-03-01 15:57   ` Ian Jackson
2021-03-01 17:50     ` Dario Faggioli
2021-03-01  8:31 ` [PATCH 2/2][4.15?] x86: " Jan Beulich
2021-03-01 14:01   ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-03-01 15:14     ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-01 18:00       ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-03-02  9:59         ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-02 10:57           ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-03-02 11:18             ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-01 16:03   ` Ian Jackson [this message]
2021-03-02 10:02     ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-02 12:28       ` Ian Jackson
2021-03-02 13:37         ` Jan Beulich
2021-03-01  8:33 ` [PATCH 0/2][4.15?] " Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24637.4165.400955.400473@mariner.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.