All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jbottomley@odin.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	nico@fluxnic.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: use sector_div instead of do_div
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:38:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24882658.08y4bWL6tn@wuerfel> (raw)

do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less
efficient when sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming
do_div optimizations, the kernel starts warning about this:

drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c: In function 'dif_store':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:207:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast

This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always
produces optimal code.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
Found on the ARM randconfig build today, after I merged Nico's patches
for linux-next

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index dfcc45bb03b1..ec622ba9864a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void *fake_store(unsigned long long lba)
 
 static struct sd_dif_tuple *dif_store(sector_t sector)
 {
-	sector = do_div(sector, sdebug_store_sectors);
+	sector = sector_div(sector, sdebug_store_sectors);
 
 	return dif_storep + sector;
 }
@@ -2780,7 +2780,7 @@ static unsigned long lba_to_map_index(sector_t lba)
 		lba += scsi_debug_unmap_granularity -
 			scsi_debug_unmap_alignment;
 	}
-	do_div(lba, scsi_debug_unmap_granularity);
+	sector_div(lba, scsi_debug_unmap_granularity);
 
 	return lba;
 }


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: use sector_div instead of do_div
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:38:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24882658.08y4bWL6tn@wuerfel> (raw)

do_div is the wrong way to divide a sector_t, as it is less
efficient when sector_t is 32-bit wide. With the upcoming
do_div optimizations, the kernel starts warning about this:

drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c: In function 'dif_store':
include/asm-generic/div64.h:207:28: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast

This changes the code to use sector_div instead, which always
produces optimal code.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
Found on the ARM randconfig build today, after I merged Nico's patches
for linux-next

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index dfcc45bb03b1..ec622ba9864a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void *fake_store(unsigned long long lba)
 
 static struct sd_dif_tuple *dif_store(sector_t sector)
 {
-	sector = do_div(sector, sdebug_store_sectors);
+	sector = sector_div(sector, sdebug_store_sectors);
 
 	return dif_storep + sector;
 }
@@ -2780,7 +2780,7 @@ static unsigned long lba_to_map_index(sector_t lba)
 		lba += scsi_debug_unmap_granularity -
 			scsi_debug_unmap_alignment;
 	}
-	do_div(lba, scsi_debug_unmap_granularity);
+	sector_div(lba, scsi_debug_unmap_granularity);
 
 	return lba;
 }

             reply	other threads:[~2015-11-20 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-20 16:38 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-20 16:38 ` [PATCH] scsi: use sector_div instead of do_div Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-24 12:48 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-11-24 12:48   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-11-24 12:48   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-11-24 12:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-24 12:50   ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-11-24 15:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-24 15:03   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-26  3:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-11-26  3:28   ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-11-26  3:28   ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24882658.08y4bWL6tn@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jbottomley@odin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.