All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-20 21:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury @ 2021-03-20 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-graphics-maintainer, sroland, zackr, airlied, daniel,
	dri-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: rdunlap, Bhaskar Chowdhury


s/particuar/particular/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
  * otherwise the device will error.
- * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
+ * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
  * context is referenced in the command stream.
--
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-20 21:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury @ 2021-03-20 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-graphics-maintainer, sroland, zackr, airlied, daniel,
	dri-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: rdunlap, Bhaskar Chowdhury


s/particuar/particular/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
  * otherwise the device will error.
- * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
+ * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
  * context is referenced in the command stream.
--
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
  2021-03-20 21:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
@ 2021-03-20 22:40   ` Randy Dunlap
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2021-03-20 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
  Cc: linux-graphics-maintainer, sroland, zackr, airlied, daniel,
	dri-devel, linux-kernel



On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>


> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
>  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
>  * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
>  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
>  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
>  * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-20 22:40   ` Randy Dunlap
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2021-03-20 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
  Cc: airlied, sroland, linux-kernel, dri-devel, linux-graphics-maintainer



On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>


> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
>  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
>  * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
>  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
>  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
>  * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
  2021-03-20 21:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
@ 2021-03-21 19:18   ` Zack Rusin
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zack Rusin @ 2021-03-21 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
  Cc: Linux-graphics-maintainer, Roland Scheidegger, David Airlie,
	Daniel Vetter, DRI Development, linux-kernel, rdunlap



> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> s/particuar/particular/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
>  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
>  * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
>  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
>  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
>  * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
> 

Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>

z

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-21 19:18   ` Zack Rusin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zack Rusin @ 2021-03-21 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
  Cc: David Airlie, rdunlap, Roland Scheidegger, linux-kernel,
	DRI Development, Linux-graphics-maintainer



> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> s/particuar/particular/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
>  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
>  * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
>  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
>  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
>  * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
> 

Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>

z
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-21 19:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-20 21:16 [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-20 21:16 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-20 22:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-20 22:40   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-21 19:18 ` Zack Rusin
2021-03-21 19:18   ` Zack Rusin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.