Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:
> next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings

> cavium_octeon_defconfig (mips) — FAIL, 8 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section
> mismatches
>
> Errors:
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:256:12: error: 'union
> cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn73xx'
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:261:12: error: 'union
> cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn70xx'
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'CVMX_GPIO_XBIT_CFGX' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:266:12: error: 'union
> cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn70xx'

Apparently caused by
23c1c9508364 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused GPIO types and macros.")
which was merged last week

> drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c:707:20: error:
> 'CVMX_MIO_PTP_CLOCK_COMP' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c:585:18: error: 'CVMX_MIO_BOOT_LOC_ADR'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c:586:18: error: 'CVMX_MIO_BOOT_LOC_DAT'
> undeclared (first use in this function)

Same for
8ed898353e36 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused MIO types and macros.")

> davinci_all_defconfig (arm) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section
> mismatches
>
> Section mismatches:
> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).

The 'section mismatches' detection in kernelci appears to be broken, so we
don't actually see what happened. I can't reproduce it at the moment,
so it's likely that this is fixed by an older patch of mine:

commit aae89d7dddb831aece31997cdc1c5014fb5a51c1
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Sat Oct 10 21:19:48 2015 +0200

    [WRONG] davinci_mmc: remove incorrect __exit annotation

    WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.exit.text+0x28ec): Section mismatch
in reference from the function davinci_mmcsd_remove() to the function
.init.text:davinci_release_dma_channels()
    The function __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove() references
    a function __init davinci_release_dma_channels().
    This is often seen when error handling in the exit function
    uses functionality in the init path.
    The fix is often to remove the __init annotation of
    davinci_release_dma_channels() so it may be used outside an init section.

    Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
index 621ce47e0e4a..9758d42f19a1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int mmc_davinci_start_dma_transfer(struct
mmc_davinci_host *host,
        return ret;
 }

-static void __init_or_module
+static void
 davinci_release_dma_channels(struct mmc_davinci_host *host)
 {
        if (!host->use_dma)
@@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
        return ret;
 }

-static int __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct mmc_davinci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);

@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ static struct platform_driver davinci_mmcsd_driver = {
                .pm     = davinci_mmcsd_pm_ops,
                .of_match_table = davinci_mmc_dt_ids,
        },
-       .remove         = __exit_p(davinci_mmcsd_remove),
+       .remove         = davinci_mmcsd_remove,
        .id_table       = davinci_mmc_devtype,
 };

This is a very old patch and I don't remember why I never submitted
it or marked it as [WRONG], and I don't see why it only now showed
up in kernelci.

> defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y (x86) — PASS, 0 errors, 5 warnings, 0 section
> mismatches
>
> Warnings:
> drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c:1471:1: warning: the frame size of 2344 bytes is
> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:1409:1: warning: the frame size of 2232 bytes is
> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:4469:1: warning: the frame size of 2224 bytes is
> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:5772:1: warning: the frame size of 2064 bytes is
> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> net/wireless/nl80211.c:1898:1: warning: the frame size of 3784 bytes is
> larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]

I still have this on my radar, didn't get it done for 4.11 though.

> ip27_defconfig (mips) — PASS, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches
>
> Warnings:
> arch/mips/include/asm/uaccess.h:138:21: warning: passing argument 1 of
> '__access_ok' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]

I'd argue that the driver is at fault here, but the code has been unchanged
since it was merged in 2009.

The warning was introduced by Al Viro's
f0a955f4eeec ("mips: sanitize __access_ok()")

which enforces that callers of access_ok() must pass a pointer rather
than an "unsigned long". I could not find any other code that passes
anything other than a __user pointer into access_ok(), so it's probably
best to just fix the driver, but there may be others that I missed.

If we want to be sure that all callers of access_ok() use proper
pointers, this patch could help:

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 68766b276d9e..82ffd44b2908 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -38,8 +38,9 @@
  * Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
  * Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise.
  */
-static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long limit)
+static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(void __user *uptr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long limit)
 {
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long __force)uptr;
  /*
  * If we have used "sizeof()" for the size,
  * we know it won't overflow the limit (but
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long
addr, unsigned long size, un
 #define __range_not_ok(addr, size, limit) \
 ({ \
  __chk_user_ptr(addr); \
- __chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size, limit); \
+ __chk_range_not_ok(addr, size, limit); \
 })

 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP

I'll add this to my randconfig test tree.

> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y+CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS=y (arm) —
> FAIL, 1 error, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>
> Errors:
> arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S:128: Error: invalid immediate for address
> calculation (value = 0x00000004)

I have not seen this one so far, need to investigate more. A quick look points
to this line

        adr     r7, __hyp_stub_vectors

and the symbol it refers to was recently changed in

commit bc845e4fbbbbe97bab3f1bcf688be0b5da420717
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 3 19:37:53 2017 +0100

    ARM: KVM: Implement HVC_RESET_VECTORS stub hypercall in the init code

    In order to restore HYP mode to its original condition, KVM currently
    implements __kvm_hyp_reset(). As we're moving towards a hyp-stub
    defined API, it becomes necessary to implement HVC_RESET_VECTORS.

    This patch adds the HVC_RESET_VECTORS hypercall to the KVM init
    code, which so far lacked any form of hypercall support.

    Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
    Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
    Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
    Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
    Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
index e637854335aa..675c50f5cb5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ ENDPROC(__hyp_reset_vectors)
 #endif

 .align 5
-__hyp_stub_vectors:
+ENTRY(__hyp_stub_vectors)
 __hyp_stub_reset:      W(b)    .
 __hyp_stub_und:                W(b)    .
 __hyp_stub_svc:                W(b)    .

but I don't see why that would cause the build error.

         Arnd

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Ralf Baechle]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:
> > next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings
> 
> > cavium_octeon_defconfig (mips) — FAIL, 8 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section
> > mismatches
> >
> > Errors:
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:256:12: error: 'union
> > cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn73xx'
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:261:12: error: 'union
> > cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn70xx'
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of
> > function 'CVMX_GPIO_XBIT_CFGX' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-usb.c:266:12: error: 'union
> > cvmx_gpio_bit_cfgx' has no member named 'cn70xx'
> 
> Apparently caused by
> 23c1c9508364 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused GPIO types and macros.")
> which was merged last week
> 
> > drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c:707:20: error:
> > 'CVMX_MIO_PTP_CLOCK_COMP' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c:585:18: error: 'CVMX_MIO_BOOT_LOC_ADR'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > drivers/watchdog/octeon-wdt-main.c:586:18: error: 'CVMX_MIO_BOOT_LOC_DAT'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> Same for
> 8ed898353e36 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused MIO types and macros.")

I've dropped both commits a few minutes ago.

  Ralf

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Marc Zyngier]

On 20/04/17 10:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:

[...]

>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y+CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS=y (arm) —
>> FAIL, 1 error, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches
>>
>> Errors:
>> arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S:128: Error: invalid immediate for address
>> calculation (value = 0x00000004)
> 
> I have not seen this one so far, need to investigate more. A quick look points
> to this line
> 
>         adr     r7, __hyp_stub_vectors
> 
> and the symbol it refers to was recently changed in
> 
> commit bc845e4fbbbbe97bab3f1bcf688be0b5da420717
> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 3 19:37:53 2017 +0100
> 
>     ARM: KVM: Implement HVC_RESET_VECTORS stub hypercall in the init code
> 
>     In order to restore HYP mode to its original condition, KVM currently
>     implements __kvm_hyp_reset(). As we're moving towards a hyp-stub
>     defined API, it becomes necessary to implement HVC_RESET_VECTORS.
> 
>     This patch adds the HVC_RESET_VECTORS hypercall to the KVM init
>     code, which so far lacked any form of hypercall support.
> 
>     Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
>     Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>     Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S b/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> index e637854335aa..675c50f5cb5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ ENDPROC(__hyp_reset_vectors)
>  #endif
> 
>  .align 5
> -__hyp_stub_vectors:
> +ENTRY(__hyp_stub_vectors)
>  __hyp_stub_reset:      W(b)    .
>  __hyp_stub_und:                W(b)    .
>  __hyp_stub_svc:                W(b)    .
> 
> but I don't see why that would cause the build error.

Ah, my bad. With Thumb-2, ADR defaults to being the short (16 bit) form,
which cannot encode the displacement (and __hyp_stub_vectors now being
exported, it probably lives further away than it used to). We need the
32 bit version.

The fix is to write the faulting line as:

	W(adr)	r7, __hyp_stub_vectors

I'll post a proper patch in a minute.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Steven J. Hill]

On 04/20/2017 04:33 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:
>>> next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings
>>
[...]
> 
> I've dropped both commits a few minutes ago.
> 
I have found flaws in my testing methodology that I have now
corrected, so these type of errors will be avoided going forward.
Sorry for errors. Cheers.

Steve

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[David Daney]

On 04/20/2017 10:22 AM, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 04:33 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> wrote:
>>>> next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings
>>>
> [...]
>>
>> I've dropped both commits a few minutes ago.
>>
> I have found flaws in my testing methodology that I have now
> corrected, so these type of errors will be avoided going forward.
> Sorry for errors. Cheers.
> 

For a patch that can be proven to touch only one architecture, you must 
do an allyesconfig build for that architecture.

Otherwise, you should also do an allyesconfig build for x86 also.  Bonus 
for both 32-bit and 64-bit coverage

David.

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Sekhar Nori]

Hi Arnd,

On Thursday 20 April 2017 02:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> davinci_all_defconfig (arm) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section
>> mismatches
>>
>> Section mismatches:
>> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
>> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).

> The 'section mismatches' detection in kernelci appears to be broken, so we
> don't actually see what happened. I can't reproduce it at the moment,
> so it's likely that this is fixed by an older patch of mine:

I cannot reproduce this as well.

> 
> commit aae89d7dddb831aece31997cdc1c5014fb5a51c1
> Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date:   Sat Oct 10 21:19:48 2015 +0200
> 
>     [WRONG] davinci_mmc: remove incorrect __exit annotation
> 
>     WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.exit.text+0x28ec): Section mismatch
> in reference from the function davinci_mmcsd_remove() to the function
> .init.text:davinci_release_dma_channels()
>     The function __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove() references
>     a function __init davinci_release_dma_channels().
>     This is often seen when error handling in the exit function
>     uses functionality in the init path.
>     The fix is often to remove the __init annotation of
>     davinci_release_dma_channels() so it may be used outside an init section.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index 621ce47e0e4a..9758d42f19a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int mmc_davinci_start_dma_transfer(struct
> mmc_davinci_host *host,
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static void __init_or_module
> +static void
>  davinci_release_dma_channels(struct mmc_davinci_host *host)
>  {
>         if (!host->use_dma)
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static int __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct mmc_davinci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> 
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ static struct platform_driver davinci_mmcsd_driver = {
>                 .pm     = davinci_mmcsd_pm_ops,
>                 .of_match_table = davinci_mmc_dt_ids,
>         },
> -       .remove         = __exit_p(davinci_mmcsd_remove),
> +       .remove         = davinci_mmcsd_remove,
>         .id_table       = davinci_mmc_devtype,
>  };
> 
> This is a very old patch and I don't remember why I never submitted
> it or marked it as [WRONG], and I don't see why it only now showed
> up in kernelci.

I quite don't see how the existing code is wrong.
davinci_release_dma_channels() is marked __init_or_module and is
accessed in the .remove() routine. If modules are enabled,
davinci_release_dma_channels() is available at the time of module
removal since __init_or_module evaluates to nothing. And if modules are
disabled, then davinci_release_dma_channels() is marked as __init but
davinci_mmcsd_remove() is never called.

Thanks,
Sekhar

Re: next/master build: 206 builds: 2 failed, 204 passed, 9 errors, 10 warnings (next-20170420)

[Sekhar Nori]

Hi Arnd,

On Thursday 20 April 2017 02:53 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> davinci_all_defconfig (arm) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section
>> mismatches
>>
>> Section mismatches:
>> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).
>> WARNING: modpost: Found 1 section mismatch(es).

> The 'section mismatches' detection in kernelci appears to be broken, so we
> don't actually see what happened. I can't reproduce it at the moment,
> so it's likely that this is fixed by an older patch of mine:

I cannot reproduce this as well.

> 
> commit aae89d7dddb831aece31997cdc1c5014fb5a51c1
> Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Date:   Sat Oct 10 21:19:48 2015 +0200
> 
>     [WRONG] davinci_mmc: remove incorrect __exit annotation
> 
>     WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.exit.text+0x28ec): Section mismatch
> in reference from the function davinci_mmcsd_remove() to the function
> .init.text:davinci_release_dma_channels()
>     The function __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove() references
>     a function __init davinci_release_dma_channels().
>     This is often seen when error handling in the exit function
>     uses functionality in the init path.
>     The fix is often to remove the __init annotation of
>     davinci_release_dma_channels() so it may be used outside an init section.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index 621ce47e0e4a..9758d42f19a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int mmc_davinci_start_dma_transfer(struct
> mmc_davinci_host *host,
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static void __init_or_module
> +static void
>  davinci_release_dma_channels(struct mmc_davinci_host *host)
>  {
>         if (!host->use_dma)
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>         return ret;
>  }
> 
> -static int __exit davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int davinci_mmcsd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct mmc_davinci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> 
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ static struct platform_driver davinci_mmcsd_driver = {
>                 .pm     = davinci_mmcsd_pm_ops,
>                 .of_match_table = davinci_mmc_dt_ids,
>         },
> -       .remove         = __exit_p(davinci_mmcsd_remove),
> +       .remove         = davinci_mmcsd_remove,
>         .id_table       = davinci_mmc_devtype,
>  };
> 
> This is a very old patch and I don't remember why I never submitted
> it or marked it as [WRONG], and I don't see why it only now showed
> up in kernelci.

I quite don't see how the existing code is wrong.
davinci_release_dma_channels() is marked __init_or_module and is
accessed in the .remove() routine. If modules are enabled,
davinci_release_dma_channels() is available at the time of module
removal since __init_or_module evaluates to nothing. And if modules are
disabled, then davinci_release_dma_channels() is marked as __init but
davinci_mmcsd_remove() is never called.

Thanks,
Sekhar