All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
	Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:18:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ffeee4-ff43-b3d3-3267-5fcbc50e2974@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5220084.l31t5oJbsy@amdc3058>

Hello Bartlomiej,

On 12/13/2016 01:52 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add missing 2000MHz & 1900MHz OPPs (for A15 cores) and 1400MHz OPP
> (for A7 cores).  Also update common Odroid-XU3 Lite/XU3/XU4 thermal
> cooling maps to account for new OPPs.
> 
> Since new OPPs are not available on all Exynos5422/5800 boards modify
> dts files for Odroid-XU3 Lite (limited to 1.8 GHz / 1.3 GHz) & Peach
> Pi (limited to 2.0 GHz / 1.3 GHz) accordingly.
> 
> Tested on Odroid-XU3 and XU3 Lite.
> 
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi |   14 +++++++-------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts    |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts          |    4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi                  |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert3, reduce CPU
>  				 * by 2 steps. On Exynos5422/5800 that would
> -				 * be: 1600 MHz and 1100 MHz.
> +				 * (usually) be: 1800 MHz and 1200 MHz.
>  				 */
>  				map3 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert3>;
> @@ -131,16 +131,16 @@
>  
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert4, reduce CPU
> -				 * further, down to 600 MHz (11 steps for big,
> -				 * 7 steps for LITTLE).
> +				 * further, down to 600 MHz (13 steps for big,
> +				 * 8 steps for LITTLE).
>  				 */
> -				map5 {
> +				cooling_map5: map5 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 8>;
>  				};
> -				map6 {
> +				cooling_map6: map6 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 13>;
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@
>  	compatible = "hardkernel,odroid-xu3-lite", "samsung,exynos5800", "samsung,exynos5";
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp@2000000000;
> +	/delete-node/opp@1900000000;
> +};
> +
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp@1400000000;
> +};
> +

I think that a comment in the DTS why these operating points aren't available
in this board will make more clear why the nodes are being deleted.

> +&cooling_map5 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +};
> +
> +&cooling_map6 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +};
> +
>  &pwm {
>  	/*
>  	 * PWM 0 -- fan
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@
>  	vdd-supply = <&ldo9_reg>;
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-property/opp@1400000000;
> +};
> +
>  &cpu0 {
>  	cpu-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
>  };
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@
>  };
>  
>  &cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	opp@2000000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2000000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
> +	opp@1900000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1900000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
>  	opp@1700000000 {
>  		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
>  	};
> @@ -85,6 +95,11 @@
>  };
>

AFAIK Thomas restricted the maximum OPP, because for A15 freqs > 1.8GHz the
INT rail would need to be scaled up as well since there's a maximum voltage
difference between the ARM and INT rails before the system becomes unstable:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/276766.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/2/419

The ChromiumOS vendor tree uses a virtual regulator driver that makes sure
the maximum voltage skew is between a limit. But that never made to mainline:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dtsi#90
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/28

Did that change and there's infrastructure in mainline now to cope with that?
If that's the case, I think it would be good to mention in the commit message.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:18:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ffeee4-ff43-b3d3-3267-5fcbc50e2974@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5220084.l31t5oJbsy@amdc3058>

Hello Bartlomiej,

On 12/13/2016 01:52 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add missing 2000MHz & 1900MHz OPPs (for A15 cores) and 1400MHz OPP
> (for A7 cores).  Also update common Odroid-XU3 Lite/XU3/XU4 thermal
> cooling maps to account for new OPPs.
> 
> Since new OPPs are not available on all Exynos5422/5800 boards modify
> dts files for Odroid-XU3 Lite (limited to 1.8 GHz / 1.3 GHz) & Peach
> Pi (limited to 2.0 GHz / 1.3 GHz) accordingly.
> 
> Tested on Odroid-XU3 and XU3 Lite.
> 
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi |   14 +++++++-------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts    |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts          |    4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi                  |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert3, reduce CPU
>  				 * by 2 steps. On Exynos5422/5800 that would
> -				 * be: 1600 MHz and 1100 MHz.
> +				 * (usually) be: 1800 MHz and 1200 MHz.
>  				 */
>  				map3 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert3>;
> @@ -131,16 +131,16 @@
>  
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert4, reduce CPU
> -				 * further, down to 600 MHz (11 steps for big,
> -				 * 7 steps for LITTLE).
> +				 * further, down to 600 MHz (13 steps for big,
> +				 * 8 steps for LITTLE).
>  				 */
> -				map5 {
> +				cooling_map5: map5 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 8>;
>  				};
> -				map6 {
> +				cooling_map6: map6 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 13>;
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@
>  	compatible = "hardkernel,odroid-xu3-lite", "samsung,exynos5800", "samsung,exynos5";
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp@2000000000;
> +	/delete-node/opp@1900000000;
> +};
> +
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp@1400000000;
> +};
> +

I think that a comment in the DTS why these operating points aren't available
in this board will make more clear why the nodes are being deleted.

> +&cooling_map5 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +};
> +
> +&cooling_map6 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +};
> +
>  &pwm {
>  	/*
>  	 * PWM 0 -- fan
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@
>  	vdd-supply = <&ldo9_reg>;
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-property/opp@1400000000;
> +};
> +
>  &cpu0 {
>  	cpu-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
>  };
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@
>  };
>  
>  &cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	opp@2000000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2000000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
> +	opp@1900000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1900000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
>  	opp@1700000000 {
>  		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
>  	};
> @@ -85,6 +95,11 @@
>  };
>

AFAIK Thomas restricted the maximum OPP, because for A15 freqs > 1.8GHz the
INT rail would need to be scaled up as well since there's a maximum voltage
difference between the ARM and INT rails before the system becomes unstable:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/276766.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/2/419

The ChromiumOS vendor tree uses a virtual regulator driver that makes sure
the maximum voltage skew is between a limit. But that never made to mainline:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dtsi#90
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/28

Did that change and there's infrastructure in mainline now to cope with that?
If that's the case, I think it would be good to mention in the commit message.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:18:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ffeee4-ff43-b3d3-3267-5fcbc50e2974@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5220084.l31t5oJbsy@amdc3058>

Hello Bartlomiej,

On 12/13/2016 01:52 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add missing 2000MHz & 1900MHz OPPs (for A15 cores) and 1400MHz OPP
> (for A7 cores).  Also update common Odroid-XU3 Lite/XU3/XU4 thermal
> cooling maps to account for new OPPs.
> 
> Since new OPPs are not available on all Exynos5422/5800 boards modify
> dts files for Odroid-XU3 Lite (limited to 1.8 GHz / 1.3 GHz) & Peach
> Pi (limited to 2.0 GHz / 1.3 GHz) accordingly.
> 
> Tested on Odroid-XU3 and XU3 Lite.
> 
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
> Cc: Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi |   14 +++++++-------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts    |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts          |    4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi                  |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert3, reduce CPU
>  				 * by 2 steps. On Exynos5422/5800 that would
> -				 * be: 1600 MHz and 1100 MHz.
> +				 * (usually) be: 1800 MHz and 1200 MHz.
>  				 */
>  				map3 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert3>;
> @@ -131,16 +131,16 @@
>  
>  				/*
>  				 * When reaching cpu_alert4, reduce CPU
> -				 * further, down to 600 MHz (11 steps for big,
> -				 * 7 steps for LITTLE).
> +				 * further, down to 600 MHz (13 steps for big,
> +				 * 8 steps for LITTLE).
>  				 */
> -				map5 {
> +				cooling_map5: map5 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 8>;
>  				};
> -				map6 {
> +				cooling_map6: map6 {
>  					trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> -					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +					cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 13>;
>  				};
>  			};
>  		};
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@
>  	compatible = "hardkernel,odroid-xu3-lite", "samsung,exynos5800", "samsung,exynos5";
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp at 2000000000;
> +	/delete-node/opp at 1900000000;
> +};
> +
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-node/opp at 1400000000;
> +};
> +

I think that a comment in the DTS why these operating points aren't available
in this board will make more clear why the nodes are being deleted.

> +&cooling_map5 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> +};
> +
> +&cooling_map6 {
> +	cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> +};
> +
>  &pwm {
>  	/*
>  	 * PWM 0 -- fan
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@
>  	vdd-supply = <&ldo9_reg>;
>  };
>  
> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> +	/delete-property/opp at 1400000000;
> +};
> +
>  &cpu0 {
>  	cpu-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
>  };
> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi	2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@
>  };
>  
>  &cluster_a15_opp_table {
> +	opp at 2000000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2000000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
> +	opp at 1900000000 {
> +		opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1900000000>;
> +		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> +		clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> +	};
>  	opp at 1700000000 {
>  		opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
>  	};
> @@ -85,6 +95,11 @@
>  };
>

AFAIK Thomas restricted the maximum OPP, because for A15 freqs > 1.8GHz the
INT rail would need to be scaled up as well since there's a maximum voltage
difference between the ARM and INT rails before the system becomes unstable:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/276766.html
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/2/419

The ChromiumOS vendor tree uses a virtual regulator driver that makes sure
the maximum voltage skew is between a limit. But that never made to mainline:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dtsi#90
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/28

Did that change and there's infrastructure in mainline now to cope with that?
If that's the case, I think it would be good to mention in the commit message.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-13 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 16:52 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-13 16:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-13 16:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-13 19:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2016-12-13 19:18   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-13 19:18   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 13:28   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 13:28     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:06     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 14:06       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 14:25       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:25         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:40         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 14:40           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 16:10           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 16:10             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 17:19             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 17:19               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-16  0:52     ` Doug Anderson
2016-12-16  0:52       ` Doug Anderson
2016-12-16  0:52       ` Doug Anderson
2016-12-16  7:37       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-16  7:37         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-16  7:37         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-16  9:08         ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-16  9:08           ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-16  9:08           ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-16 16:22           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-16 16:22             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-16 16:22             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-19  9:14             ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-19  9:14               ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-19  9:14               ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-17  7:31           ` Anand Moon
2016-12-17  7:31             ` Anand Moon
2016-12-17  7:31             ` Anand Moon
2016-12-19 13:35         ` Alim Akhtar
2016-12-19 13:35           ` Alim Akhtar
2016-12-19 13:35           ` Alim Akhtar
2016-12-14 18:20   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-12-14 18:20     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26ffeee4-ff43-b3d3-3267-5fcbc50e2974@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=ben@smart-cactus.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.