Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bme680_i2c: Remove ACPI support

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 5/8/21 9:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> 
> On Saturday, May 8, 2021, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net <mailto:linux@roeck-us.net>> wrote:
> 
>     On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:31:54AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>     > On Wed,  5 May 2021 20:43:32 -0700
>     > Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net <mailto:linux@roeck-us.net>> wrote:
>     >
>     > > With CONFIG_ACPI=n and -Werror, 0-day reports:
>     > >
>     > > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_i2c.c:46:36: error:
>     > >     'bme680_acpi_match' defined but not used
>     > >
>     > > Apparently BME0680 is not a valid ACPI ID. Remove it and with it
>     > > ACPI support from the bme680_i2c driver.
>     > >
>     > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com <mailto:lkp@intel.com>>
>     > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com <mailto:andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>>
>     > > Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com <mailto:hdegoede@redhat.com>>
>     > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net <mailto:linux@roeck-us.net>>
>     >
>     > A note for these is that I'll change the patch titles when applying.
>     > We aren't removing ACPI support from the drivers, we are simply
>     > removing the ACPI ID table entries.  For most of these PRP0001 magic
>     > will work just fine with the OF table.  That's probably the
>     > right way for small companies etc to use these in products without
>     > having to jump through the hoops of getting an ACPI ID.
>     >
> 
>     Below is what Coccinelle tells me about ACPI IDs in drivers/iio.
>     The script (tries) to do a prefix match of all ACPI IDs it finds against
>     the PNP and ACPI ID databases from https://uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry <https://uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry>.
> 
>     Andy, Hans, does that look about right ?
> 
> 
> 
> The result looks nice for the first step!
>  
> 
> 
>     Next question is what to do with the mismatches and with false
>     negatives such as:
> 
>     drivers/iio/accel/stk8312.c
>       STK8312: match (prefix) against STK (SANTAK CORP.)
>     drivers/iio/light/isl29018.c
>       ISL29018: match (prefix) against ISL (Isolation Systems)
>       ISL29023: match (prefix) against ISL (Isolation Systems)
>       ISL29035: match (prefix) against ISL (Isolation Systems)
>     drivers/iio/gyro/bmg160_i2c.c
> 
> 
>  
> 
>       BMI055B: match (prefix) against BMI (Benson Medical Instruments Company)
>       BMI088B: match (prefix) against BMI (Benson Medical Instruments Company)
> 
> 
> These I think the real ones from the existing devices.

No that is wrong, these are Bosch sensors, so the BOSC0200 entry for
the companion accelerometer is the only entry using the official company
prefix. At least "BMA" ("BMA250E") and "BSG" ("BSG1160", "BSG2150") are
also know to be used as prefixes for ACPI HIDs which are in active
use for Bosch sensors :|

And Benson Medical Instruments Company has nothing to do with these
sensors :|

Regards,

Hans