All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c
@ 2013-05-14 13:00 Jiang Liu
  2013-05-14 13:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages Jiang Liu
  2013-05-28 22:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-05-14 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yinghai Lu
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani, Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang,
	Jiang Liu, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown, linux-acpi

Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
 	.detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
 };
 
-/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
-
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
 
 /**
@@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		}
 	}
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
 	root->device = device;
 	root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
 	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
@@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	 * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
 	 */
 
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
 	/*
 	 * Scan the Root Bridge
 	 * --------------------
@@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
 			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
 		result = -ENODEV;
-		goto out_del_root;
+		goto end;
 	}
 
 	/* ASPM setting */
@@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
 		pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
 		pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
-	}
-
-	/* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
-	if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+		/* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
 		pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
+	}
 
 	pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
 	return 1;
 
-out_del_root:
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_del(&root->node);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
 end:
 	kfree(root);
 	return result;
@@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 	pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
 
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_del(&root->node);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
 	kfree(root);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
 int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
 
 struct acpi_pci_root {
-	struct list_head node;
 	struct acpi_device * device;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	u16 segment;
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
  2013-05-14 13:00 [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Jiang Liu
@ 2013-05-14 13:00 ` Jiang Liu
  2013-05-30 17:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-05-28 22:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Bjorn Helgaas
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-05-14 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yinghai Lu
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani, Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang,
	Jiang Liu, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown, linux-acpi

Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
 	u32 flags, base_flags;
 	bool is_osc_granted = false;
+	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
 
 	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!root)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	segment = 0;
-	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
+	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
 				       &segment);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
+		acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
 		result = -ENODEV;
 		goto end;
 	}
 
 	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
 	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
-	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
+	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		/*
 		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
@@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
 		 */
 		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
-		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
-		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
-		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
+		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
 					       NULL, &bus);
 		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
 			root->secondary.start = bus;
 		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
 			root->secondary.start = 0;
 		else {
-			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
+			acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
 			result = -ENODEV;
 			goto end;
 		}
@@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
 	device->driver_data = root;
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
+	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
 	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
 	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
 
-	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
+	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
 
 	/*
 	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
@@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
 			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
 
-		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
+		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
 				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
 		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
 			is_osc_granted = true;
@@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	 */
 	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
 	if (!root->bus) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
-			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
-			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
+		acpi_handle_err(handle,
+			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
+			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
 		result = -ENODEV;
 		goto end;
 	}
@@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
 			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
 	} else {
-		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
-			"disabling ASPM\n");
+		acpi_handle_info(handle,
+			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
 		pcie_no_aspm();
 	}
 
@@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
 	struct acpi_device *device;
 
 	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+				   "acpi device exists...\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
 	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
+		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
 }
 
 static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
 static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
 	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	u32 type;
@@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
 
-	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
-
 	switch (type) {
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
 		/* bus enumerate */
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
-				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
 		if (!root)
 			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
 
@@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
 		/* device check */
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
-				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
 		if (!root)
 			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
 		break;
 
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
 		/* request device eject */
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
-				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
 		if (root)
 			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
 		break;
 	default:
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
-				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
+		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
+			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
 		break;
 	}
 
 	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
-	kfree(buffer.pointer);
 }
 
 static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
@@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
 find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
-	char objname[64];
-	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
-				      .pointer = objname };
 	int *count = (int *)context;
 
 	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
@@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
 
 	(*count)++;
 
-	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
-
 	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
 					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
-				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
+			 (unsigned int)status);
 	else
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
-				 objname);
+		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
+				   "notify handler is installed\n");
 
 	return AE_OK;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c
  2013-05-14 13:00 [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Jiang Liu
  2013-05-14 13:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages Jiang Liu
@ 2013-05-28 22:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-05-28 23:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-05-28 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.

Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add

  Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Bjorn

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
>         .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
>  };
>
> -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> -
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
>
>  /**
> @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
>         root->device = device;
>         root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
>         strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>          * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
>          */
>
> -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -
>         /*
>          * Scan the Root Bridge
>          * --------------------
> @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                             "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>                             root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>                 result = -ENODEV;
> -               goto out_del_root;
> +               goto end;
>         }
>
>         /* ASPM setting */
> @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
>                 pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
>                 pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> -       }
> -
> -       /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> -       if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> +               /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
>                 pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> +       }
>
>         pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
>         return 1;
>
> -out_del_root:
> -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       list_del(&root->node);
> -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -
>  end:
>         kfree(root);
>         return result;
> @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
>
>         pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
>
> -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> -       list_del(&root->node);
> -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
>         kfree(root);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
>  int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
>
>  struct acpi_pci_root {
> -       struct list_head node;
>         struct acpi_device * device;
>         struct pci_bus *bus;
>         u16 segment;
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c
  2013-05-28 22:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2013-05-28 23:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2013-05-28 23:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-05-28 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:37:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 -
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.
> 
> Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add
> 
>   Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

OK, I'll take them.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
> >         .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
> >  };
> >
> > -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> > -
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >                 }
> >         }
> >
> > -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
> >         root->device = device;
> >         root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
> >         strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> > @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >          * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> >          */
> >
> > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -       list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -
> >         /*
> >          * Scan the Root Bridge
> >          * --------------------
> > @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >                             "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> >                             root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> >                 result = -ENODEV;
> > -               goto out_del_root;
> > +               goto end;
> >         }
> >
> >         /* ASPM setting */
> > @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >         if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> >                 pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
> >                 pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > -       if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> > +               /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> >                 pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> > +       }
> >
> >         pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
> >         return 1;
> >
> > -out_del_root:
> > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -       list_del(&root->node);
> > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -
> >  end:
> >         kfree(root);
> >         return result;
> > @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> >
> >         pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
> >
> > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > -       list_del(&root->node);
> > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> >         kfree(root);
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> >  int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> >
> >  struct acpi_pci_root {
> > -       struct list_head node;
> >         struct acpi_device * device;
> >         struct pci_bus *bus;
> >         u16 segment;
> > --
> > 1.8.1.2
> >
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c
  2013-05-28 23:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-05-28 23:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-05-28 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 01:21:08 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 04:37:03 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
> > >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 -
> > >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This and the "use acpi_handle_print()" patch look fine to me.
> > 
> > Rafael, I can take them, or if you want to take them yourself, you can add
> > 
> >   Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> OK, I'll take them.

Well, if I do that, there will be conflicts between our trees, so I think it's
better if you handle them.

Please add

	Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

to both.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > > @@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
> > >         .detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
> > >  };
> > >
> > > -/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
> > > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
> > > -
> > >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > @@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > >                 }
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
> > >         root->device = device;
> > >         root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
> > >         strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
> > > @@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > >          * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> > >          */
> > >
> > > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -       list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
> > > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -
> > >         /*
> > >          * Scan the Root Bridge
> > >          * --------------------
> > > @@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > >                             "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > >                             root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > >                 result = -ENODEV;
> > > -               goto out_del_root;
> > > +               goto end;
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         /* ASPM setting */
> > > @@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> > >         if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
> > >                 pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
> > >                 pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
> > > -       }
> > > -
> > > -       /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > > -       if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> > > +               /* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
> > >                 pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
> > > +       }
> > >
> > >         pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
> > >         return 1;
> > >
> > > -out_del_root:
> > > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -       list_del(&root->node);
> > > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -
> > >  end:
> > >         kfree(root);
> > >         return result;
> > > @@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> > >
> > >         pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
> > >
> > > -       mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > > -       list_del(&root->node);
> > > -       mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
> > >         kfree(root);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
> > > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > > @@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> > >  int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
> > >
> > >  struct acpi_pci_root {
> > > -       struct list_head node;
> > >         struct acpi_device * device;
> > >         struct pci_bus *bus;
> > >         u16 segment;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.1.2
> > >
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
  2013-05-14 13:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages Jiang Liu
@ 2013-05-30 17:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-05-30 19:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-05-30 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>  	u32 flags, base_flags;
>  	bool is_osc_granted = false;
> +	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>  
>  	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!root)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	segment = 0;
> -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>  				       &segment);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");

I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here.  The difference is like this:

  acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
  ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM

I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
choose one or the other and use it consistently.  Personally, I think the
internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat.  For that reason, I prefer
dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
acpi_handle_printk().

Bjorn

>  		result = -ENODEV;
>  		goto end;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>  	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> -	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> +	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>  		 */
>  		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> -		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> -		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> +				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>  					       NULL, &bus);
>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>  			root->secondary.start = bus;
>  		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>  			root->secondary.start = 0;
>  		else {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> +			acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>  			result = -ENODEV;
>  			goto end;
>  		}
> @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = root;
>  
> -	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> +	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>  	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>  	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
>  
> -	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> +	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		dev_info(&device->dev,
>  			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>  
> -		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
>  				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>  			is_osc_granted = true;
> @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	 */
>  	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>  	if (!root->bus) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> -			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> -			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> +		acpi_handle_err(handle,
> +			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> +			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>  		result = -ENODEV;
>  		goto end;
>  	}
> @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>  			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>  	} else {
> -		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> -			"disabling ASPM\n");
> +		acpi_handle_info(handle,
> +			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>  		pcie_no_aspm();
>  	}
>  
> @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>  	struct acpi_device *device;
>  
>  	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "acpi device exists...\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>  }
>  
>  static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>  static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>  	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>  	acpi_handle handle;
>  	u32 type;
> @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>  
> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>  		/* bus enumerate */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (!root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>  
> @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>  		/* device check */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (!root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>  		/* request device eject */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> -				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> +			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> -	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>  }
>  
>  static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>  find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
> -	char objname[64];
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> -				      .pointer = objname };
>  	int *count = (int *)context;
>  
>  	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>  
>  	(*count)++;
>  
> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
>  	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>  					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> -				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> +			 (unsigned int)status);
>  	else
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> -				 objname);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "notify handler is installed\n");
>  
>  	return AE_OK;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
  2013-05-30 17:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2013-05-30 19:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2013-05-31 16:20       ` Jiang Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-05-30 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> >  	u32 flags, base_flags;
> >  	bool is_osc_granted = false;
> > +	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> >  
> >  	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!root)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> >  	segment = 0;
> > -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> > +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> >  				       &segment);
> >  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> > -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> > +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> 
> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here.  The difference is like this:
> 
>   acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>   ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
> 
> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
> choose one or the other and use it consistently.  Personally, I think the
> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat.  For that reason, I prefer
> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
> acpi_handle_printk().

I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
consistently.

Thanks,
Rafael


> >  		result = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto end;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
> >  	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> > -	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> > +	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
> >  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> > @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
> >  		 */
> >  		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> > -		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> > -		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> > -		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> > +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> > +				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> > +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> >  					       NULL, &bus);
> >  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> >  			root->secondary.start = bus;
> >  		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
> >  			root->secondary.start = 0;
> >  		else {
> > -			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> > +			acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> >  			result = -ENODEV;
> >  			goto end;
> >  		}
> > @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
> >  	device->driver_data = root;
> >  
> > -	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> > +	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> >  	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
> >  	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
> >  
> > -	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> > +	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> > @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  		dev_info(&device->dev,
> >  			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
> >  
> > -		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> > +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
> >  				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
> >  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> >  			is_osc_granted = true;
> > @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  	 */
> >  	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> >  	if (!root->bus) {
> > -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> > -			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > -			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> > +		acpi_handle_err(handle,
> > +			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> > +			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> >  		result = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto end;
> >  	}
> > @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> >  		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
> >  			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
> >  	} else {
> > -		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> > -			"disabling ASPM\n");
> > +		acpi_handle_info(handle,
> > +			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> >  		pcie_no_aspm();
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
> >  	struct acpi_device *device;
> >  
> >  	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +				   "acpi device exists...\n");
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> > -		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> > +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> > @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> >  static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> >  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> > -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
> >  	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
> >  	acpi_handle handle;
> >  	u32 type;
> > @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> >  
> >  	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
> >  
> > -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > -
> >  	switch (type) {
> >  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> >  		/* bus enumerate */
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> >  		if (!root)
> >  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> >  
> > @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
> >  
> >  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> >  		/* device check */
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
> >  		if (!root)
> >  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
> >  		break;
> >  
> >  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> >  		/* request device eject */
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> > -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
> >  		if (root)
> >  			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
> >  		break;
> >  	default:
> > -		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> > -				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> > +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> > +			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> > -	kfree(buffer.pointer);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> > @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
> >  find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >  {
> >  	acpi_status status;
> > -	char objname[64];
> > -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> > -				      .pointer = objname };
> >  	int *count = (int *)context;
> >  
> >  	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> > @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >  
> >  	(*count)++;
> >  
> > -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > -
> >  	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
> >  					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
> >  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> > -				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> > +			 (unsigned int)status);
> >  	else
> > -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> > -				 objname);
> > +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> > +				   "notify handler is installed\n");
> >  
> >  	return AE_OK;
> >  }
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
  2013-05-30 19:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-05-31 16:20       ` Jiang Liu
  2013-05-31 19:18         ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-05-31 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani, Myron Stowe,
	Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown, linux-acpi,
	Bjorn Helgaas

On Fri 31 May 2013 03:51:51 AM CST, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
>>> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>>  	u32 flags, base_flags;
>>>  	bool is_osc_granted = false;
>>> +	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>>>
>>>  	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>  	if (!root)
>>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>>  	segment = 0;
>>> -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>>  				       &segment);
>>>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>>> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>
>> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
>> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here.  The difference is like this:
>>
>>   acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>   ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>
>> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
>> choose one or the other and use it consistently.  Personally, I think the
>> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
>> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat.  For that reason, I prefer
>> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
>> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
>> acpi_handle_printk().
>
> I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
> consistently.
Hi Bjorn and Rafael,
     I will work on this tomorrow. In some cases, only handle is 
available, so we
could only use acpi_handle_printk(). So I think the directly may be: 
use dev_printk()
if possible, otherwise use acpi_handle_printk() instead. Is that the 
right way to go?
Regards!
Gerry

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
>>>  		result = -ENODEV;
>>>  		goto end;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>>>  	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>> -	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
>>> +	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(handle, &root->secondary);
>>>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>>  		/*
>>>  		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
>>> @@ -404,16 +405,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>>>  		 */
>>>  		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
>>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
>>> -		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>>> -		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>>> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>>> +				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>>> +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>>>  					       NULL, &bus);
>>>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>>  			root->secondary.start = bus;
>>>  		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>>>  			root->secondary.start = 0;
>>>  		else {
>>> -			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>>> +			acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>>>  			result = -ENODEV;
>>>  			goto end;
>>>  		}
>>> @@ -425,11 +426,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>>>  	device->driver_data = root;
>>>
>>> -	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>>> +	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>>>  	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>>>  	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
>>>
>>> -	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
>>> +	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(handle);
>>>
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
>>> @@ -473,7 +474,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  		dev_info(&device->dev,
>>>  			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>>>
>>> -		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
>>> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &flags,
>>>  				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>>>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>>>  			is_osc_granted = true;
>>> @@ -505,9 +506,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  	 */
>>>  	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>>>  	if (!root->bus) {
>>> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
>>> -			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>>> -			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>>> +		acpi_handle_err(handle,
>>> +			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>>> +			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>>>  		result = -ENODEV;
>>>  		goto end;
>>>  	}
>>> @@ -517,8 +518,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>  		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>>>  			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>>>  	} else {
>>> -		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
>>> -			"disabling ASPM\n");
>>> +		acpi_handle_info(handle,
>>> +			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>>>  		pcie_no_aspm();
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> @@ -571,12 +572,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>>>  	struct acpi_device *device;
>>>
>>>  	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +				   "acpi device exists...\n");
>>>  		return;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
>>> -		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>>> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>>> @@ -602,7 +604,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>>>  static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>>>  	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>>>  	acpi_handle handle;
>>>  	u32 type;
>>> @@ -613,13 +614,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>>
>>>  	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>>>
>>> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>>> -
>>>  	switch (type) {
>>>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>>>  		/* bus enumerate */
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>>  		if (!root)
>>>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>>
>>> @@ -627,27 +626,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>>
>>>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>>>  		/* device check */
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>>  		if (!root)
>>>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>>  		break;
>>>
>>>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>>>  		/* request device eject */
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
>>> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>>>  		if (root)
>>>  			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	default:
>>> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
>>> -				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
>>> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>>> +			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x\n", type);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>>  	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
>>> -	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
>>> @@ -661,9 +659,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>>>  find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>>  {
>>>  	acpi_status status;
>>> -	char objname[64];
>>> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
>>> -				      .pointer = objname };
>>>  	int *count = (int *)context;
>>>
>>>  	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
>>> @@ -671,16 +666,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>>
>>>  	(*count)++;
>>>
>>> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>>> -
>>>  	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>>>  					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>>>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>>> -				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>>> +			 (unsigned int)status);
>>>  	else
>>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
>>> -				 objname);
>>> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>>> +				   "notify handler is installed\n");
>>>
>>>  	return AE_OK;
>>>  }
>>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages
  2013-05-31 16:20       ` Jiang Liu
@ 2013-05-31 19:18         ` Bjorn Helgaas
  2013-06-03 13:16           ` [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: use dev_printk() to keep messages consistent Jiang Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-05-31 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Yinghai Lu, Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani,
	Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown,
	linux-acpi

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri 31 May 2013 03:51:51 AM CST, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33:56 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 09:00:39PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>>>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
>>>> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> index 91ddfd6..21dda5a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>>>> @@ -379,23 +379,24 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>>>>     struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>>>>     u32 flags, base_flags;
>>>>     bool is_osc_granted = false;
>>>> +   acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
>>>>
>>>>     root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>     if (!root)
>>>>             return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>>     segment = 0;
>>>> -   status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>>> +   status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>>>>                                    &segment);
>>>>     if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>>>> -           printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>>> +           acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>>>
>>> I previously acked this, but I noticed that we are making a mix of
>>> dev_printk() and acpi_handle_printk() here.  The difference is like this:
>>>
>>>   acpi PNP0A08:00: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>>   ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: ACPI _OSC support notification failed, disabling PCIe ASPM
>>>
>>> I'm not sure which direction we should go here, but I think we should
>>> choose one or the other and use it consistently.  Personally, I think the
>>> internal DSDT names should be available *somewhere*, but not necessarily
>>> used in run-of-the-mill chit-chat.  For that reason, I prefer
>>> dev_printk(), though I have the feeling that Rafael is moving toward
>>> eliminating the struct acpi_device, so he might prefer
>>> acpi_handle_printk().
>>
>> I really don't care that much, but I agree that they should be used
>> consistently.
> Hi Bjorn and Rafael,
>      I will work on this tomorrow. In some cases, only handle is
> available, so we
> could only use acpi_handle_printk(). So I think the directly may be:
> use dev_printk()
> if possible, otherwise use acpi_handle_printk() instead. Is that the
> right way to go?

That sounds good to me.

Bjorn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: use dev_printk() to keep messages consistent
  2013-05-31 19:18         ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2013-06-03 13:16           ` Jiang Liu
  2013-06-03 21:09             ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-06-03 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki; +Cc: Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-pci

As pointed out by Bjorn that acpi_handle_printk() generates messages
like "ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: xxxxx" and dev_printk() generates messages
like "acpi PNP0A08:00: xxxx", so use dev_printk() to keep messages
consistent when possible.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
---
Hi Bjorn,
	Could you please help to fold this patch onto "PCI/ACPI: Use
acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages" of branch
"pci/jiang-remove-global-list"?
Thanks!
Gerry
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 73a934d..4a8f5b4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
 				       &segment);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
-		acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
+		dev_err(&device->dev,  "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
 		result = -ENODEV;
 		goto end;
 	}
@@ -404,8 +404,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
 		 */
 		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
-		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
-				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
+		dev_warn(&device->dev,
+			 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
 		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
 					       NULL, &bus);
 		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
 			root->secondary.start = 0;
 		else {
-			acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
+			dev_err(&device->dev, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
 			result = -ENODEV;
 			goto end;
 		}
@@ -451,9 +451,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	 */
 	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
 	if (!root->bus) {
-		acpi_handle_err(handle,
-			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
-			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
+		dev_err(&device->dev,
+			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
+			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
 		result = -ENODEV;
 		goto end;
 	}
@@ -511,8 +511,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 				"ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
 				"returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
 				acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
-			acpi_handle_info(handle,
-					 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
+			dev_info(&device->dev,
+				 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
 			pcie_no_aspm();
 		}
 	} else {
-- 
1.8.1.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: use dev_printk() to keep messages consistent
  2013-06-03 13:16           ` [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: use dev_printk() to keep messages consistent Jiang Liu
@ 2013-06-03 21:09             ` Bjorn Helgaas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2013-06-03 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang Liu; +Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Jiang Liu, Yijing Wang, linux-pci

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> As pointed out by Bjorn that acpi_handle_printk() generates messages
> like "ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0: xxxxx" and dev_printk() generates messages
> like "acpi PNP0A08:00: xxxx", so use dev_printk() to keep messages
> consistent when possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> ---
> Hi Bjorn,
>         Could you please help to fold this patch onto "PCI/ACPI: Use
> acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages" of branch
> "pci/jiang-remove-global-list"?

Done.  I also changed one acpi_handle_print() in
handle_root_bridge_insertion() where we do have a device.  This is in
my "next" branch for v3.11.

Thanks!

>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 73a934d..4a8f5b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>                                        &segment);
>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> -               acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> +               dev_err(&device->dev,  "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>                 result = -ENODEV;
>                 goto end;
>         }
> @@ -404,8 +404,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                  * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>                  */
>                 root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> -               acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> -                                FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> +               dev_warn(&device->dev,
> +                        FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>                 status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>                                                NULL, &bus);
>                 if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                 else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>                         root->secondary.start = 0;
>                 else {
> -                       acpi_handle_err(handle, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> +                       dev_err(&device->dev, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>                         result = -ENODEV;
>                         goto end;
>                 }
> @@ -451,9 +451,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>          */
>         root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>         if (!root->bus) {
> -               acpi_handle_err(handle,
> -                           "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> -                           root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> +               dev_err(&device->dev,
> +                       "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> +                       root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>                 result = -ENODEV;
>                 goto end;
>         }
> @@ -511,8 +511,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                                 "ACPI _OSC request failed (%s), "
>                                 "returned control mask: 0x%02x\n",
>                                 acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
> -                       acpi_handle_info(handle,
> -                                        "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> +                       dev_info(&device->dev,
> +                                "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>                         pcie_no_aspm();
>                 }
>         } else {
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c
@ 2013-05-14 12:59 Jiang Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jiang Liu @ 2013-05-14 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yinghai Lu
  Cc: Jiang Liu, Gu Zheng, Toshi Kani, Myron Stowe, Yijing Wang,
	Jiang Liu, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Len Brown, linux-acpi

Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 25 +++----------------------
 include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index b80e06e..91ddfd6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler pci_root_handler = {
 	.detach = acpi_pci_root_remove,
 };
 
-/* Lock to protect both acpi_pci_roots lists */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_pci_root_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(acpi_pci_roots);
-
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
 
 /**
@@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 		}
 	}
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&root->node);
 	root->device = device;
 	root->segment = segment & 0xFFFF;
 	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_DEVICE_NAME);
@@ -501,10 +496,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	 * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
 	 */
 
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&root->node, &acpi_pci_roots);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
 	/*
 	 * Scan the Root Bridge
 	 * --------------------
@@ -518,7 +509,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
 			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
 		result = -ENODEV;
-		goto out_del_root;
+		goto end;
 	}
 
 	/* ASPM setting */
@@ -538,20 +529,13 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
 		pcibios_resource_survey_bus(root->bus);
 		pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(root->bus);
-	}
-
-	/* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
-	if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+		/* need to after hot-added ioapic is registered */
 		pci_enable_bridges(root->bus);
+	}
 
 	pci_bus_add_devices(root->bus);
 	return 1;
 
-out_del_root:
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_del(&root->node);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-
 end:
 	kfree(root);
 	return result;
@@ -568,9 +552,6 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
 
 	pci_remove_root_bus(root->bus);
 
-	mutex_lock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
-	list_del(&root->node);
-	mutex_unlock(&acpi_pci_root_lock);
 	kfree(root);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 22ba56e..4eb9a88 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ int register_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
 int unregister_acpi_bus_type(struct acpi_bus_type *);
 
 struct acpi_pci_root {
-	struct list_head node;
 	struct acpi_device * device;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 	u16 segment;
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-03 21:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-14 13:00 [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Jiang Liu
2013-05-14 13:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages Jiang Liu
2013-05-30 17:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-30 19:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-31 16:20       ` Jiang Liu
2013-05-31 19:18         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-03 13:16           ` [PATCH] PCI, ACPI: use dev_printk() to keep messages consistent Jiang Liu
2013-06-03 21:09             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-28 22:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] ACPI, PCI: remove unused global list acpi_pci_roots in pci_root.c Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-28 23:21   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-28 23:48     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-14 12:59 Jiang Liu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.