Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On May 21, 2018, at 9:47 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 09:16:33PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 5/21/18 8:49 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 05:11:31PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>> This patch simplifies the timeout handling by relying on the request
>>>> reference counting to ensure the iterator is operating on an inflight
>>>=20
>>> The reference counting isn't free, what is the real benefit in this way?=

>>=20
>> Neither is the current scheme and locking, and this is a hell of a lot
>> simpler. I'd get rid of the kref stuff and just do a simple
>> atomic_dec_and_test(). Most of the time we should be uncontended on
>> that, which would make it pretty darn cheap. I'd be surprised if it
>> wasn't better than the current alternatives.
>=20
> The explicit memory barriers by atomic_dec_and_test() isn't free.

I=E2=80=99m not saying it=E2=80=99s free. Neither is our current synchroniza=
tion.

> Also the double completion issue need to be fixed before discussing
> this approach further.

Certainly. Also not saying that the current patch is perfect. But it=E2=80=99=
s a lot more palatable than the alternatives, hence my interest. And I=E2=80=
=99d like for this issue to get solved, we seem to be a bit stuck atm.=20


I=E2=80=99ll take a closer look tomorrow.=20