All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:14:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d060249-8503-6b68-33ed-7623f62686ae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915152129.1254-3-longpeng2@huawei.com>

Hi Longpeng,

On 2021/9/15 23:21, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> __domain_mapping() always removes the pages in the range from
> 'iov_pfn' to 'end_pfn', but the 'end_pfn' is always the last pfn
> of the range that the caller wants to map.
> 
> This would introduce too many duplicated removing and leads the
> map operation take too long, for example:
> 
>    Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
>      iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      ...
>    it takes about 50ms in total.
> 
> We can reduce the cost by recalculate the 'end_pfn' and limit it
> to the boundary of the end of the pte page.
> 
>    Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
>      iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x13ffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x17ffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x1bffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x1fffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x23ffff
>      ...
>    it only need 9ms now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>

The 0day robot reports below compiling warning when building a 32-bit
kernel (make W=1 ARCH=i386):

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

    In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:43,
                     from 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:47,
                     from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h:30,
                     from <command-line>:
    include/linux/intel-iommu.h: In function 'nr_pte_to_next_page':
 >> include/linux/intel-iommu.h:719:3: error: cast to pointer from 
integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
      719 |   (struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
          |   ^
    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


vim +719 include/linux/intel-iommu.h

    715	
    716	static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
    717	{
    718		return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
  > 719			(struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
    720	}
    721	

Can you please take a look at this?

Best regards,
baolu

> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 12 +++++++-----
>   include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  6 ++++++
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index d75f59a..87cbf34 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2354,12 +2354,18 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>   				return -ENOMEM;
>   			first_pte = pte;
>   
> +			lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> +			BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
> +
>   			/* It is large page*/
>   			if (largepage_lvl > 1) {
>   				unsigned long end_pfn;
> +				unsigned long pages_to_remove;
>   
>   				pteval |= DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> -				end_pfn = ((iov_pfn + nr_pages) & level_mask(largepage_lvl)) - 1;
> +				pages_to_remove = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
> +							nr_pte_to_next_page(pte) * lvl_pages);
> +				end_pfn = iov_pfn + pages_to_remove - 1;
>   				switch_to_super_page(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn, largepage_lvl);
>   			} else {
>   				pteval &= ~(uint64_t)DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> @@ -2381,10 +2387,6 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>   			WARN_ON(1);
>   		}
>   
> -		lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> -
> -		BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
> -
>   		nr_pages -= lvl_pages;
>   		iov_pfn += lvl_pages;
>   		phys_pfn += lvl_pages;
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index a590b00..4bff70c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -713,6 +713,12 @@ static inline bool first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
>   	return !((unsigned long)pte & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK);
>   }
>   
> +static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> +{
> +	return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
> +		(struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
> +}
> +
>   extern struct dmar_drhd_unit * dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
>   extern int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
>   
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:14:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d060249-8503-6b68-33ed-7623f62686ae@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915152129.1254-3-longpeng2@huawei.com>

Hi Longpeng,

On 2021/9/15 23:21, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> __domain_mapping() always removes the pages in the range from
> 'iov_pfn' to 'end_pfn', but the 'end_pfn' is always the last pfn
> of the range that the caller wants to map.
> 
> This would introduce too many duplicated removing and leads the
> map operation take too long, for example:
> 
>    Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
>      iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
>      ...
>    it takes about 50ms in total.
> 
> We can reduce the cost by recalculate the 'end_pfn' and limit it
> to the boundary of the end of the pte page.
> 
>    Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
>      iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x13ffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x17ffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x1bffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x1fffff
>      iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x23ffff
>      ...
>    it only need 9ms now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>

The 0day robot reports below compiling warning when building a 32-bit
kernel (make W=1 ARCH=i386):

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

    In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:43,
                     from 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:47,
                     from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h:30,
                     from <command-line>:
    include/linux/intel-iommu.h: In function 'nr_pte_to_next_page':
 >> include/linux/intel-iommu.h:719:3: error: cast to pointer from 
integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
      719 |   (struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
          |   ^
    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


vim +719 include/linux/intel-iommu.h

    715	
    716	static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
    717	{
    718		return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
  > 719			(struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
    720	}
    721	

Can you please take a look at this?

Best regards,
baolu

> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 12 +++++++-----
>   include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  6 ++++++
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index d75f59a..87cbf34 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2354,12 +2354,18 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>   				return -ENOMEM;
>   			first_pte = pte;
>   
> +			lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> +			BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
> +
>   			/* It is large page*/
>   			if (largepage_lvl > 1) {
>   				unsigned long end_pfn;
> +				unsigned long pages_to_remove;
>   
>   				pteval |= DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> -				end_pfn = ((iov_pfn + nr_pages) & level_mask(largepage_lvl)) - 1;
> +				pages_to_remove = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
> +							nr_pte_to_next_page(pte) * lvl_pages);
> +				end_pfn = iov_pfn + pages_to_remove - 1;
>   				switch_to_super_page(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn, largepage_lvl);
>   			} else {
>   				pteval &= ~(uint64_t)DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
> @@ -2381,10 +2387,6 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>   			WARN_ON(1);
>   		}
>   
> -		lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
> -
> -		BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
> -
>   		nr_pages -= lvl_pages;
>   		iov_pfn += lvl_pages;
>   		phys_pfn += lvl_pages;
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index a590b00..4bff70c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -713,6 +713,12 @@ static inline bool first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
>   	return !((unsigned long)pte & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK);
>   }
>   
> +static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> +{
> +	return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
> +		(struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
> +}
> +
>   extern struct dmar_drhd_unit * dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
>   extern int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-15 15:21 [PATCH v1 0/2] iommu/vt-d: boost the mapping process Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21 ` Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu/vt-d: convert the return type of first_pte_in_page to bool Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21   ` Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21   ` Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-30 14:14   ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-09-30 14:14     ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d060249-8503-6b68-33ed-7623f62686ae@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.