All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for driver IOMMU fault handlers
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:17:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d3c7595-0186-7231-96dc-ae52414480ee@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225175135.91922-2-jcrouse@codeaurora.org>

On 2021-02-25 17:51, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> Call report_iommu_fault() to allow upper-level drivers to register their
> own fault handlers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 9 +++++++--
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..0f3a9b5f3284 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	int idx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	fsr = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR);
>   	if (!(fsr & ARM_SMMU_FSR_FAULT))
> @@ -417,8 +418,12 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	iova = arm_smmu_cb_readq(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR);
>   	cbfrsynra = arm_smmu_gr1_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR1_CBFRSYNRA(idx));
>   
> -	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> -	"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
> +	ret = report_iommu_fault(domain, dev, iova,

Beware that "dev" here is not a struct device, so this isn't right. I'm 
not entirely sure what we *should* be passing here, since we can't 
easily attribute a context fault to a specific client device, and 
passing the IOMMU device seems a bit dubious too, so maybe just NULL?

Robin.

> +		fsynr & ARM_SMMU_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> +
> +	if (ret == -ENOSYS)
> +		dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +		"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
>   			    fsr, iova, fsynr, cbfrsynra, idx);
>   
>   	arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, fsr);
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for driver IOMMU fault handlers
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:17:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d3c7595-0186-7231-96dc-ae52414480ee@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225175135.91922-2-jcrouse@codeaurora.org>

On 2021-02-25 17:51, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> Call report_iommu_fault() to allow upper-level drivers to register their
> own fault handlers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 9 +++++++--
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..0f3a9b5f3284 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	int idx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	fsr = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR);
>   	if (!(fsr & ARM_SMMU_FSR_FAULT))
> @@ -417,8 +418,12 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	iova = arm_smmu_cb_readq(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR);
>   	cbfrsynra = arm_smmu_gr1_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR1_CBFRSYNRA(idx));
>   
> -	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> -	"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
> +	ret = report_iommu_fault(domain, dev, iova,

Beware that "dev" here is not a struct device, so this isn't right. I'm 
not entirely sure what we *should* be passing here, since we can't 
easily attribute a context fault to a specific client device, and 
passing the IOMMU device seems a bit dubious too, so maybe just NULL?

Robin.

> +		fsynr & ARM_SMMU_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> +
> +	if (ret == -ENOSYS)
> +		dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +		"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
>   			    fsr, iova, fsynr, cbfrsynra, idx);
>   
>   	arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, fsr);
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for driver IOMMU fault handlers
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:17:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d3c7595-0186-7231-96dc-ae52414480ee@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225175135.91922-2-jcrouse@codeaurora.org>

On 2021-02-25 17:51, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> Call report_iommu_fault() to allow upper-level drivers to register their
> own fault handlers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 9 +++++++--
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index d8c6bfde6a61..0f3a9b5f3284 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>   	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>   	int idx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	fsr = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR);
>   	if (!(fsr & ARM_SMMU_FSR_FAULT))
> @@ -417,8 +418,12 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
>   	iova = arm_smmu_cb_readq(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR);
>   	cbfrsynra = arm_smmu_gr1_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR1_CBFRSYNRA(idx));
>   
> -	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> -	"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
> +	ret = report_iommu_fault(domain, dev, iova,

Beware that "dev" here is not a struct device, so this isn't right. I'm 
not entirely sure what we *should* be passing here, since we can't 
easily attribute a context fault to a specific client device, and 
passing the IOMMU device seems a bit dubious too, so maybe just NULL?

Robin.

> +		fsynr & ARM_SMMU_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> +
> +	if (ret == -ENOSYS)
> +		dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +		"Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
>   			    fsr, iova, fsynr, cbfrsynra, idx);
>   
>   	arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, fsr);
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 17:51 [PATCH v3 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu: adreno-smmu page fault handling Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51 ` Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51 ` Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for driver IOMMU fault handlers Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51   ` Jordan Crouse
2021-03-02 12:17   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-03-02 12:17     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-02 12:17     ` Robin Murphy
2021-03-02 15:54     ` Jordan Crouse
2021-03-02 15:54       ` Jordan Crouse
2021-03-02 15:54       ` Jordan Crouse
2021-05-11 18:59       ` Rob Clark
2021-05-11 18:59         ` Rob Clark
2021-05-11 18:59         ` Rob Clark
2021-02-25 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/msm: Add an adreno-smmu-priv callback to get pagefault info Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51   ` Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/msm: Improve the a6xx page fault handler Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51   ` Jordan Crouse
2021-02-25 17:51   ` Jordan Crouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d3c7595-0186-7231-96dc-ae52414480ee@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcrouse@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.