All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Gunter Grau <gunter.grau@philips.com>, xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipipe: Fix ipipe level irq end
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:53:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dc61fd7-14ef-eba2-0f81-2ad74b05fd34@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210153313.2229625-2-gunter.grau@philips.com>

On 10.02.22 16:33, Gunter Grau via Xenomai wrote:
> The following commit in the vanilla kernel introduced
> a check for the cached interrupt mask flag in mask_irq():
> 
> bf22ff45bed6 ("genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls")
> 
> This means if the flag is not serviced correctly
> the real bit in the hardware interrupt controller may not be
> cleared or set.
> The __ipipe_end_level_irq() function does not follow this rule.
> It unmasks the bit in the hardware without setting the cached flags
> accordingly. So after the first level interrupt is finished the
> mask cache has a wrong state. If now the next interrupt fires,
> the mask_irq() function will not really mask the interrupt in
> the hardware which causes a interrupt storm after reenabeling
> the hard irqs.
> The fix now calls unmask_irq() which is handling the cached flags
> correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gunter Grau <gunter.grau@philips.com>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/chip.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 7c03e2931189..79a09b92a1b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ void __ipipe_ack_level_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> 
>  void __ipipe_end_level_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> -       desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
> +       unmask_irq(desc);
>  }
> 
>  void __ipipe_ack_fasteoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> --
> 2.25.1
> 

OK, so this is 4.14+, i.e. possibly our 4.19 and 5.4 ipipe trees, and
that generically. Need to check why we didn't see this in our tests so
far...

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 15:33 Issue with linux threaded level triggered interrupts Gunter Grau
2022-02-10 15:33 ` [PATCH] ipipe: Fix ipipe level irq end Gunter Grau
2022-02-10 15:37   ` Greg Gallagher
2022-02-10 15:53   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2022-02-16 21:03   ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17  8:48     ` Gunter Grau
2022-02-17  9:15       ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17 12:16         ` Grau, Gunter
2022-02-17 12:36           ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17 14:11         ` Greg Gallagher
2022-02-17 15:12           ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17 15:13             ` Greg Gallagher
2022-08-11 13:05               ` Grau, Gunter
2022-08-15  6:19                 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-08-15  9:13                   ` Grau, Gunter
2022-08-15  9:34                     ` Philippe Gerum
2022-08-15 10:27                     ` [[I-PIPE PATCH]] ipipe: noarch: Fix ipipe level end interrupt Gunter Grau
2022-08-15 11:56                       ` Jan Kiszka
2022-08-15 12:31                         ` Grau, Gunter
2022-08-15 13:54                           ` Jan Kiszka
2022-08-15 15:24                             ` Grau, Gunter
2022-08-16  6:23                               ` Jan Kiszka
2022-08-17 16:09                                 ` Grau, Gunter
2022-09-02  7:48                                 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-02-17 14:05       ` [PATCH] ipipe: Fix ipipe level irq end Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17 14:08         ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-17 14:12           ` Gunter Grau
2022-02-10 15:39 ` Issue with linux threaded level triggered interrupts Greg Gallagher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2dc61fd7-14ef-eba2-0f81-2ad74b05fd34@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=gunter.grau@philips.com \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.