From: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de> To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board. Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 16:51:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <30fd5275-6219-3068-dc22-6ae147baef4e@fivetechno.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZDSK4mJk0bkQ_e3m1=Ar+NnGZS7q8zFYJJHtZY3HeBkfw@mail.gmail.com> Hi Jagan, Am 01.11.19 um 18:18 schrieb Jagan Teki: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 10:24 PM Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de> wrote: >> >> For rk3399-roc-pc is a mezzanine board available that carries M.2 and >> POE interfaces. Use it with a separate dts. > > Thanks for the patch. Indeed have an impression to go this via overlay > rather than a separate dts since it is HAT for base board, does it > make sense? or is this the way it is handling in rockchip dts files? Please see discussion here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2019-November/027592.html Btw. it looks like there is an upcoming roc-pc-plus board with sound and other peripherals on board. That could probably use the proposed rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi, too. > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de> To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board. Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 16:51:02 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <30fd5275-6219-3068-dc22-6ae147baef4e@fivetechno.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZDSK4mJk0bkQ_e3m1=Ar+NnGZS7q8zFYJJHtZY3HeBkfw@mail.gmail.com> Hi Jagan, Am 01.11.19 um 18:18 schrieb Jagan Teki: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 10:24 PM Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de> wrote: >> >> For rk3399-roc-pc is a mezzanine board available that carries M.2 and >> POE interfaces. Use it with a separate dts. > > Thanks for the patch. Indeed have an impression to go this via overlay > rather than a separate dts since it is HAT for base board, does it > make sense? or is this the way it is handling in rockchip dts files? Please see discussion here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2019-November/027592.html Btw. it looks like there is an upcoming roc-pc-plus board with sound and other peripherals on board. That could probably use the proposed rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi, too. > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-02 15:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-11-01 16:54 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board Markus Reichl 2019-11-01 16:54 ` Markus Reichl 2019-11-01 17:18 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-01 17:18 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-02 15:51 ` Markus Reichl [this message] 2019-11-02 15:51 ` Markus Reichl 2019-11-04 12:12 ` Heiko Stübner 2019-11-04 12:12 ` Heiko Stübner 2019-11-04 12:12 ` Heiko Stübner 2019-11-18 11:44 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-18 11:44 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-18 11:57 ` Markus Reichl 2019-11-18 11:57 ` Markus Reichl 2019-11-18 12:01 ` Heiko Stübner 2019-11-18 12:01 ` Heiko Stübner 2019-11-18 12:06 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-18 12:06 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-18 12:03 ` Jagan Teki 2019-11-18 12:03 ` Jagan Teki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=30fd5275-6219-3068-dc22-6ae147baef4e@fivetechno.de \ --to=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.