* [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock
@ 2020-01-08 3:13 Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:13 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Baolin Wang
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2020-01-08 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ohad, bjorn.andersson
Cc: baolin.wang7, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
This patch set did some optimization for OMAP hwlock controller with
changing to use some devm_xxx APIs to simplify code.
Baolin Wang (3):
hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory
hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock
controller
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 45 ++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RESEND 1/3] hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
2020-01-08 3:13 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Baolin Wang
@ 2020-01-08 3:13 ` Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory Baolin Wang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2020-01-08 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ohad, bjorn.andersson
Cc: baolin.wang7, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
Use the new helper that wraps the calls to platform_get_resource()
and devm_ioremap_resource() together, which can simpify the code.
Meanwhile renaming the error label to make more sense after removing
iounmap().
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 14e1a53..dbb1a4c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
- struct resource *res;
void __iomem *io_base;
int num_locks, i, ret;
/* Only a single hwspinlock block device is supported */
@@ -85,13 +84,9 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!node)
return -ENODEV;
- res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
- if (!res)
- return -ENODEV;
-
- io_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
- if (!io_base)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(io_base))
+ return PTR_ERR(io_base);
/*
* make sure the module is enabled and clocked before reading
@@ -101,7 +96,7 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
- goto iounmap_base;
+ goto runtime_err;
}
/* Determine number of locks */
@@ -114,12 +109,12 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
ret = pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
- goto iounmap_base;
+ goto runtime_err;
/* one of the four lsb's must be set, and nothing else */
if (hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1 || i > 8) {
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto iounmap_base;
+ goto runtime_err;
}
num_locks = i * 32; /* actual number of locks in this device */
@@ -127,7 +122,7 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
bank = kzalloc(struct_size(bank, lock, num_locks), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bank) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto iounmap_base;
+ goto runtime_err;
}
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
@@ -147,16 +142,14 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
reg_fail:
kfree(bank);
-iounmap_base:
+runtime_err:
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
- iounmap(io_base);
return ret;
}
static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- void __iomem *io_base = bank->lock[0].priv - LOCK_BASE_OFFSET;
int ret;
ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
@@ -166,7 +159,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
- iounmap(io_base);
kfree(bank);
return 0;
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RESEND 2/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory
2020-01-08 3:13 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:13 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Baolin Wang
@ 2020-01-08 3:14 ` Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller Baolin Wang
2020-01-22 0:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2020-01-08 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ohad, bjorn.andersson
Cc: baolin.wang7, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory, which can simplify the error
handling.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index dbb1a4c..3b05560 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
num_locks = i * 32; /* actual number of locks in this device */
- bank = kzalloc(struct_size(bank, lock, num_locks), GFP_KERNEL);
+ bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(bank, lock, num_locks),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bank) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto runtime_err;
@@ -133,15 +134,13 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
if (ret)
- goto reg_fail;
+ goto runtime_err;
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registered %d locks with HwSpinlock core\n",
num_locks);
return 0;
-reg_fail:
- kfree(bank);
runtime_err:
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
return ret;
@@ -159,7 +158,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
- kfree(bank);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
2020-01-08 3:13 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:13 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory Baolin Wang
@ 2020-01-08 3:14 ` Baolin Wang
2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-22 0:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2020-01-08 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ohad, bjorn.andersson
Cc: baolin.wang7, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 3b05560..9e8a8c2 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
- ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
- base_id, num_locks);
+ ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
+ base_id, num_locks);
if (ret)
goto runtime_err;
@@ -148,15 +148,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int ret;
-
- ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
return 0;
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller Baolin Wang
@ 2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-01-22 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baolin Wang; +Cc: ohad, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue 07 Jan 19:14 PST 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
> unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> index 3b05560..9e8a8c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
> hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
>
> - ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> - base_id, num_locks);
> + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> + base_id, num_locks);
> if (ret)
> goto runtime_err;
>
> @@ -148,15 +148,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
Relying on devm_hwspin_lock_register() to hwspin_lock_unregister() will
mean that pm_runtime_disable() will now be called before the spinlocks
are unregistered.
Regards,
Bjorn
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
@ 2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-01-22 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baolin Wang; +Cc: ohad, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue 07 Jan 19:14 PST 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
> unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> index 3b05560..9e8a8c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
> hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
>
> - ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> - base_id, num_locks);
> + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> + base_id, num_locks);
> if (ret)
> goto runtime_err;
>
> @@ -148,15 +148,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
Relying on devm_hwspin_lock_register() to hwspin_lock_unregister() will
mean that pm_runtime_disable() will now be called before the spinlocks
are unregistered.
Regards,
Bjorn
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock
2020-01-08 3:13 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Baolin Wang
@ 2020-01-22 0:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory Baolin Wang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-01-22 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baolin Wang; +Cc: ohad, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue 07 Jan 19:13 PST 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
> This patch set did some optimization for OMAP hwlock controller with
> changing to use some devm_xxx APIs to simplify code.
>
Applied the first 2 patches, thanks.
> Baolin Wang (3):
> hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
> hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory
> hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock
> controller
>
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 45 ++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock
@ 2020-01-22 0:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2020-01-22 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baolin Wang; +Cc: ohad, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue 07 Jan 19:13 PST 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
> This patch set did some optimization for OMAP hwlock controller with
> changing to use some devm_xxx APIs to simplify code.
>
Applied the first 2 patches, thanks.
> Baolin Wang (3):
> hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
> hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory
> hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock
> controller
>
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 45 ++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller
2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
(?)
@ 2020-01-25 4:10 ` Baolin Wang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2020-01-25 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson; +Cc: Ohad Ben Cohen, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, LKML
Hi Bjorn,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:15 AM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue 07 Jan 19:14 PST 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> > Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register the hwlock controller instead of
> > unregistering the hwlock controller explicitly when removing the device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 13 ++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> > index 3b05560..9e8a8c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> > @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
> > hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
> >
> > - ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> > - base_id, num_locks);
> > + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> > + base_id, num_locks);
> > if (ret)
> > goto runtime_err;
> >
> > @@ -148,15 +148,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > static int omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > - struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
>
> Relying on devm_hwspin_lock_register() to hwspin_lock_unregister() will
> mean that pm_runtime_disable() will now be called before the spinlocks
> are unregistered.
Yes, you are right. Thanks for catching this issue.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-25 4:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-08 3:13 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:13 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] hwspinlock: omap: Change to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_kzalloc() to allocate memory Baolin Wang
2020-01-08 3:14 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() to register hwlock controller Baolin Wang
2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-22 0:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-25 4:10 ` Baolin Wang
2020-01-22 0:15 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Some improvements for OMAP hwspinlock Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-22 0:16 ` Bjorn Andersson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.