From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: swap: remove dead codes Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:08:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3272ecd0-f787-7751-3598-19ed8cb1c90f@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YL5NmfYhLEXOCYiZ@google.com> On 2021/6/8 0:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 06/07, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/6/5 7:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 06/04, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/5/27 10:12, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>> On 2021/5/27 9:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>> On 2021/5/26 21:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>>> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>>>> After commit af4b6b8edf6a ("f2fs: introduce check_swap_activate_fast()"), >>>>>>>>> we will never run into original logic of check_swap_activate() before >>>>>>>>> f2fs supports non 4k-sized page, so let's delete those dead codes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not keeping this for large page support in future maybe? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, if so, at that time, it would be better to refactor >>>>>>> check_swap_activate_fast() implementation based on f2fs_map_block() rather >>>>>>> than refactoring check_swap_activate() implementation based on low efficient >>>>>>> bmap()? >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's first check whether we support large page. Have you quickly tested it? >>>>>> If we support it now and current flow is just inefficient, I'd say keeping but >>>>>> refactoring it later. >>>>> >>>>> Let me check this, but I guess it missed to handle large page in lots of flows, >>>>> not sure where we may panic at... :( >>>> >>>> I've checked f2fs behavior on 64kb page size in arm64 vm, >>>> - 'ls -ls' will cause f2fs printing "invalid namelen(0), ino:%u, run fsck >>>> to fix." each time. >>>> - after touch a file and umount, fsck reports that image is corrupted. >>>> >>>> F2FS uses PAGE_SIZE and F2FS_BLKSIZE directly in a lot of places, I doubt >>>> most of places may not consider large page size condition. >>>> >>>> So, thoughts? I guess we have to admit we do not support 64KB page right >>>> now... :P >>> >>> Yeah, we need to block the large page support unfortunately. :( >> >> Could you please queue this series in dev-test? >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 171 +------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> index 3058c7e28b11..9c23fde93b76 100644 >>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> @@ -3830,67 +3830,7 @@ int f2fs_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping, >>>>>>>>> #endif >>>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP >>>>>>>>> -static int f2fs_is_file_aligned(struct inode *inode) >>>>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); >>>>>>>>> - block_t main_blkaddr = SM_I(sbi)->main_blkaddr; >>>>>>>>> - block_t cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - block_t last_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - block_t pblock; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned long nr_pblocks; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned int blocks_per_sec = BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi); >>>>>>>>> - unsigned int not_aligned = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cur_lblock = 0; >>>>>>>>> - last_lblock = bytes_to_blks(inode, i_size_read(inode)); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - while (cur_lblock < last_lblock) { >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_map_blocks map; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - memset(&map, 0, sizeof(map)); >>>>>>>>> - map.m_lblk = cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_len = last_lblock - cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_next_pgofs = NULL; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_next_extent = NULL; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_seg_type = NO_CHECK_TYPE; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_may_create = false; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - ret = f2fs_map_blocks(inode, &map, 0, F2FS_GET_BLOCK_FIEMAP); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* hole */ >>>>>>>>> - if (!(map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_FLAGS)) { >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile has holes\n"); >>>>>>>>> - ret = -ENOENT; >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - pblock = map.m_pblk; >>>>>>>>> - nr_pblocks = map.m_len; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if ((pblock - main_blkaddr) & (blocks_per_sec - 1) || >>>>>>>>> - nr_pblocks & (blocks_per_sec - 1)) { >>>>>>>>> - if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)) { >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile does not align to section"); >>>>>>>>> - ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - not_aligned++; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cur_lblock += nr_pblocks; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - if (not_aligned) >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_warn(sbi, "Swapfile (%u) is not align to section: \n" >>>>>>>>> - "\t1) creat(), 2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE), 3) fallocate()", >>>>>>>>> - not_aligned); >>>>>>>>> -out: >>>>>>>>> - return ret; >>>>>>>>> -} >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> -static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> +static int check_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> struct file *swap_file, sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>> struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping; >>>>>>>>> @@ -3907,6 +3847,8 @@ static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> unsigned int not_aligned = 0; >>>>>>>>> int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PAGE_SIZE != F2FS_BLKSIZE); > > Let me remove this, since we have this actually. Looks fine to me. Thanks, > > in init_f2fs_fs(), > > if (PAGE_SIZE != F2FS_BLKSIZE) { > printk("F2FS not supported on PAGE_SIZE(%lu) != %d\n", > PAGE_SIZE, F2FS_BLKSIZE); > return -EINVAL; > } > > > >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> /* >>>>>>>>> * Map all the blocks into the extent list. This code doesn't try >>>>>>>>> * to be very smart. >>>>>>>>> @@ -3986,113 +3928,6 @@ static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> return ret; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> -/* Copied from generic_swapfile_activate() to check any holes */ >>>>>>>>> -static int check_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> - struct file *swap_file, sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>>>> - struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping; >>>>>>>>> - struct inode *inode = mapping->host; >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); >>>>>>>>> - unsigned blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned long page_no; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t probe_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t last_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t lowest_block = -1; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t highest_block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int nr_extents = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if (PAGE_SIZE == F2FS_BLKSIZE) >>>>>>>>> - return check_swap_activate_fast(sis, swap_file, span); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - ret = f2fs_is_file_aligned(inode); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - blocks_per_page = bytes_to_blks(inode, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * Map all the blocks into the extent list. This code doesn't try >>>>>>>>> - * to be very smart. >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - probe_block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - page_no = 0; >>>>>>>>> - last_block = bytes_to_blks(inode, i_size_read(inode)); >>>>>>>>> - while ((probe_block + blocks_per_page) <= last_block && >>>>>>>>> - page_no < sis->max) { >>>>>>>>> - unsigned block_in_page; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t first_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cond_resched(); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - block = probe_block; >>>>>>>>> - ret = bmap(inode, &block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - if (!block) >>>>>>>>> - goto bad_bmap; >>>>>>>>> - first_block = block; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * It must be PAGE_SIZE aligned on-disk >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block & (blocks_per_page - 1)) { >>>>>>>>> - probe_block++; >>>>>>>>> - goto reprobe; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - for (block_in_page = 1; block_in_page < blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> - block_in_page++) { >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - block = probe_block + block_in_page; >>>>>>>>> - ret = bmap(inode, &block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - if (!block) >>>>>>>>> - goto bad_bmap; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if (block != first_block + block_in_page) { >>>>>>>>> - /* Discontiguity */ >>>>>>>>> - probe_block++; >>>>>>>>> - goto reprobe; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - first_block >>= (PAGE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits); >>>>>>>>> - if (page_no) { /* exclude the header page */ >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block < lowest_block) >>>>>>>>> - lowest_block = first_block; >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block > highest_block) >>>>>>>>> - highest_block = first_block; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * We found a PAGE_SIZE-length, PAGE_SIZE-aligned run of blocks >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - ret = add_swap_extent(sis, page_no, 1, first_block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret < 0) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - nr_extents += ret; >>>>>>>>> - page_no++; >>>>>>>>> - probe_block += blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> -reprobe: >>>>>>>>> - continue; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - ret = nr_extents; >>>>>>>>> - *span = 1 + highest_block - lowest_block; >>>>>>>>> - if (page_no == 0) >>>>>>>>> - page_no = 1; /* force Empty message */ >>>>>>>>> - sis->max = page_no; >>>>>>>>> - sis->pages = page_no - 1; >>>>>>>>> - sis->highest_bit = page_no - 1; >>>>>>>>> -out: >>>>>>>>> - return ret; >>>>>>>>> -bad_bmap: >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile has holes\n"); >>>>>>>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>>>>>>> -} >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> static int f2fs_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, struct file *file, >>>>>>>>> sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> 2.29.2 >>>>>> . >>>>>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: swap: remove dead codes Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:08:50 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3272ecd0-f787-7751-3598-19ed8cb1c90f@kernel.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YL5NmfYhLEXOCYiZ@google.com> On 2021/6/8 0:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 06/07, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/6/5 7:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 06/04, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/5/27 10:12, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>> On 2021/5/27 9:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>> On 2021/5/26 21:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>>> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>>>>> After commit af4b6b8edf6a ("f2fs: introduce check_swap_activate_fast()"), >>>>>>>>> we will never run into original logic of check_swap_activate() before >>>>>>>>> f2fs supports non 4k-sized page, so let's delete those dead codes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not keeping this for large page support in future maybe? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, if so, at that time, it would be better to refactor >>>>>>> check_swap_activate_fast() implementation based on f2fs_map_block() rather >>>>>>> than refactoring check_swap_activate() implementation based on low efficient >>>>>>> bmap()? >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's first check whether we support large page. Have you quickly tested it? >>>>>> If we support it now and current flow is just inefficient, I'd say keeping but >>>>>> refactoring it later. >>>>> >>>>> Let me check this, but I guess it missed to handle large page in lots of flows, >>>>> not sure where we may panic at... :( >>>> >>>> I've checked f2fs behavior on 64kb page size in arm64 vm, >>>> - 'ls -ls' will cause f2fs printing "invalid namelen(0), ino:%u, run fsck >>>> to fix." each time. >>>> - after touch a file and umount, fsck reports that image is corrupted. >>>> >>>> F2FS uses PAGE_SIZE and F2FS_BLKSIZE directly in a lot of places, I doubt >>>> most of places may not consider large page size condition. >>>> >>>> So, thoughts? I guess we have to admit we do not support 64KB page right >>>> now... :P >>> >>> Yeah, we need to block the large page support unfortunately. :( >> >> Could you please queue this series in dev-test? >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 171 +------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> index 3058c7e28b11..9c23fde93b76 100644 >>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c >>>>>>>>> @@ -3830,67 +3830,7 @@ int f2fs_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping, >>>>>>>>> #endif >>>>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP >>>>>>>>> -static int f2fs_is_file_aligned(struct inode *inode) >>>>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); >>>>>>>>> - block_t main_blkaddr = SM_I(sbi)->main_blkaddr; >>>>>>>>> - block_t cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - block_t last_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - block_t pblock; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned long nr_pblocks; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned int blocks_per_sec = BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi); >>>>>>>>> - unsigned int not_aligned = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cur_lblock = 0; >>>>>>>>> - last_lblock = bytes_to_blks(inode, i_size_read(inode)); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - while (cur_lblock < last_lblock) { >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_map_blocks map; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - memset(&map, 0, sizeof(map)); >>>>>>>>> - map.m_lblk = cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_len = last_lblock - cur_lblock; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_next_pgofs = NULL; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_next_extent = NULL; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_seg_type = NO_CHECK_TYPE; >>>>>>>>> - map.m_may_create = false; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - ret = f2fs_map_blocks(inode, &map, 0, F2FS_GET_BLOCK_FIEMAP); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* hole */ >>>>>>>>> - if (!(map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_FLAGS)) { >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile has holes\n"); >>>>>>>>> - ret = -ENOENT; >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - pblock = map.m_pblk; >>>>>>>>> - nr_pblocks = map.m_len; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if ((pblock - main_blkaddr) & (blocks_per_sec - 1) || >>>>>>>>> - nr_pblocks & (blocks_per_sec - 1)) { >>>>>>>>> - if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)) { >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile does not align to section"); >>>>>>>>> - ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - not_aligned++; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cur_lblock += nr_pblocks; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - if (not_aligned) >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_warn(sbi, "Swapfile (%u) is not align to section: \n" >>>>>>>>> - "\t1) creat(), 2) ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SET_PIN_FILE), 3) fallocate()", >>>>>>>>> - not_aligned); >>>>>>>>> -out: >>>>>>>>> - return ret; >>>>>>>>> -} >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> -static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> +static int check_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> struct file *swap_file, sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>> struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping; >>>>>>>>> @@ -3907,6 +3847,8 @@ static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> unsigned int not_aligned = 0; >>>>>>>>> int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PAGE_SIZE != F2FS_BLKSIZE); > > Let me remove this, since we have this actually. Looks fine to me. Thanks, > > in init_f2fs_fs(), > > if (PAGE_SIZE != F2FS_BLKSIZE) { > printk("F2FS not supported on PAGE_SIZE(%lu) != %d\n", > PAGE_SIZE, F2FS_BLKSIZE); > return -EINVAL; > } > > > >>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> /* >>>>>>>>> * Map all the blocks into the extent list. This code doesn't try >>>>>>>>> * to be very smart. >>>>>>>>> @@ -3986,113 +3928,6 @@ static int check_swap_activate_fast(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> return ret; >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> -/* Copied from generic_swapfile_activate() to check any holes */ >>>>>>>>> -static int check_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, >>>>>>>>> - struct file *swap_file, sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> -{ >>>>>>>>> - struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping; >>>>>>>>> - struct inode *inode = mapping->host; >>>>>>>>> - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); >>>>>>>>> - unsigned blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> - unsigned long page_no; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t probe_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t last_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t lowest_block = -1; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t highest_block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int nr_extents = 0; >>>>>>>>> - int ret = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if (PAGE_SIZE == F2FS_BLKSIZE) >>>>>>>>> - return check_swap_activate_fast(sis, swap_file, span); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - ret = f2fs_is_file_aligned(inode); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - blocks_per_page = bytes_to_blks(inode, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * Map all the blocks into the extent list. This code doesn't try >>>>>>>>> - * to be very smart. >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - probe_block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - page_no = 0; >>>>>>>>> - last_block = bytes_to_blks(inode, i_size_read(inode)); >>>>>>>>> - while ((probe_block + blocks_per_page) <= last_block && >>>>>>>>> - page_no < sis->max) { >>>>>>>>> - unsigned block_in_page; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t first_block; >>>>>>>>> - sector_t block = 0; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - cond_resched(); >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - block = probe_block; >>>>>>>>> - ret = bmap(inode, &block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - if (!block) >>>>>>>>> - goto bad_bmap; >>>>>>>>> - first_block = block; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * It must be PAGE_SIZE aligned on-disk >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block & (blocks_per_page - 1)) { >>>>>>>>> - probe_block++; >>>>>>>>> - goto reprobe; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - for (block_in_page = 1; block_in_page < blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> - block_in_page++) { >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - block = probe_block + block_in_page; >>>>>>>>> - ret = bmap(inode, &block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - if (!block) >>>>>>>>> - goto bad_bmap; >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - if (block != first_block + block_in_page) { >>>>>>>>> - /* Discontiguity */ >>>>>>>>> - probe_block++; >>>>>>>>> - goto reprobe; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - first_block >>= (PAGE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits); >>>>>>>>> - if (page_no) { /* exclude the header page */ >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block < lowest_block) >>>>>>>>> - lowest_block = first_block; >>>>>>>>> - if (first_block > highest_block) >>>>>>>>> - highest_block = first_block; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> - /* >>>>>>>>> - * We found a PAGE_SIZE-length, PAGE_SIZE-aligned run of blocks >>>>>>>>> - */ >>>>>>>>> - ret = add_swap_extent(sis, page_no, 1, first_block); >>>>>>>>> - if (ret < 0) >>>>>>>>> - goto out; >>>>>>>>> - nr_extents += ret; >>>>>>>>> - page_no++; >>>>>>>>> - probe_block += blocks_per_page; >>>>>>>>> -reprobe: >>>>>>>>> - continue; >>>>>>>>> - } >>>>>>>>> - ret = nr_extents; >>>>>>>>> - *span = 1 + highest_block - lowest_block; >>>>>>>>> - if (page_no == 0) >>>>>>>>> - page_no = 1; /* force Empty message */ >>>>>>>>> - sis->max = page_no; >>>>>>>>> - sis->pages = page_no - 1; >>>>>>>>> - sis->highest_bit = page_no - 1; >>>>>>>>> -out: >>>>>>>>> - return ret; >>>>>>>>> -bad_bmap: >>>>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "Swapfile has holes\n"); >>>>>>>>> - return -EINVAL; >>>>>>>>> -} >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> static int f2fs_swap_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis, struct file *file, >>>>>>>>> sector_t *span) >>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> 2.29.2 >>>>>> . >>>>>> _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 23:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-26 6:29 Chao Yu 2021-05-26 6:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-05-26 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: swap: support migrating swapfile in aligned write mode Chao Yu 2021-05-26 6:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-05-26 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: swap: remove dead codes Jaegeuk Kim 2021-05-26 13:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim 2021-05-26 15:02 ` Chao Yu 2021-05-26 15:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-05-27 1:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim 2021-05-27 1:40 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim 2021-05-27 2:12 ` Chao Yu 2021-05-27 2:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-06-04 11:12 ` Chao Yu 2021-06-04 11:12 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-06-04 23:51 ` Jaegeuk Kim 2021-06-04 23:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim 2021-06-07 15:14 ` Chao Yu 2021-06-07 15:14 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu 2021-06-07 16:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim 2021-06-07 16:47 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim 2021-06-07 23:08 ` Chao Yu [this message] 2021-06-07 23:08 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=3272ecd0-f787-7751-3598-19ed8cb1c90f@kernel.org \ --to=chao@kernel.org \ --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: swap: remove dead codes' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.