* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
@ 2021-01-27 6:50 Juston Li
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg() Juston Li
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Juston Li @ 2021-01-27 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, seanpaul
From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
The HDCP 1.4 spec does not require the QUERY_STREAM_ENCRYPTION_STATUS
check, it was always a nice-to-have. After deploying this across various
devices, we've determined that some MST bridge chips do not properly
support this call for HDCP 1.4 (namely Synaptics and Realtek).
I had considered creating a quirk for this, but I think it's more
prudent to just disable the check entirely since I don't have an idea
how widespread support is.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210106223909.34476-1-sean@poorly.run #v1
Changes in v2:
-Rebased on -tip
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 12 +-----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
index f372e25edab4..4dba5bb15af5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
@@ -722,16 +722,6 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
return reply.auth_completed && reply.encryption_enabled;
}
-static
-bool intel_dp_mst_hdcp_check_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
- struct intel_connector *connector)
-{
- if (!intel_dp_hdcp_check_link(dig_port, connector))
- return false;
-
- return intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(dig_port, connector);
-}
-
static int
intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_stream_encryption(struct intel_connector *connector,
bool enable)
@@ -805,7 +795,7 @@ static const struct intel_hdcp_shim intel_dp_mst_hdcp_shim = {
.read_v_prime_part = intel_dp_hdcp_read_v_prime_part,
.toggle_signalling = intel_dp_hdcp_toggle_signalling,
.stream_encryption = intel_dp_mst_hdcp_stream_encryption,
- .check_link = intel_dp_mst_hdcp_check_link,
+ .check_link = intel_dp_hdcp_check_link,
.hdcp_capable = intel_dp_hdcp_capable,
.write_2_2_msg = intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg,
.read_2_2_msg = intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg,
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 6:50 ` Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:17 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info Juston Li
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Juston Li @ 2021-01-27 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
Update cp_irq_count_cached when we handle reading the messages rather
than writing a message to make sure the value is up to date and not
stale from a previously handled CP_IRQ. AKE flow doesn't always respond
to a read with a write msg.
E.g. currently AKE_Send_Pairing_Info will "timeout" because we received
a CP_IRQ for reading AKE_Send_H_Prime but no write occurred between that
and reading AKE_Send_Pairing_Info so cp_irq_count_cached is stale
causing the wait to return right away rather than waiting for a new
CP_IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
index 4dba5bb15af5..d1397af97f69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
@@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ static
int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
void *buf, size_t size)
{
- struct intel_dp *dp = &dig_port->dp;
- struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &dp->attached_connector->hdcp;
unsigned int offset;
u8 *byte = buf;
ssize_t ret, bytes_to_write, len;
@@ -459,8 +457,6 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
bytes_to_write = size - 1;
byte++;
- hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
-
while (bytes_to_write) {
len = bytes_to_write > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES : bytes_to_write;
@@ -509,6 +505,8 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
u8 msg_id, void *buf, size_t size)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
+ struct intel_dp *dp = &dig_port->dp;
+ struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &dp->attached_connector->hdcp;
unsigned int offset;
u8 *byte = buf;
ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
@@ -523,6 +521,8 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
+
if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
if (ret < 0)
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg() Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 6:50 ` Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:24 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST Juston Li
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Juston Li @ 2021-01-27 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
Previously when reading Send_Pairing_Info, RxInfo by itself was read
once to retrieve the DEVICE_COUNT and then a second time when reading
the RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List which contains RxInfo.
On a couple HDCP 2.2 docks, this second read attempt on RxInfo fails
due to no Ack response. This behavior doesn't seem to be defined but
regardless we can fix it by reading RxInfo once and storing it before
reading the rest of RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List once we know the
size.
Modify get_receiver_id_list_size() to read and store RxInfo in the
message buffer and also parse DEVICE_COUNT so we know the size of
RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List.
Afterwards, retrieve the rest of the message at the offset for
seq_num_V.
Changes in v2:
- remove unnecessary moving of drm_i915_private from patch 1
Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 29 ++++++++++----------
include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
index d1397af97f69..cd183944bc5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
@@ -475,11 +475,10 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
}
static
-ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
+ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, u32 *dev_cnt, u8 *byte)
{
- u8 rx_info[HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN];
- u32 dev_cnt;
ssize_t ret;
+ u8 *rx_info = byte;
ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dig_port->dp.aux,
DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET,
@@ -487,15 +486,11 @@ ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN)
return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
- dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
+ *dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_LO(rx_info[1]));
- if (dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
- dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
-
- ret = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
- HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
- (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
+ if (*dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
+ *dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
return ret;
}
@@ -511,6 +506,7 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
u8 *byte = buf;
ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data *hdcp2_msg_data;
+ u32 dev_cnt;
hdcp2_msg_data = get_hdcp2_dp_msg_data(msg_id);
if (!hdcp2_msg_data)
@@ -523,17 +519,22 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
+ /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
+ byte++;
+
if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
- ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
+ ret = get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(dig_port, &dev_cnt, byte);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- size = ret;
+ byte += ret;
+ size = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
+ HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN - HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
+ (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
}
- bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
/* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
- byte++;
+ bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
while (bytes_to_recv) {
len = bytes_to_recv > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
index edffd1dcca3e..3b42392394ba 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
@@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ enum drm_dp_phy {
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RN_OFFSET
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_LPRIME_OFFSET
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_EDKEY_KS_OFFSET
-#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET
+#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_V_OFFSET
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_V_OFFSET
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_M_OFFSET
#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY_OFFSET DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_MPRIME_OFFSET
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg() Juston Li
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 6:50 ` Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:28 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 " Patchwork
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Juston Li @ 2021-01-27 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
Like the patch to disable QSES for HDCP 1.4 over MST
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/415297/ the HDCP2.2 spec
doesn't require QSES as well and we've seen QSES not supported on a
couple HDCP2.2 docks so far (Dell WD19 and Lenovo LDC-G2)
Remove it for now until we get a better idea of how widely supported
QSES is and how to support it optionally.
Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 31 +-------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
index cd183944bc5a..5e9d0d8f7f84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
@@ -699,30 +699,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_hdcp_stream_encryption(struct intel_connector *connector,
return 0;
}
-static bool intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
- struct intel_connector *connector)
-{
- struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
- struct drm_dp_query_stream_enc_status_ack_reply reply;
- struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
- int ret;
-
- ret = drm_dp_send_query_stream_enc_status(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
- connector->port, &reply);
- if (ret) {
- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
- "[%s:%d] failed QSES ret=%d\n",
- connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id, ret);
- return false;
- }
-
- drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[%s:%d] QSES stream auth: %d stream enc: %d\n",
- connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id,
- reply.auth_completed, reply.encryption_enabled);
-
- return reply.auth_completed && reply.encryption_enabled;
-}
-
static int
intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_stream_encryption(struct intel_connector *connector,
bool enable)
@@ -758,11 +734,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_stream_encryption(struct intel_connector *connector,
return 0;
}
-/*
- * DP v2.0 I.3.3 ignore the stream signature L' in QSES reply msg reply.
- * I.3.5 MST source device may use a QSES msg to query downstream status
- * for a particular stream.
- */
static
int intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_check_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
struct intel_connector *connector)
@@ -782,7 +753,7 @@ int intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_check_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
return ret;
}
- return intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(dig_port, connector) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
}
static const struct intel_hdcp_shim intel_dp_mst_hdcp_shim = {
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 7:17 ` Patchwork
2021-01-27 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-27 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juston Li; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
-
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:261:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_pf2vf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1399:25: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1399:25: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1399:25: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1400:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1400:17: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1400:17: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1459:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1459:17: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c:1459:17: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:284:16: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different type sizes):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:284:16: unsigned long *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:284:16: unsigned long long *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:276:25: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:276:25: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:276:25: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:277:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:277:17: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:277:17: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:331:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:331:17: struct dma_fence *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c:331:17: struct dma_fence [noderef] __rcu *
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.h:92:56: error: marked inline, but without a definition
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgv_sriovmsg.h:257:49: error: static assertion failed: "amd_sriov_msg_vf2pf_info must be 1 KB"
+drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/a
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg() Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 7:17 ` Gupta, Anshuman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Juston, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:21 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; Gupta, Anshuman
> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>;
> Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in
> intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
>
> Update cp_irq_count_cached when we handle reading the messages rather
> than writing a message to make sure the value is up to date and not stale
> from a previously handled CP_IRQ. AKE flow doesn't always respond to a
> read with a write msg.
>
> E.g. currently AKE_Send_Pairing_Info will "timeout" because we received a
> CP_IRQ for reading AKE_Send_H_Prime but no write occurred between that
> and reading AKE_Send_Pairing_Info so cp_irq_count_cached is stale
> causing the wait to return right away rather than waiting for a new CP_IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> index 4dba5bb15af5..d1397af97f69 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> @@ -442,8 +442,6 @@ static
> int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> void *buf, size_t size)
> {
> - struct intel_dp *dp = &dig_port->dp;
> - struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &dp->attached_connector->hdcp;
> unsigned int offset;
> u8 *byte = buf;
> ssize_t ret, bytes_to_write, len;
> @@ -459,8 +457,6 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> bytes_to_write = size - 1;
> byte++;
>
> - hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
> -
> while (bytes_to_write) {
> len = bytes_to_write > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
> DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES :
> bytes_to_write; @@ -509,6 +505,8 @@ int
> intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> u8 msg_id, void *buf, size_t size) {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + struct intel_dp *dp = &dig_port->dp;
> + struct intel_hdcp *hdcp = &dp->attached_connector->hdcp;
> unsigned int offset;
> u8 *byte = buf;
> ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
> @@ -523,6 +521,8 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
> +
We can get a CP_IRQ even before caching it that may timeout the CP_IRQ wait but that is not an issue,
I would have slightly conservative to remove it from intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg
and update the cp_irq_count_cached after reading the AKE_SEND_HPRIME.
Either way
Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
> ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 7:24 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Gupta, Anshuman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Juston, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:21 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; Gupta, Anshuman
> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>;
> Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading
> Send_Pairing_Info
>
> Previously when reading Send_Pairing_Info, RxInfo by itself was read once
> to retrieve the DEVICE_COUNT and then a second time when reading the
> RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List which contains RxInfo.
>
> On a couple HDCP 2.2 docks, this second read attempt on RxInfo fails due to
> no Ack response. This behavior doesn't seem to be defined but regardless
> we can fix it by reading RxInfo once and storing it before reading the rest of
> RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List once we know the size.
>
> Modify get_receiver_id_list_size() to read and store RxInfo in the message
> buffer and also parse DEVICE_COUNT so we know the size of
> RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List.
>
> Afterwards, retrieve the rest of the message at the offset for seq_num_V.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - remove unnecessary moving of drm_i915_private from patch 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 29 ++++++++++----------
> include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> index d1397af97f69..cd183944bc5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> @@ -475,11 +475,10 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port, }
>
> static
> -ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> +ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(struct intel_digital_port
> +*dig_port, u32 *dev_cnt, u8 *byte)
> {
> - u8 rx_info[HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN];
> - u32 dev_cnt;
> ssize_t ret;
> + u8 *rx_info = byte;
>
> ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dig_port->dp.aux,
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET, @@ -
> 487,15 +486,11 @@ ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN)
> return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
>
> - dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> + *dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_LO(rx_info[1]));
>
> - if (dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> - dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
> -
> - ret = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> - HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> - (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> + if (*dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> + *dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -511,6 +506,7 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> u8 *byte = buf;
> ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
> const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data *hdcp2_msg_data;
> + u32 dev_cnt;
>
> hdcp2_msg_data = get_hdcp2_dp_msg_data(msg_id);
> if (!hdcp2_msg_data)
> @@ -523,17 +519,22 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>
> hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
>
> + /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
> + byte++;
> +
> if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
> - ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
> + ret = get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(dig_port, &dev_cnt,
> byte);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - size = ret;
> + byte += ret;
> + size = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> + HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN -
> HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> + (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> }
> - bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
>
> /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
Please remove this comment.
With that
Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> - byte++;
> + bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
>
> while (bytes_to_recv) {
> len = bytes_to_recv > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index edffd1dcca3e..3b42392394ba 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ enum drm_dp_phy {
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RN_OFFSET
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_LPRIME_OFFSET
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_EDKEY_KS_OFFSET
> -#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET
> +#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_V_OFFSET
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_V_OFFSET
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_M_OFFSET
> #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY_OFFSET
> DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_MPRIME_OFFSET
> --
> 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST Juston Li
@ 2021-01-27 7:28 ` Gupta, Anshuman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Juston, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul
Looks Good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:21 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; Gupta, Anshuman
> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>;
> Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for
> HDCP2.2 over MST
>
> Like the patch to disable QSES for HDCP 1.4 over MST
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/415297/ the HDCP2.2 spec
> doesn't require QSES as well and we've seen QSES not supported on a
> couple HDCP2.2 docks so far (Dell WD19 and Lenovo LDC-G2)
>
> Remove it for now until we get a better idea of how widely supported QSES
> is and how to support it optionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 31 +-------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> index cd183944bc5a..5e9d0d8f7f84 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> @@ -699,30 +699,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_hdcp_stream_encryption(struct
> intel_connector *connector,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(struct intel_digital_port
> *dig_port,
> - struct intel_connector *connector)
> -{
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> - struct drm_dp_query_stream_enc_status_ack_reply reply;
> - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp;
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = drm_dp_send_query_stream_enc_status(&intel_dp-
> >mst_mgr,
> - connector->port, &reply);
> - if (ret) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> - "[%s:%d] failed QSES ret=%d\n",
> - connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id,
> ret);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[%s:%d] QSES stream auth: %d stream
> enc: %d\n",
> - connector->base.name, connector->base.base.id,
> - reply.auth_completed, reply.encryption_enabled);
> -
> - return reply.auth_completed && reply.encryption_enabled;
> -}
> -
> static int
> intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_stream_encryption(struct intel_connector
> *connector,
> bool enable)
> @@ -758,11 +734,6 @@ intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_stream_encryption(struct
> intel_connector *connector,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * DP v2.0 I.3.3 ignore the stream signature L' in QSES reply msg reply.
> - * I.3.5 MST source device may use a QSES msg to query downstream
> status
> - * for a particular stream.
> - */
> static
> int intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_check_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> struct intel_connector *connector) @@ -
> 782,7 +753,7 @@ int intel_dp_mst_hdcp2_check_link(struct
> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return intel_dp_mst_get_qses_status(dig_port, connector) ? 0 : -
> EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct intel_hdcp_shim intel_dp_mst_hdcp_shim = {
> --
> 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-27 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 " Patchwork
@ 2021-01-27 7:46 ` Patchwork
2021-01-27 11:14 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 17:05 ` Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-27 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juston Li; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3380 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19513 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_19513, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19513:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bxt-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2426])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][7] +1 similar issue
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-jsl-1 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf90167ec8d8 drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
0f5367aacba6 drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
c03a6673e642 drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
69e116124dea drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4162 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
2021-01-27 7:24 ` Gupta, Anshuman
@ 2021-01-27 8:52 ` Gupta, Anshuman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Juston, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul, dri-devel
Please also send this patch to dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org as well because this is a drm change.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gupta, Anshuman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:55 PM
> To: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading
> Send_Pairing_Info
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:21 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; Gupta, Anshuman
> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>;
> > C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>; Li, Juston
> > <juston.li@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading
> > Send_Pairing_Info
> >
> > Previously when reading Send_Pairing_Info, RxInfo by itself was read
> > once to retrieve the DEVICE_COUNT and then a second time when reading
> > the RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List which contains RxInfo.
> >
> > On a couple HDCP 2.2 docks, this second read attempt on RxInfo fails
> > due to no Ack response. This behavior doesn't seem to be defined but
> > regardless we can fix it by reading RxInfo once and storing it before
> > reading the rest of RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List once we know the
> size.
> >
> > Modify get_receiver_id_list_size() to read and store RxInfo in the
> > message buffer and also parse DEVICE_COUNT so we know the size of
> > RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List.
> >
> > Afterwards, retrieve the rest of the message at the offset for seq_num_V.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - remove unnecessary moving of drm_i915_private from patch 1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 29 ++++++++++----------
> > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > index d1397af97f69..cd183944bc5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > @@ -475,11 +475,10 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port, }
> >
> > static
> > -ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct intel_digital_port
> > *dig_port)
> > +ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(struct intel_digital_port
> > +*dig_port, u32 *dev_cnt, u8 *byte)
> > {
> > - u8 rx_info[HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN];
> > - u32 dev_cnt;
> > ssize_t ret;
> > + u8 *rx_info = byte;
> >
> > ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dig_port->dp.aux,
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET, @@ -
> > 487,15 +486,11 @@ ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> > if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN)
> > return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
> >
> > - dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> > + *dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> > HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_LO(rx_info[1]));
> >
> > - if (dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> > - dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
> > -
> > - ret = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> > - HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> > - (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> > + if (*dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> > + *dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -511,6 +506,7 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > u8 *byte = buf;
> > ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
> > const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data *hdcp2_msg_data;
> > + u32 dev_cnt;
> >
> > hdcp2_msg_data = get_hdcp2_dp_msg_data(msg_id);
> > if (!hdcp2_msg_data)
> > @@ -523,17 +519,22 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> >
> > hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
> >
> > + /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
> > + byte++;
> > +
> > if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
> > - ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
> > + ret = get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(dig_port, &dev_cnt,
> > byte);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - size = ret;
> > + byte += ret;
> > + size = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> > + HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN -
> > HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> > + (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> > }
> > - bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
> >
> > /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
> Please remove this comment.
> With that
> Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > - byte++;
> > + bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
> >
> > while (bytes_to_recv) {
> > len = bytes_to_recv > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > index edffd1dcca3e..3b42392394ba 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ enum drm_dp_phy { #define
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RN_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_LPRIME_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_EDKEY_KS_OFFSET
> > -#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET
> > +#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_V_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_V_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_M_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_MPRIME_OFFSET
> > --
> > 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
@ 2021-01-27 8:52 ` Gupta, Anshuman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li, Juston, intel-gfx; +Cc: seanpaul, dri-devel
Please also send this patch to dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org as well because this is a drm change.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gupta, Anshuman
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:55 PM
> To: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading
> Send_Pairing_Info
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 12:21 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: seanpaul@chromium.org; Gupta, Anshuman
> <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>;
> > C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>; Li, Juston
> > <juston.li@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading
> > Send_Pairing_Info
> >
> > Previously when reading Send_Pairing_Info, RxInfo by itself was read
> > once to retrieve the DEVICE_COUNT and then a second time when reading
> > the RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List which contains RxInfo.
> >
> > On a couple HDCP 2.2 docks, this second read attempt on RxInfo fails
> > due to no Ack response. This behavior doesn't seem to be defined but
> > regardless we can fix it by reading RxInfo once and storing it before
> > reading the rest of RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List once we know the
> size.
> >
> > Modify get_receiver_id_list_size() to read and store RxInfo in the
> > message buffer and also parse DEVICE_COUNT so we know the size of
> > RepeaterAuth_Send_ReceiverID_List.
> >
> > Afterwards, retrieve the rest of the message at the offset for seq_num_V.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - remove unnecessary moving of drm_i915_private from patch 1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 29 ++++++++++----------
> > include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > index d1397af97f69..cd183944bc5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c
> > @@ -475,11 +475,10 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_write_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port, }
> >
> > static
> > -ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct intel_digital_port
> > *dig_port)
> > +ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(struct intel_digital_port
> > +*dig_port, u32 *dev_cnt, u8 *byte)
> > {
> > - u8 rx_info[HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN];
> > - u32 dev_cnt;
> > ssize_t ret;
> > + u8 *rx_info = byte;
> >
> > ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&dig_port->dp.aux,
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET, @@ -
> > 487,15 +486,11 @@ ssize_t get_receiver_id_list_size(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> > if (ret != HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN)
> > return ret >= 0 ? -EIO : ret;
> >
> > - dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> > + *dev_cnt = (HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_HI(rx_info[0]) << 4 |
> > HDCP_2_2_DEV_COUNT_LO(rx_info[1]));
> >
> > - if (dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> > - dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
> > -
> > - ret = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> > - HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> > - (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> > + if (*dev_cnt > HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT)
> > + *dev_cnt = HDCP_2_2_MAX_DEVICE_COUNT;
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -511,6 +506,7 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > u8 *byte = buf;
> > ssize_t ret, bytes_to_recv, len;
> > const struct hdcp2_dp_msg_data *hdcp2_msg_data;
> > + u32 dev_cnt;
> >
> > hdcp2_msg_data = get_hdcp2_dp_msg_data(msg_id);
> > if (!hdcp2_msg_data)
> > @@ -523,17 +519,22 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg(struct
> > intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> >
> > hdcp->cp_irq_count_cached = atomic_read(&hdcp->cp_irq_count);
> >
> > + /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
> > + byte++;
> > +
> > if (msg_id == HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST) {
> > - ret = get_receiver_id_list_size(dig_port);
> > + ret = get_receiver_id_list_rx_info(dig_port, &dev_cnt,
> > byte);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - size = ret;
> > + byte += ret;
> > + size = sizeof(struct hdcp2_rep_send_receiverid_list) -
> > + HDCP_2_2_RXINFO_LEN -
> > HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_IDS_MAX_LEN +
> > + (dev_cnt * HDCP_2_2_RECEIVER_ID_LEN);
> > }
> > - bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
> >
> > /* DP adaptation msgs has no msg_id */
> Please remove this comment.
> With that
> Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > - byte++;
> > + bytes_to_recv = size - 1;
> >
> > while (bytes_to_recv) {
> > len = bytes_to_recv > DP_AUX_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES ?
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > index edffd1dcca3e..3b42392394ba 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> > @@ -1388,7 +1388,7 @@ enum drm_dp_phy { #define
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_INIT_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RN_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_LC_SEND_LPRIME_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_LPRIME_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_SKE_SEND_EKS_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_EDKEY_KS_OFFSET
> > -#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_RXINFO_OFFSET
> > +#define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_RECVID_LIST_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_V_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_SEND_ACK_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_V_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_MANAGE_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_SEQ_NUM_M_OFFSET
> > #define DP_HDCP_2_2_REP_STREAM_READY_OFFSET
> > DP_HDCP_2_2_REG_MPRIME_OFFSET
> > --
> > 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2021-01-27 11:14 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 17:53 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gupta, Anshuman @ 2021-01-27 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, Vudum, Lakshminarayana
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3717 bytes --]
Hi Lakshmi ,
Below CI failure is a Core failures, which has failed BAT results.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html#dmesg-warnings426
Could you please re-report results.
Thanks ,
Anshuman Gupta.
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Patchwork
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 1:16 PM
To: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
Patch Details
Series:
series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State:
failure
Details:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
Summary
FAILURE
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19513 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_19513, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
Possible new issues
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19513:
IGT changes
Possible regressions
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
* fi-bxt-dsi: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html> -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html>
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513 that come from known issues:
IGT changes
Issues hit
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic:
* fi-tgl-y: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html> -> DMESG-WARN<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html> (i915#402<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402>) +1 similar issue
* igt@runner@aborted:
* fi-bxt-dsi: NOTRUN -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html> (i915#2426<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426>)
Possible fixes
* igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
* fi-tgl-y: DMESG-WARN<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html> (i915#402<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402>) -> PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html> +1 similar issue
Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
Missing (5): fi-jsl-1 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2
Build changes
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf90167ec8d8 drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
0f5367aacba6 drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
c03a6673e642 drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
69e116124dea drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 19092 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-27 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
@ 2021-01-27 17:05 ` Patchwork
2021-01-27 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-27 21:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-27 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juston Li; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3380 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19513 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_19513, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19513:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bxt-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2426])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][7] +1 similar issue
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-jsl-1 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf90167ec8d8 drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
0f5367aacba6 drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
c03a6673e642 drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
69e116124dea drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4162 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-27 17:05 ` Patchwork
@ 2021-01-27 17:34 ` Patchwork
2021-01-27 21:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-27 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juston Li; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2982 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#402]) +1 similar issue
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([i915#2895])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bxt-dsi: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2426])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
- fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#402]) -> [PASS][7] +1 similar issue
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html
[i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
[i915#2895]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2895
[i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402
Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
------------------------------
Missing (5): fi-jsl-1 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf90167ec8d8 drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
0f5367aacba6 drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
c03a6673e642 drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
69e116124dea drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3752 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 11:14 ` Gupta, Anshuman
@ 2021-01-27 17:53 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vudum, Lakshminarayana @ 2021-01-27 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gupta, Anshuman, intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4220 bytes --]
Re-reported.
From: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:14 AM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana <lakshminarayana.vudum@intel.com>
Cc: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
Hi Lakshmi ,
Below CI failure is a Core failures, which has failed BAT results.
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html#dmesg-warnings426
Could you please re-report results.
Thanks ,
Anshuman Gupta.
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>> On Behalf Of Patchwork
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 1:16 PM
To: Li, Juston <juston.li@intel.com<mailto:juston.li@intel.com>>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
Patch Details
Series:
series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State:
failure
Details:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
Summary
FAILURE
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_19513 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_19513, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
Possible new issues
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19513:
IGT changes
Possible regressions
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
* fi-bxt-dsi: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html> -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html>
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513 that come from known issues:
IGT changes
Issues hit
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic:
* fi-tgl-y: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html> -> DMESG-WARN<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic.html> (i915#402<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402>) +1 similar issue
* igt@runner@aborted:
* fi-bxt-dsi: NOTRUN -> FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@runner@aborted.html> (i915#2426<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426>)
Possible fixes
* igt@gem_exec_create@basic:
* fi-tgl-y: DMESG-WARN<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html> (i915#402<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402>) -> PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_exec_create@basic.html> +1 similar issue
Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
Missing (5): fi-jsl-1 fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2
Build changes
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
cf90167ec8d8 drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST
0f5367aacba6 drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info
c03a6673e642 drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg()
69e116124dea drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 20151 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-27 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2021-01-27 21:08 ` Patchwork
7 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-01-27 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juston Li; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 25438 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86325/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_9686_full -> Patchwork_19513_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_19513_full:
### IGT changes ###
#### Suppressed ####
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* {igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts}:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_19513_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2842]) +2 similar issues
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html
- shard-tglb: [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2842])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@vcs1:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2389])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@vcs1.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0:
- shard-skl: [PASS][12] -> [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#2803])
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0.html
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#2190])
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_render_copy@y-tiled-to-vebox-x-tiled:
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271]) +12 similar issues
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk3/igt@gem_render_copy@y-tiled-to-vebox-x-tiled.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@evict:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][17] ([i915#198] / [i915#2782])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@i915_selftest@live@evict.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][18] ([i915#1886] / [i915#2291])
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html
* igt@kms_async_flips@test-time-stamp:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#2597])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_async_flips@test-time-stamp.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_async_flips@test-time-stamp.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-cmp-planar-formats:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-cmp-planar-formats.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-after-suspend:
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827])
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk9/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-after-suspend.html
* igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-max:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][23] ([fdo#109271]) +45 similar issues
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-max.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-green-to-red:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +2 similar issues
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-green-to-red.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-random:
- shard-snb: [PASS][25] -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109271])
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-snb4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-random.html
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-snb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-random.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x42-random:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][27] ([i915#54])
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-128x42-random.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random:
- shard-skl: [PASS][28] -> [FAIL][29] ([i915#54]) +6 similar issues
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random.html
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-64x64-random.html
* igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][30] ([i915#1982])
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-64x64-top-edge.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-bo.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank@b-hdmi-a2:
- shard-glk: [PASS][32] -> [FAIL][33] ([i915#2122])
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank@b-hdmi-a2.html
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank@b-hdmi-a2.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-edp1:
- shard-skl: [PASS][34] -> [FAIL][35] ([i915#79])
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@c-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-64bpp-ytile:
- shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2642])
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk9/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-64bpp-ytile.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109280])
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][38] ([i915#265])
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-skl: [PASS][39] -> [FAIL][40] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-basic:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][41] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-basic.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
* igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][43] -> [SKIP][44] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658])
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][45] -> [SKIP][46] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_blt.html
* igt@perf@polling-parameterized:
- shard-skl: [PASS][47] -> [FAIL][48] ([i915#1542])
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl9/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@feature_discovery@psr2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][49] ([i915#658]) -> [PASS][50]
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb6/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0:
- shard-apl: [FAIL][51] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][52]
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-apl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0.html
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-apl8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
- shard-kbl: [FAIL][53] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][54] +1 similar issue
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html
* igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0:
- shard-hsw: [FAIL][55] ([i915#2389]) -> [PASS][56]
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-hsw1/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-many-active@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][57] -> [PASS][58]
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0.html
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk9/igt@gem_exec_schedule@u-fairslice@rcs0.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
- shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][59] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) -> [PASS][60]
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk9/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk3/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
- shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][61] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) -> [PASS][62]
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl8/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][63] ([i915#54]) -> [PASS][64] +9 similar issues
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][65] ([i915#2346]) -> [PASS][66]
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html
* igt@kms_flip@blocking-absolute-wf_vblank@a-edp1:
- shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][67] ([i915#1982]) -> [PASS][68]
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@blocking-absolute-wf_vblank@a-edp1.html
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl6/igt@kms_flip@blocking-absolute-wf_vblank@a-edp1.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][70] +2 similar issues
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html
* igt@perf@short-reads:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][71] ([i915#51]) -> [PASS][72]
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl4/igt@perf@short-reads.html
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl4/igt@perf@short-reads.html
* {igt@sysfs_clients@pidname}:
- shard-glk: [FAIL][73] ([i915#3008]) -> [PASS][74]
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk4/igt@sysfs_clients@pidname.html
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk4/igt@sysfs_clients@pidname.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
- shard-hsw: [SKIP][75] ([fdo#109271]) -> [SKIP][76] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3012])
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-hsw1/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html
* igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence:
- shard-iclb: [WARN][77] ([i915#1804] / [i915#2684]) -> [WARN][78] ([i915#2684])
[77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence.html
[78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence.html
* igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-y-tiled-small-legacy:
- shard-hsw: [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109271]) -> [SKIP][80] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#109289])
[79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-y-tiled-small-legacy.html
[80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_addfb_basic@addfb25-y-tiled-small-legacy.html
* igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109349]) -> [DMESG-WARN][82] ([i915#1226])
[81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html
[82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_dp_dsc@basic-dsc-enable-edp.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-d-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-hsw: [SKIP][83] ([fdo#109271]) -> [SKIP][84] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +133 similar issues
[83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-d-constant-alpha-min.html
[84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-d-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][85] ([i915#658]) -> [SKIP][86] ([i915#2920]) +1 similar issue
[85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
[86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][87] ([i915#2920]) -> [SKIP][88] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue
[87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
[88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- shard-kbl: ([FAIL][89], [FAIL][90], [FAIL][91]) ([i915#2295] / [i915#2505]) -> ([FAIL][92], [FAIL][93], [FAIL][94]) ([i915#2295])
[89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-kbl6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-kbl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
- shard-iclb: ([FAIL][95], [FAIL][96], [FAIL][97], [FAIL][98]) ([i915#2295] / [i915#2426] / [i915#2724]) -> ([FAIL][99], [FAIL][100], [FAIL][101]) ([i915#2295] / [i915#2724])
[95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-iclb4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-iclb5/igt@runner@aborted.html
- shard-glk: ([FAIL][102], [FAIL][103], [FAIL][104], [FAIL][105], [FAIL][106]) ([i915#2295] / [i915#2426] / [k.org#202321]) -> ([FAIL][107], [FAIL][108], [FAIL][109]) ([i915#2295] / [k.org#202321])
[102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-glk9/igt@runner@aborted.html
[107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-glk8/igt@runner@aborted.html
- shard-skl: ([FAIL][110], [FAIL][111], [FAIL][112], [FAIL][113]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#2295]) -> ([FAIL][114], [FAIL][115], [FAIL][116], [FAIL][117], [FAIL][118]) ([i915#2029] / [i915#2295] / [i915#2426])
[110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl9/igt@runner@aborted.html
[112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl8/igt@runner@aborted.html
[113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9686/shard-skl6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl9/igt@runner@aborted.html
[117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/shard-skl8/igt@runner@aborted.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109280]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
[fdo#109284]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109284
[fdo#109289]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109289
[fdo#109349]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109349
[fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
[fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
[fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
[fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
[i915#1226]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1226
[i915#1436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1436
[i915#1542]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1542
[i915#1804]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1804
[i915#1886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1886
[i915#198]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/198
[i915#1982]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1982
[i915#2029]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2029
[i915#2122]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2122
[i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
[i915#2291]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2291
[i915#2295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2295
[i915#2346]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2346
[i915#2389]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2389
[i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
[i915#2505]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2505
[i915#2597]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2597
[i915#2642]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2642
[i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
[i915#2684]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2684
[i915#2724]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2724
[i915#2782]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2782
[i915#2803]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2803
[i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842
[i915#2920]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2920
[i915#3008]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3008
[i915#3012]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3012
[i915#51]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/51
[i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533
[i915#54]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/54
[i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658
[i915#716]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/716
[i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79
[k.org#202321]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202321
Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------
No changes in participating hosts
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_9686 -> Patchwork_19513
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_9686: 8de0436dc0e777bbd5490d56134a838da4c19121 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5973: 7ae3d0d68e6bf4c5e404c87b570773d1b3173d47 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_19513: cf90167ec8d878cf7739b728e49fd65c5203ac32 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_19513/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 30928 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-27 21:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-27 6:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 over MST Juston Li
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/hdcp: update cp_irq_count_cached in intel_dp_hdcp2_read_msg() Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:17 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/hdcp: read RxInfo once when reading Send_Pairing_Info Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:24 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 8:52 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 6:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/hdcp: disable the QSES check for HDCP2.2 over MST Juston Li
2021-01-27 7:28 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915/hdcp: Disable the QSES check for HDCP 1.4 " Patchwork
2021-01-27 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-27 11:14 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-01-27 17:53 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-01-27 17:05 ` Patchwork
2021-01-27 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-27 21:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.