From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:23:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33f6f81b-ce41-4eba-c62d-93cdb06daa8f@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914200845.GB12195@netboy>
On 09/14/2016 11:08 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:03:18PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>> @@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
>>>> u64 ns;
>>>> u64 frac;
>>>>
>>>> - if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
>>>> - return;
>>>> -
>>>> freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk);
>>>>
>>>> /* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
>>>
>>> This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.
>>
>> Sry, but I did not get your comment here :(
>> I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls?
>
> You added that code in patch #7. Then you moved it in patch #8. You
> could have made the code correct in patch #7 to begin with.
>
Do you mean
- if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
- return;
??
if yes then those changes are correct as from patch#7 point of
view, as from patch#8 because they are separate standalone changes.
In patch patch#7 it reasonable to ball out earlier, while in patch#8
it required to move forward a bit as I need to know maxsec.
Sry, that I'm bothering you with stupid questions.
--
regards,
-grygorii
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:23:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33f6f81b-ce41-4eba-c62d-93cdb06daa8f@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914200845.GB12195@netboy>
On 09/14/2016 11:08 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:03:18PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>> @@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts)
>>>> u64 ns;
>>>> u64 frac;
>>>>
>>>> - if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
>>>> - return;
>>>> -
>>>> freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk);
>>>>
>>>> /* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
>>>
>>> This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.
>>
>> Sry, but I did not get your comment here :(
>> I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls?
>
> You added that code in patch #7. Then you moved it in patch #8. You
> could have made the code correct in patch #7 to begin with.
>
Do you mean
- if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift)
- return;
??
if yes then those changes are correct as from patch#7 point of
view, as from patch#8 because they are separate standalone changes.
In patch patch#7 it reasonable to ball out earlier, while in patch#8
it required to move forward a bit as I need to know maxsec.
Sry, that I'm bothering you with stupid questions.
--
regards,
-grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 13:02 [PATCH 0/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: update and fixes Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] net: ethernet: ti: exclude cpts from build when disabled Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: minimize direct access to struct cpts Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: rework initialization/deinitialization Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:52 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:10 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:10 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:32 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:37 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:37 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:52 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-15 8:13 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: move dt props parsing to cpts driver Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:55 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 19:45 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 19:45 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:03 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: add return value to tx and rx timestamp funcitons Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 14:00 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: clean up event list if event pool is empty Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 14:14 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 19:54 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 19:54 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: calc mult and shift from refclk freq Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 14:22 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 19:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 19:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:26 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:47 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:47 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 21:03 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 21:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 21:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-15 11:58 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-15 13:49 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 14:25 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:03 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:03 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:08 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:23 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2016-09-14 20:23 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:43 ` Richard Cochran
2016-09-14 20:48 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 20:48 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: switch to readl/writel_relaxed() Grygorii Strashko
2016-09-14 13:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33f6f81b-ce41-4eba-c62d-93cdb06daa8f@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=w-kwok2@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.