* [Lustre-devel] New test framework
@ 2012-11-10 3:12 Nathan Rutman
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nathan Rutman @ 2012-11-10 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lustre-devel
For awhile now I've believed that the current built-in Lustre tests have a number of problems and limitations that are limiting their usefulness in finding Lustre bugs or providing a good proxy for Lustre quality. We started this initially with a discussion on TWG, further refined some ideas for our LAD presentation, and have now finally articulated them in a semi-coherent manner here:
http://goo.gl/mCtwU
Chris Gearing at Intel is also heavily interested in this, and has started turning some of these thoughts into an actual spec, but before I integrate those I'd like to get a little feedback from the community on the high-level concepts. I'd also like to hear back from others that are interested in the topic (and hopefully willing to work on it) so we can put together a special-interest list for discussion.
I've given everyone comment rights and Chris and Roman edit rights for this doc - if anyone else wants to be an editor, let me know.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20121109/aa4018da/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-11-10 3:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-10 3:12 [Lustre-devel] New test framework Nathan Rutman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.