All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: regressions@lists.linux.dev, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: wait for EMP reset after firmware flash #forregzbot
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:32:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34bc7a39-b7e6-55a8-38d9-4a49c34d1797@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc534155-e5bc-b9d2-24b4-e7559a7c5fb5@molgen.mpg.de>

TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.

#regzbot fixed-by: b537752e6cbf0e

On 12.04.22 15:28, Paul Menzel wrote:
> [Cc: +Jakob, +regressions@lists.linux.dev]
> 
> 
> Dear Petr,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch for the regression.
> 
> #regzbot ^introduced 399e27dbbd9e94
> 
> 
> Am 12.04.22 um 12:27 schrieb Petr Oros:
> 
> Please mention the time in the commit message summary:
> 
> ice: Wait 5 s for EMP reset after firmware flash
> 
>> We need to wait for EMP reset after firmware flash.
>> Code was extracted from OOT driver and without this wait fw_activate let
> 
> Which OOT driver exactly?
> 
>> card in inconsistent state recoverable only by second flash/activate
> 
> Please reflow for 75 characters per line, and add a dot/period to the
> end of sentences.
> 
>> Reproducer:
>> [root@host ~]# devlink dev flash pci/0000:ca:00.0 file
>> E810_XXVDA4_FH_O_SEC_FW_1p6p1p9_NVM_3p10_PLDMoMCTP_0.11_8000AD7B.bin
>> Preparing to flash
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing done
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.undi] Erasing
>> [fw.undi] Erasing done
>> [fw.undi] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.undi] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing done
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing done 100%
>> Activate new firmware by devlink reload
>> [root@host ~]# devlink dev reload pci/0000:ca:00.0 action fw_activate
>> reload_actions_performed:
>>      fw_activate
>> [root@host ~]# ip link show ens7f0
>> 71: ens7f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>> state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>>      link/ether b4:96:91:dc:72:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>      altname enp202s0f0
>>
>> dmesg after flash:
>> [   55.120788] ice: Copyright (c) 2018, Intel Corporation.
>> [   55.274734] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Get PHY capabilities failed status =
>> -5, continuing anyway
>> [   55.569797] ice 0000:ca:00.0: The DDP package was successfully
>> loaded: ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.28.0
>> [   55.603629] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Get PHY capability failed.
>> [   55.608951] ice 0000:ca:00.0: ice_init_nvm_phy_type failed: -5
>> [   55.647348] ice 0000:ca:00.0: PTP init successful
>> [   55.675536] ice 0000:ca:00.0: DCB is enabled in the hardware, max
>> number of TCs supported on this port are 8
>> [   55.685365] ice 0000:ca:00.0: FW LLDP is disabled, DCBx/LLDP in SW
>> mode.
>> [   55.692179] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Commit DCB Configuration to the hardware
>> [   55.701382] ice 0000:ca:00.0: 126.024 Gb/s available PCIe
>> bandwidth, limited by 16.0 GT/s PCIe x8 link at 0000:c9:02.0 (capable
>> of 252.048 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link)
> 
> So, what is the error? `Get PHY capabilities failed status = -5`?
> 
> What firmware version did the network card have before and after the
> update?
> 
>> Reboot don't help, only second flash/activate with OOT or patched
>> driver put card back in consistent state
> 
> s/don't/doesn’t/
> 
>> After patch:
>> [root@host ~]# devlink dev flash pci/0000:ca:00.0 file
>> E810_XXVDA4_FH_O_SEC_FW_1p6p1p9_NVM_3p10_PLDMoMCTP_0.11_8000AD7B.bin
>> Preparing to flash
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing done
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.undi] Erasing
>> [fw.undi] Erasing done
>> [fw.undi] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.undi] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing done
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing done 100%
>> Activate new firmware by devlink reload
>> [root@host ~]# devlink dev reload pci/0000:ca:00.0 action fw_activate
>> reload_actions_performed:
>>      fw_activate
>> [root@host ~]# ip link show ens7f0
>> 19: ens7f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
>> UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>>      link/ether b4:96:91:dc:72:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>>      altname enp202s0f0
> 
> Did you try anything less than five seconds? i40e uses one second, cf.
> commit 9b13bd53134c (i40e: Increase delay to 1 s after global EMP reset).
> 
>> Fixes: 399e27dbbd9e94 ("ice: support immediate firmware activation via
>> devlink reload")
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> index d768925785ca79..90ea2203cdc763 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> @@ -6931,12 +6931,15 @@ static void ice_rebuild(struct ice_pf *pf,
>> enum ice_reset_req reset_type)
>>         dev_dbg(dev, "rebuilding PF after reset_type=%d\n", reset_type);
>>   +#define ICE_EMP_RESET_SLEEP 5000
> 
> Please append the unit to the macro name.
> 
>>       if (reset_type == ICE_RESET_EMPR) {
>>           /* If an EMP reset has occurred, any previously pending flash
>>            * update will have completed. We no longer know whether or
>>            * not the NVM update EMP reset is restricted.
>>            */
>>           pf->fw_emp_reset_disabled = false;
>> +
>> +        msleep(ICE_EMP_RESET_SLEEP);
>>       }
>>         err = ice_init_all_ctrlq(hw);
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: wait for EMP reset after firmware flash #forregzbot
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:32:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34bc7a39-b7e6-55a8-38d9-4a49c34d1797@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc534155-e5bc-b9d2-24b4-e7559a7c5fb5@molgen.mpg.de>

TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for
regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually
contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter.

#regzbot fixed-by: b537752e6cbf0e

On 12.04.22 15:28, Paul Menzel wrote:
> [Cc: +Jakob, +regressions at lists.linux.dev]
> 
> 
> Dear Petr,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch for the regression.
> 
> #regzbot ^introduced 399e27dbbd9e94
> 
> 
> Am 12.04.22 um 12:27 schrieb Petr Oros:
> 
> Please mention the time in the commit message summary:
> 
> ice: Wait 5 s for EMP reset after firmware flash
> 
>> We need to wait for EMP reset after firmware flash.
>> Code was extracted from OOT driver and without this wait fw_activate let
> 
> Which OOT driver exactly?
> 
>> card in inconsistent state recoverable only by second flash/activate
> 
> Please reflow for 75 characters per line, and add a dot/period to the
> end of sentences.
> 
>> Reproducer:
>> [root at host ~]# devlink dev flash pci/0000:ca:00.0 file
>> E810_XXVDA4_FH_O_SEC_FW_1p6p1p9_NVM_3p10_PLDMoMCTP_0.11_8000AD7B.bin
>> Preparing to flash
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing done
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.undi] Erasing
>> [fw.undi] Erasing done
>> [fw.undi] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.undi] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing done
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing done 100%
>> Activate new firmware by devlink reload
>> [root at host ~]# devlink dev reload pci/0000:ca:00.0 action fw_activate
>> reload_actions_performed:
>> ???? fw_activate
>> [root at host ~]# ip link show ens7f0
>> 71: ens7f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq
>> state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>> ???? link/ether b4:96:91:dc:72:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> ???? altname enp202s0f0
>>
>> dmesg after flash:
>> [?? 55.120788] ice: Copyright (c) 2018, Intel Corporation.
>> [?? 55.274734] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Get PHY capabilities failed status =
>> -5, continuing anyway
>> [?? 55.569797] ice 0000:ca:00.0: The DDP package was successfully
>> loaded: ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.28.0
>> [?? 55.603629] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Get PHY capability failed.
>> [?? 55.608951] ice 0000:ca:00.0: ice_init_nvm_phy_type failed: -5
>> [?? 55.647348] ice 0000:ca:00.0: PTP init successful
>> [?? 55.675536] ice 0000:ca:00.0: DCB is enabled in the hardware, max
>> number of TCs supported on this port are 8
>> [?? 55.685365] ice 0000:ca:00.0: FW LLDP is disabled, DCBx/LLDP in SW
>> mode.
>> [?? 55.692179] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Commit DCB Configuration to the hardware
>> [?? 55.701382] ice 0000:ca:00.0: 126.024 Gb/s available PCIe
>> bandwidth, limited by 16.0 GT/s PCIe x8 link at 0000:c9:02.0 (capable
>> of 252.048 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link)
> 
> So, what is the error? `Get PHY capabilities failed status = -5`?
> 
> What firmware version did the network card have before and after the
> update?
> 
>> Reboot don't help, only second flash/activate with OOT or patched
>> driver put card back in consistent state
> 
> s/don't/doesn?t/
> 
>> After patch:
>> [root at host ~]# devlink dev flash pci/0000:ca:00.0 file
>> E810_XXVDA4_FH_O_SEC_FW_1p6p1p9_NVM_3p10_PLDMoMCTP_0.11_8000AD7B.bin
>> Preparing to flash
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing
>> [fw.mgmt] Erasing done
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.mgmt] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.undi] Erasing
>> [fw.undi] Erasing done
>> [fw.undi] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.undi] Flashing done 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing
>> [fw.netlist] Erasing done
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing 100%
>> [fw.netlist] Flashing done 100%
>> Activate new firmware by devlink reload
>> [root at host ~]# devlink dev reload pci/0000:ca:00.0 action fw_activate
>> reload_actions_performed:
>> ???? fw_activate
>> [root at host ~]# ip link show ens7f0
>> 19: ens7f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
>> UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>> ???? link/ether b4:96:91:dc:72:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>> ???? altname enp202s0f0
> 
> Did you try anything less than five seconds? i40e uses one second, cf.
> commit 9b13bd53134c (i40e: Increase delay to 1 s after global EMP reset).
> 
>> Fixes: 399e27dbbd9e94 ("ice: support immediate firmware activation via
>> devlink reload")
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 3 +++
>> ? 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> index d768925785ca79..90ea2203cdc763 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
>> @@ -6931,12 +6931,15 @@ static void ice_rebuild(struct ice_pf *pf,
>> enum ice_reset_req reset_type)
>> ? ????? dev_dbg(dev, "rebuilding PF after reset_type=%d\n", reset_type);
>> ? +#define ICE_EMP_RESET_SLEEP 5000
> 
> Please append the unit to the macro name.
> 
>> ????? if (reset_type == ICE_RESET_EMPR) {
>> ????????? /* If an EMP reset has occurred, any previously pending flash
>> ?????????? * update will have completed. We no longer know whether or
>> ?????????? * not the NVM update EMP reset is restricted.
>> ?????????? */
>> ????????? pf->fw_emp_reset_disabled = false;
>> +
>> +??????? msleep(ICE_EMP_RESET_SLEEP);
>> ????? }
>> ? ????? err = ice_init_all_ctrlq(hw);
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-29 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12 10:27 [PATCH] ice: wait for EMP reset after firmware flash Petr Oros
2022-04-12 10:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Oros
2022-04-12 13:28 ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-12 13:28   ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-29 11:32   ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2022-04-29 11:32     ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: wait for EMP reset after firmware flash #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-04-12 16:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: wait for EMP reset after firmware flash Alexander Lobakin
2022-04-12 16:08   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-04-12 17:04   ` Jacob Keller
2022-04-12 18:29   ` Jesse Brandeburg
2022-04-12 18:29     ` Jesse Brandeburg
2022-04-12 16:58 ` Jacob Keller
2022-04-12 16:58   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
2022-04-13 15:38   ` Petr Oros
2022-04-13 15:38     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Oros
2022-04-13 15:37 ` [PATCH v2] ice: wait 5 s " Petr Oros
2022-04-13 15:37   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Petr Oros
2022-04-14 12:16   ` G, GurucharanX
2022-04-14 12:16     ` G, GurucharanX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34bc7a39-b7e6-55a8-38d9-4a49c34d1797@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.