From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: enable ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER for aarch64 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:03:08 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <35233df0-3406-e66f-d9d2-bf7ed7814386@huawei.com> (raw) The ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER will enable Relaxed Ordering (RO) which allows transactions that do not have any order of completion requirements to complete more efficiently compare to the Stricted Ordering (SO) for ixbge nic card. The system will see high write-to-memory performance when RO is enabled on the data transactions just like the SPARC did. The aarch64 pcie controller could both support Relaxed Ordering (RO) and Stricted Ordering (SO), so enable ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER for ixgbe nic card to get much more better performance, and didn't see any adverse effects. Nic Card(Ixgbe) Disable RO | Enable RO Performance(Per thread) 8.4Gb/s | 9.4Gb/s Tested by Iperf on Hip06/Hip07 Soc Board. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 8c7c244..36249a3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ config ARM64 select SPARSE_IRQ select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK + select ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER help ARM 64-bit (AArch64) Linux support. -- 1.9.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dingtianhong@huawei.com (Ding Tianhong) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] arm64: enable ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER for aarch64 Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:03:08 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <35233df0-3406-e66f-d9d2-bf7ed7814386@huawei.com> (raw) The ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER will enable Relaxed Ordering (RO) which allows transactions that do not have any order of completion requirements to complete more efficiently compare to the Stricted Ordering (SO) for ixbge nic card. The system will see high write-to-memory performance when RO is enabled on the data transactions just like the SPARC did. The aarch64 pcie controller could both support Relaxed Ordering (RO) and Stricted Ordering (SO), so enable ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER for ixgbe nic card to get much more better performance, and didn't see any adverse effects. Nic Card(Ixgbe) Disable RO | Enable RO Performance(Per thread) 8.4Gb/s | 9.4Gb/s Tested by Iperf on Hip06/Hip07 Soc Board. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 8c7c244..36249a3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ config ARM64 select SPARSE_IRQ select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK + select ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER help ARM 64-bit (AArch64) Linux support. -- 1.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 12:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-03-13 12:03 Ding Tianhong [this message] 2017-03-13 12:03 ` [PATCH] arm64: enable ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER for aarch64 Ding Tianhong 2017-03-13 13:31 ` Robin Murphy 2017-03-13 13:31 ` Robin Murphy 2017-03-14 14:06 ` Ding Tianhong 2017-03-14 14:06 ` Ding Tianhong 2017-03-20 11:52 ` Will Deacon 2017-03-20 11:52 ` Will Deacon 2017-03-20 14:00 ` Robin Murphy 2017-03-20 14:00 ` Robin Murphy 2017-03-31 12:25 ` Ding Tianhong 2017-03-31 12:25 ` Ding Tianhong 2017-04-07 15:57 ` Gabriele Paoloni 2017-04-07 15:57 ` Gabriele Paoloni 2017-04-13 5:35 ` Ding Tianhong 2017-04-13 5:35 ` Ding Tianhong
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=35233df0-3406-e66f-d9d2-bf7ed7814386@huawei.com \ --to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \ --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.