All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:04:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <353b5206205cc71d25998c9601a052dade081b94.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1651071843.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 11:56 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Refactor UDP/IPv6 and especially udpv6_sendmsg() paths. The end result looks
> cleaner than it was before and the series also removes a bunch of instructions
> and other overhead from the hot path positively affecting performance.
> 
> It was a part of a larger series, there were some perf numbers for it, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1648981570.git.asml.silence@gmail.com/
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (11):
>   ipv6: optimise ipcm6 cookie init
>   udp/ipv6: refactor udpv6_sendmsg udplite checks
>   udp/ipv6: move pending section of udpv6_sendmsg
>   udp/ipv6: prioritise the ip6 path over ip4 checks
>   udp/ipv6: optimise udpv6_sendmsg() daddr checks
>   udp/ipv6: optimise out daddr reassignment
>   udp/ipv6: clean up udpv6_sendmsg's saddr init
>   ipv6: partially inline fl6_update_dst()
>   ipv6: refactor opts push in __ip6_make_skb()
>   ipv6: improve opt-less __ip6_make_skb()
>   ipv6: clean up ip6_setup_cork
> 
>  include/net/ipv6.h    |  24 +++----
>  net/ipv6/datagram.c   |   4 +-
>  net/ipv6/exthdrs.c    |  15 ++--
>  net/ipv6/ip6_output.c |  53 +++++++-------
>  net/ipv6/raw.c        |   8 +--
>  net/ipv6/udp.c        | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c   |   8 +--
>  7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)

Just a general comment here: IMHO the above diffstat is quite
significant and some patches looks completely non trivial to me.

I think we need a quite significant performance gain to justify the
above, could you please share your performace data, comprising the
testing scenario?

Thanks!

Paolo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 10:56 [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] ipv6: optimise ipcm6 cookie init Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:04   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-04-28 15:27     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] udp/ipv6: refactor udpv6_sendmsg udplite checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:09   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-04-28 15:11     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] udp/ipv6: move pending section of udpv6_sendmsg Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] udp/ipv6: prioritise the ip6 path over ip4 checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] udp/ipv6: optimise udpv6_sendmsg() daddr checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] udp/ipv6: optimise out daddr reassignment Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] udp/ipv6: clean up udpv6_sendmsg's saddr init Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] ipv6: partially inline fl6_update_dst() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] ipv6: refactor opts push in __ip6_make_skb() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] ipv6: improve opt-less __ip6_make_skb() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] ipv6: clean up ip6_setup_cork Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:04 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-04-28 15:03   ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=353b5206205cc71d25998c9601a052dade081b94.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.