Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver

From: "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>
To: "fercerpav@gmail.com" <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Cc: "corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com" <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>,
	"billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com" <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>,
	"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"andrew@aj.id.au" <andrew@aj.id.au>,
	"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
	"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Weiss, Zev" <zweiss@equinix.com>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com" 
	<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:08:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35aff70623a156ebe39106db26a443659de2ef79.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBhHS7v+98NK56is@home.paul.comp>

On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 14:45 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We are seeing wrong DTS temperatures on at least "Intel(R) Xeon(R)
> Bronze 3204 CPU @ 1.90GHz" and most probably other Skylake Xeon CPUs
> are also affected, see inline.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 04:36:36PM +0100, Iwona Winiarska wrote:
> > Add peci-cputemp driver for Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) thermal
> > readings of the processor package and processor cores that are
> > accessible via the PECI interface.
> ...
> > +static const struct cpu_info cpu_hsx = {
> > +       .reg            = &resolved_cores_reg_hsx,
> > +       .min_peci_revision = 0x33,
> > +       .thermal_margin_to_millidegree =
> > &dts_eight_dot_eight_to_millidegree,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct cpu_info cpu_icx = {
> > +       .reg            = &resolved_cores_reg_icx,
> > +       .min_peci_revision = 0x40,
> > +       .thermal_margin_to_millidegree = &dts_ten_dot_six_to_millidegree,
> > +};
> ...
> > +       {
> > +               .name = "peci_cpu.cputemp.skx",
> > +               .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&cpu_hsx,
> > +       },
> 
> With this configuration we get this data:
> 
> /sys/bus/peci/devices/0-30/peci_cpu.cputemp.skx.48/hwmon/hwmon15# grep .
> temp[123]_{label,input}
> temp1_label:Die
> temp2_label:DTS
> temp3_label:Tcontrol
> temp1_input:30938
> temp2_input:67735
> temp3_input:80000
> 
> On the host system "sensors" report
> 
> Package id 0:  +31.C (high = +80.C, crit = +90.C)
> 
> So I conclude Die temperature as retrieved over PECI is correct while
> DTS is mis-calculated. The old downstream code in OpenBMC was using
> ten_dot_six_to_millidegree() function for conversion, and that was
> providing expected results. And indeed if we reverse the calculation
> here we get 80000 - ((80000-67735) * 256 / 64) = 30940 which matches
> expectations.
> 

Hi!

Thanks for the report.

It was changed between v2 and v3 after a report about negative temperature on
pre-ICX platforms:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6891496eabcc6f9cacec4fea505fb757ea9c11fc.camel@intel.com/

Unfortunately, I'm not able to test this on Cascade Lake X (or any other pre-ICX
platform).
I just sent a patch that changes SKX to use S10.6 format:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230321090410.866766-1-iwona.winiarska@intel.com/

Thanks
-Iwona