All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:14:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3619797.0aKKBP4JP5@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130525012434.GA24005@verge.net.au>

Hi Simon,

On Saturday 25 May 2013 10:24:34 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Here's the second version of the gpio-rcar driver DT bindings. I've tested
> > the patches on the Marzen board (r8a7779).
> > 
> > Once again I'd appreciate feedback on the DT bindings. I'm particularly
> > wondering whether getting the number of lines through the gpio-ranges
> > property instead of using a dedicated #gpio-lines property as in v1 is a
> > good idea.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 
> > - Initialize the gpiochip dev field at probe time.
> > - Add the gpio-ranges property.
> > - Remove the #gpio-lines property. The number of lines is now passed
> > through> 
> >   the gpio-ranges property.
> > 
> > Laurent Pinchart (2):
> >   gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed
> >   gpio-rcar: Add DT support
> >  
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 52 +++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           | 66 +++++++++++++----
> >  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-rcar.h            |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
>
> Hi Magnus,
> 
> could you please review these changes?

I've received Magnus' ack face-to-face last week. I'm not sure whether that's 
a proper procedure, but I'm sure he will confirm that if needed.

Could you please take the patch in your tree for v3.11 ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:14:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3619797.0aKKBP4JP5@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130525012434.GA24005@verge.net.au>

Hi Simon,

On Saturday 25 May 2013 10:24:34 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Here's the second version of the gpio-rcar driver DT bindings. I've tested
> > the patches on the Marzen board (r8a7779).
> > 
> > Once again I'd appreciate feedback on the DT bindings. I'm particularly
> > wondering whether getting the number of lines through the gpio-ranges
> > property instead of using a dedicated #gpio-lines property as in v1 is a
> > good idea.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 
> > - Initialize the gpiochip dev field at probe time.
> > - Add the gpio-ranges property.
> > - Remove the #gpio-lines property. The number of lines is now passed
> > through> 
> >   the gpio-ranges property.
> > 
> > Laurent Pinchart (2):
> >   gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed
> >   gpio-rcar: Add DT support
> >  
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 52 +++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           | 66 +++++++++++++----
> >  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-rcar.h            |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
>
> Hi Magnus,
> 
> could you please review these changes?

I've received Magnus' ack face-to-face last week. I'm not sure whether that's 
a proper procedure, but I'm sure he will confirm that if needed.

Could you please take the patch in your tree for v3.11 ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:14:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3619797.0aKKBP4JP5@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130525012434.GA24005@verge.net.au>

Hi Simon,

On Saturday 25 May 2013 10:24:34 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Here's the second version of the gpio-rcar driver DT bindings. I've tested
> > the patches on the Marzen board (r8a7779).
> > 
> > Once again I'd appreciate feedback on the DT bindings. I'm particularly
> > wondering whether getting the number of lines through the gpio-ranges
> > property instead of using a dedicated #gpio-lines property as in v1 is a
> > good idea.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 
> > - Initialize the gpiochip dev field at probe time.
> > - Add the gpio-ranges property.
> > - Remove the #gpio-lines property. The number of lines is now passed
> > through> 
> >   the gpio-ranges property.
> > 
> > Laurent Pinchart (2):
> >   gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed
> >   gpio-rcar: Add DT support
> >  
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 52 +++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           | 66 +++++++++++++----
> >  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-rcar.h            |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
>
> Hi Magnus,
> 
> could you please review these changes?

I've received Magnus' ack face-to-face last week. I'm not sure whether that's 
a proper procedure, but I'm sure he will confirm that if needed.

Could you please take the patch in your tree for v3.11 ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-21 11:40 [RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 1/2] gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-23  1:39   ` Simon Horman
2013-05-23  1:39     ` Simon Horman
2013-05-23  1:39     ` Simon Horman
2013-05-21 11:40 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 2/2] gpio-rcar: Add DT support Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-21 11:40   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-30 17:38   ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 17:38     ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 17:38     ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-31  1:20     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-31  1:20       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-31  1:20       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-31  7:01       ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-31  7:01         ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-31  7:01         ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-31  7:32         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-31  7:32           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-31  7:32           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-12 11:49   ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:49     ` Grant Likely
2013-06-12 11:49     ` Grant Likely
2013-06-13 17:08     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-13 17:08       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-13 17:08       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-25  1:24 ` [RFC/PATCH v2 0/2] R-Car GPIO DT bindings Simon Horman
2013-05-25  1:24   ` Simon Horman
2013-05-25  1:24   ` Simon Horman
2013-06-11 22:14   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-06-11 22:14     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-11 22:14     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-12  1:51     ` Simon Horman
2013-06-12  1:51       ` Simon Horman
2013-06-12  1:51       ` Simon Horman
2013-06-12 14:09       ` Simon Horman
2013-06-12 14:09         ` Simon Horman
2013-06-12 14:09         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3619797.0aKKBP4JP5@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.