* [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131
@ 2010-03-03 10:38 Sachin Sant
2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sachin Sant @ 2010-03-03 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball
from Feb.
The Version file still contains 20100131.
:/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version
LTP-20100131
:/home/sachin/work #
Should this be 20100228 ?
Thanks
-Sachin
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131
2010-03-03 10:38 [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 Sachin Sant
@ 2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rishikesh K Rajak @ 2010-03-03 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin Sant; +Cc: ltp-list
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball
> from Feb.
Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file
once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog.
Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from :
LTP-20100228 .
Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But
it will be always available with master branch.
Thanks
Rishi
>
> The Version file still contains 20100131.
>
> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131
> :/home/sachin/work #
>
> Should this be 20100228 ?
>
--
Thanks & Regards
Rishi
LTP Maintainer
IBM, LTC, Bangalore
Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131
2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
@ 2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin Sant, ltp-list, yanegomi
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak
<risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball
>> from Feb.
>
> Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file
> once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog.
>
> Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from :
> LTP-20100228 .
>
> Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But
> it will be always available with master branch.
>
> Thanks
> Rishi
>>
>> The Version file still contains 20100131.
>>
>> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131
>> :/home/sachin/work #
>>
>> Should this be 20100228 ?
Uh, ChangeLog wasn't updated for last month's commits like Subrata
normally does...
HTH,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131
2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2010-03-03 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin Sant, ltp-list, yanegomi
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak
> <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>>> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball
>>> from Feb.
>>
>> Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file
>> once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog.
>>
>> Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from :
>> LTP-20100228 .
>>
>> Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But
>> it will be always available with master branch.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rishi
>>>
>>> The Version file still contains 20100131.
>>>
>>> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131
>>> :/home/sachin/work #
>>>
>>> Should this be 20100228 ?
>
> Uh, ChangeLog wasn't updated for last month's commits like Subrata
> normally does...
It was -- I was looking at the wrong branch.
Rishi,
Could you please look at scripts/git2changelog.sh for next month?
Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131
2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper
@ 2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sachin Sant @ 2010-03-03 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Rishikesh K Rajak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>
>> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball
>> from Feb.
>>
>
> Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file
> once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog.
>
> Can you confirm if you are not having Changelog starting from :
> LTP-20100228 .
>
> Mostly it will not be there as you would have extracted next branch. But
> it will be always available with master branch.
>
Ah thanks for the explanation. I took a fresh copy of Feb LTP and the version
did show 20100228.
Thanks
-Sachin
> Thanks
> Rishi
>
>> The Version file still contains 20100131.
>>
>> :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131
>> :/home/sachin/work #
>>
>> Should this be 20100228 ?
>>
>>
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-03 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-03 10:38 [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131 Sachin Sant
2010-03-03 10:50 ` Rishikesh K Rajak
2010-03-03 11:58 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-03-03 13:57 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-03-03 15:20 ` Sachin Sant
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.