[PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hello,

Joel and I decided that going forward we're not going to name compatibles along
the lines of SoC generations, so discourage any further attempts by removing
the remaining instances.

It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?

Cheers,

Andrew

Andrew Jeffery (3):
  dts: ARM: aspeed: Migrate away from aspeed,g[45].* compatibles
  pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles
  dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi                             | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi                             | 2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c                   | 4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c                   | 4 ++++
 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hello,

Joel and I decided that going forward we're not going to name compatibles along
the lines of SoC generations, so discourage any further attempts by removing
the remaining instances.

It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?

Cheers,

Andrew

Andrew Jeffery (3):
  dts: ARM: aspeed: Migrate away from aspeed,g[45].* compatibles
  pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles
  dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi                             | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi                             | 2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c                   | 4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c                   | 4 ++++
 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/3] dts: ARM: aspeed: Migrate away from aspeed,g[45].* compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Use the SoC-specific compatible strings instead.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
index dd4b0b15afcf..7f06dc21dc19 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 				#reset-cells = <1>;
 
 				pinctrl: pinctrl {
-					compatible = "aspeed,g4-pinctrl";
+					compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl";
 				};
 
 				p2a: p2a-control {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
index 5b1ca265c2ce..04c97138e18b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
 				#reset-cells = <1>;
 
 				pinctrl: pinctrl {
-					compatible = "aspeed,g5-pinctrl";
+					compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl";
 					aspeed,external-nodes = <&gfx &lhc>;
 
 				};
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 1/3] dts: ARM: aspeed: Migrate away from aspeed, g[45].* compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Use the SoC-specific compatible strings instead.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
index dd4b0b15afcf..7f06dc21dc19 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g4.dtsi
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
 				#reset-cells = <1>;
 
 				pinctrl: pinctrl {
-					compatible = "aspeed,g4-pinctrl";
+					compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl";
 				};
 
 				p2a: p2a-control {
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
index 5b1ca265c2ce..04c97138e18b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-g5.dtsi
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
 				#reset-cells = <1>;
 
 				pinctrl: pinctrl {
-					compatible = "aspeed,g5-pinctrl";
+					compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl";
 					aspeed,external-nodes = <&gfx &lhc>;
 
 				};
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Otherwise they look odd in the face of not being listed in the bindings
documents.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c | 4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
index 384396cbb22d..0e087fe759d2 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
@@ -2531,6 +2531,10 @@ static int aspeed_g4_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id aspeed_g4_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl", },
+	/*
+	 * The aspeed,g4-pinctrl compatible has been removed the from the
+	 * bindings, but keep the match in case of old devicetrees.
+	 */
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,g4-pinctrl", },
 	{ },
 };
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
index 053101f795a2..49255802735b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
@@ -2676,6 +2676,10 @@ static int aspeed_g5_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id aspeed_g5_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl", },
+	/*
+	 * The aspeed,g5-pinctrl compatible has been removed the from the
+	 * bindings, but keep the match in case of old devicetrees.
+	 */
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,g5-pinctrl", },
 	{ },
 };
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Otherwise they look odd in the face of not being listed in the bindings
documents.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c | 4 ++++
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
index 384396cbb22d..0e087fe759d2 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g4.c
@@ -2531,6 +2531,10 @@ static int aspeed_g4_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id aspeed_g4_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl", },
+	/*
+	 * The aspeed,g4-pinctrl compatible has been removed the from the
+	 * bindings, but keep the match in case of old devicetrees.
+	 */
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,g4-pinctrl", },
 	{ },
 };
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
index 053101f795a2..49255802735b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed-g5.c
@@ -2676,6 +2676,10 @@ static int aspeed_g5_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static const struct of_device_id aspeed_g5_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl", },
+	/*
+	 * The aspeed,g5-pinctrl compatible has been removed the from the
+	 * bindings, but keep the match in case of old devicetrees.
+	 */
 	{ .compatible = "aspeed,g5-pinctrl", },
 	{ },
 };
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
index ce8cf0ec6279..4d92c0bb6687 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
@@ -4,9 +4,7 @@ configuring elements such as clocks, pinmux, and reset.
 Required properties:
 - compatible:	One of:
 		"aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 		"aspeed,ast2500-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g5-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
 - reg:		contains the offset and length of the SCU memory region
 - #clock-cells: should be set to <1> - the system controller is also a
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
index 854bd67ffec6..0e1fa5bc6a30 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
@@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ property:
 
 - compatible : Should be one of the following:
 		"aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 		"aspeed,ast2500-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g5-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
 Example
 ===================
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
index 125599a2dc5e..9368e4b6d4d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -15,16 +15,13 @@ description: |+
 
   - compatible:     Should be one of the following:
                     "aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-                    "aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
   Refer to the the bindings described in
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
-      - aspeed,g4-pinctrl
+    const: aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
 
 patternProperties:
   '^.*$':
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
index 3e6d85318577..939fb755a6db 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ description: |+
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl
-      - aspeed,g5-pinctrl
+    const: aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl
   aspeed,external-nodes:
     minItems: 2
     maxItems: 2
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
index ce8cf0ec6279..4d92c0bb6687 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt
@@ -4,9 +4,7 @@ configuring elements such as clocks, pinmux, and reset.
 Required properties:
 - compatible:	One of:
 		"aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 		"aspeed,ast2500-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g5-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
 - reg:		contains the offset and length of the SCU memory region
 - #clock-cells: should be set to <1> - the system controller is also a
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
index 854bd67ffec6..0e1fa5bc6a30 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt
@@ -26,9 +26,7 @@ property:
 
 - compatible : Should be one of the following:
 		"aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 		"aspeed,ast2500-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-		"aspeed,g5-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
 Example
 ===================
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
index 125599a2dc5e..9368e4b6d4d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -15,16 +15,13 @@ description: |+
 
   - compatible:     Should be one of the following:
                     "aspeed,ast2400-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
-                    "aspeed,g4-scu", "syscon", "simple-mfd"
 
   Refer to the the bindings described in
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
-      - aspeed,g4-pinctrl
+    const: aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl
 
 patternProperties:
   '^.*$':
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
index 3e6d85318577..939fb755a6db 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -22,9 +22,7 @@ description: |+
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    enum:
-      - aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl
-      - aspeed,g5-pinctrl
+    const: aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl
   aspeed,external-nodes:
     minItems: 2
     maxItems: 2
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
>  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
>  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed-scu.txt         | 2 --
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/aspeed-p2a-ctrl.txt   | 2 --
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2400-pinctrl.yaml  | 5 +----
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/aspeed,ast2500-pinctrl.yaml  | 4 +---
>  4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?

If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
pinctrl tree, yes.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

(If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
conflicts in my tree.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?

If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
pinctrl tree, yes.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

(If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
conflicts in my tree.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?

If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
pinctrl tree, yes.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

(If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
conflicts in my tree.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> 
> If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> pinctrl tree, yes.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> conflicts in my tree.)

Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't really mind
where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it if I split it up.

Andrew

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> 
> If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> pinctrl tree, yes.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> conflicts in my tree.)

Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't really mind
where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it if I split it up.

Andrew

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> 
> If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> pinctrl tree, yes.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> conflicts in my tree.)

Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't really mind
where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it if I split it up.

Andrew

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > 
> > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > conflicts in my tree.)
> 
> Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't 
> really mind
> where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it 
> if I split it up.

Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.

Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

Andrew

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > 
> > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > conflicts in my tree.)
> 
> Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't 
> really mind
> where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it 
> if I split it up.

Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.

Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

Andrew

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > 
> > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > 
> > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > conflicts in my tree.)
> 
> Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't 
> really mind
> where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it 
> if I split it up.

Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.

Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

Andrew

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Joel Stanley]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > >
> > > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > > conflicts in my tree.)
> >
> > Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't
> > really mind
> > where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it
> > if I split it up.
>
> Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.
>
> Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
this merge window :)

Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
and you can take the rest through yours?

Cheers,

Joel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Joel Stanley]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > >
> > > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > > conflicts in my tree.)
> >
> > Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't
> > really mind
> > where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it
> > if I split it up.
>
> Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.
>
> Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
this merge window :)

Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
and you can take the rest through yours?

Cheers,

Joel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Joel Stanley]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 05:45, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 10:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019, at 07:23, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's probably best if we push the three patches all through one tree rather
> > > > than fragmenting. Is everyone happy if Joel applies them to the aspeed tree?
> > >
> > > If you are sure it will not collide with parallell work in the
> > > pinctrl tree, yes.
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > (If it does collide I'd prefer to take the pinctrl patches and fix the
> > > conflicts in my tree.)
> >
> > Fair enough, I don't know the answer so I'll poke around. I don't
> > really mind
> > where the series goes in, I just want to avoid landing only part of it
> > if I split it up.
>
> Okay, it currently conflicts with my cleanup-devicetree-warnings series.
>
> Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?

It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
this merge window :)

Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
and you can take the rest through yours?

Cheers,

Joel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:15 AM Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:

> > Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> > the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?
>
> It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
> this merge window :)
>
> Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
> and you can take the rest through yours?

OK let's proceed like that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:15 AM Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:

> > Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> > the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?
>
> It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
> this merge window :)
>
> Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
> and you can take the rest through yours?

OK let's proceed like that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Deprecate g[45]-style compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:15 AM Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> wrote:

> > Joel, do you mind if Linus takes this series through the pinctrl tree, given
> > the fix to the devicetrees is patch 1/3?
>
> It depends if you plan more changes to that part of the device tree
> this merge window :)
>
> Linus, perhaps the safer option is for me to take 1/3 through my tree
> and you can take the rest through yours?

OK let's proceed like that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Otherwise they look odd in the face of not being listed in the bindings
> documents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Otherwise they look odd in the face of not being listed in the bindings
> documents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Document existence of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Otherwise they look odd in the face of not being listed in the bindings
> documents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:

> Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>

Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> 
> Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

With my Ack?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> 
> Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

With my Ack?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> 
> Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.

With my Ack?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> >
> > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
>
> With my Ack?

Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?

Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
discussion.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> >
> > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
>
> With my Ack?

Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?

Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
discussion.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> >
> > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
>
> With my Ack?

Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?

Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
discussion.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> > >
> > > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
> >
> > With my Ack?
> 
> Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?
> 
> Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
> Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
> patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
> discussion.

No need.  I would have Acked it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> > >
> > > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
> >
> > With my Ack?
> 
> Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?
> 
> Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
> Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
> patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
> discussion.

No need.  I would have Acked it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: aspeed: Remove mention of deprecated compatibles

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Aug 2019, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guide readers away from using the aspeed,g[45].* compatible patterns.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> > >
> > > Patch applied to the pinctrl tree.
> >
> > With my Ack?
> 
> Sorry no. :( Was I too trigger-happy?
> 
> Usually I take Rob's ACK as authoritative for anything under
> Documentation/devicetree but if you have concerns about the
> patch from an MFD point of view I will revert it pending further
> discussion.

No need.  I would have Acked it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel