datalogging and quota patches port to 2.4.21-pre6

datalogging and quota patches port to 2.4.21-pre6

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

   Ok, so I ported Chris' patches to 2.4.21-pre6 (should appear on your
   kernel.org mirror soon, have appeared in bk already).

   Patches are at
   ftp://namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/data-logging-and-quota-2.4.21-pre6
   They are intend to replace similar named patches from Chris' ftp directory at
   ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21

   Also if you want to try these patches with 2.4.21-pre5-ac3,
   you only need to apply my 2.4.21-pre6 versions of 05-2.4.21-pre6-data-logging-36.diff.gz
   and 08-2.4.21-pre6-reiserfs-quota-26.diff.gz (but I have not tried this configuration yet).

   Enjoy.

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: datalogging and quota patches port to 2.4.21-pre6

[Manuel Krause]

On 03/20/2003 04:13 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
> 
>    Ok, so I ported Chris' patches to 2.4.21-pre6 (should appear on your
>    kernel.org mirror soon, have appeared in bk already).
> 
>    Patches are at
>    ftp://namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/data-logging-and-quota-2.4.21-pre6
>    They are intend to replace similar named patches from Chris' ftp directory at
>    ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21
> 
>    Also if you want to try these patches with 2.4.21-pre5-ac3,
>    you only need to apply my 2.4.21-pre6 versions of 05-2.4.21-pre6-data-logging-36.diff.gz
>    and 08-2.4.21-pre6-reiserfs-quota-26.diff.gz (but I have not tried this configuration yet).
> 
>    Enjoy.
> 
> Bye,
>     Oleg
> 

Hi Oleg,

GRIN !!!  I really would like to enjoy these, but you seem to be far 
away in future. Still no "official" patch seems to be out -- at least 
for me on here. (Yes, I'll wait and would not use bk.)

Have your previously pending patches been included into 2.4.21-pre6
(they are: 02-trivial1.diff
            03-more-mount-checks.diff
            01-journal-overflow-fix.diff
  from    ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing :
           iget5_locked_for_2.4.21-pre5-datalogging.diff.gz
  and posted to our ML @ "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:46:42 +0300" :
             direct-io-fix-II.diff
) ?

My question only results from beeing unable to get them all applied to 
2.4.21-pre5 with data-logging without rejects and me feeling unsafe to 
adjust them manually.

Thanks,

Manuel


--
If we'll never find peace, freedom and democracy with our souls -- how 
can our world? We only need to begin. Yes, first step first, in peace...

Re: datalogging and quota patches port to 2.4.21-pre6

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:58:45AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:

> GRIN !!!  I really would like to enjoy these, but you seem to be far 
> away in future. Still no "official" patch seems to be out -- at least 
> for me on here. (Yes, I'll wait and would not use bk.)
> Have your previously pending patches been included into 2.4.21-pre6
> (they are: 02-trivial1.diff
>            03-more-mount-checks.diff
>            01-journal-overflow-fix.diff
>  from    ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing :
>           iget5_locked_for_2.4.21-pre5-datalogging.diff.gz
>  and posted to our ML @ "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:46:42 +0300" :
>             direct-io-fix-II.diff
> ) ?

Only patches that are visible at 
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending
were included into 2.4 tree.
iget5_locked patch is in testing right now.
direct-io-fix-II.diff have triggered some old long known minor metadata
updating problems in case of unexpected crash and I am looking how to resolve
that and trying various stuff.

> My question only results from beeing unable to get them all applied to 
> 2.4.21-pre5 with data-logging without rejects and me feeling unsafe to 
> adjust them manually.

Well, if you apply all of those patches from
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending on clean 2.4.20
(or whatever is needed for 2.4.21-pre5 only frpm
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.21-pre5.pending)
and then apply data logging patches as if you have 2.4.21-pre6,
and then iget5_locked stuff, it should work.

Bye, 
    Oleg

Re: datalogging and quota patches port to 2.4.21-pre6

[Manuel Krause]

On 03/22/2003 08:29 AM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:58:45AM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote:
> 
>>GRIN !!!  I really would like to enjoy these, but you seem to be far 
>>away in future. Still no "official" patch seems to be out -- at least 
>>for me on here. (Yes, I'll wait and would not use bk.)
>>Have your previously pending patches been included into 2.4.21-pre6
>>(they are: 02-trivial1.diff
>>           03-more-mount-checks.diff
>>           01-journal-overflow-fix.diff
>> from    ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing :
>>          iget5_locked_for_2.4.21-pre5-datalogging.diff.gz
>> and posted to our ML @ "Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:46:42 +0300" :
>>            direct-io-fix-II.diff
>>) ?
> 
> Only patches that are visible at 
> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending
> were included into 2.4 tree.
> iget5_locked patch is in testing right now.
> direct-io-fix-II.diff have triggered some old long known minor metadata
> updating problems in case of unexpected crash and I am looking how to resolve
> that and trying various stuff.
> 
>>My question only results from beeing unable to get them all applied to 
>>2.4.21-pre5 with data-logging without rejects and me feeling unsafe to 
>>adjust them manually.
> 
> Well, if you apply all of those patches from
> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending on clean 2.4.20
> (or whatever is needed for 2.4.21-pre5 only frpm
> ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.21-pre5.pending)
> and then apply data logging patches as if you have 2.4.21-pre6,
> and then iget5_locked stuff, it should work.


Thank you Oleg for the information and the hint.

When following your directions these patches apply fine and the kernel 
works pretty well, too.

Thanks again,

Manuel