All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured?
@ 2003-06-22  7:12 Harald Dunkel
  2003-06-22  8:19 ` Matthew Dharm
  2003-06-22  9:11 ` Harald Dunkel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Harald Dunkel @ 2003-06-22  7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kernel Mailing List

Hi folks,

This morning I tried to attach an 2.5" HD via USB2.0 to my Linux box.
I got a message

	WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured

in kern.log, followed by billions of IO errors during mkfs.


Well, I need a mass storage whose integrity _is_ assured. Is there
any hope that ehci and usb-storage get improved for a 2.4.x kernel?
Any patches I could try?


Regards

Harri


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured?
  2003-06-22  7:12 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured? Harald Dunkel
@ 2003-06-22  8:19 ` Matthew Dharm
  2003-06-22  9:14   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
  2003-06-22  9:11 ` Harald Dunkel
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Dharm @ 2003-06-22  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Harald Dunkel; +Cc: Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]

That warning means that if you yank the device at a bad time, you could get
screwed.

Matt

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:12:16AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> This morning I tried to attach an 2.5" HD via USB2.0 to my Linux box.
> I got a message
> 
> 	WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured
> 
> in kern.log, followed by billions of IO errors during mkfs.
> 
> 
> Well, I need a mass storage whose integrity _is_ assured. Is there
> any hope that ehci and usb-storage get improved for a 2.4.x kernel?
> Any patches I could try?
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Harri
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

Stef, you just got beaten by a ball of DIRT.
					-- Greg
User Friendly, 12/7/1997

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured?
  2003-06-22  7:12 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured? Harald Dunkel
  2003-06-22  8:19 ` Matthew Dharm
@ 2003-06-22  9:11 ` Harald Dunkel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Harald Dunkel @ 2003-06-22  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Harald Dunkel

Harald Dunkel wrote:
> 
> Well, I need a mass storage whose integrity _is_ assured. Is there
> any hope that ehci and usb-storage get improved for a 2.4.x kernel?
> Any patches I could try?
> 

I found Greg's patches. Much better now.


Regards

Harri


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured?
  2003-06-22  8:19 ` Matthew Dharm
@ 2003-06-22  9:14   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eyal Lebedinsky @ 2003-06-22  9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kernel Mailing List

And IDE will be assured under similar actions? And SCSI?
And any removable media yanked without unmounting?

Either the message is useless or there is a real higer
risk with USB that with other buses - and I would like to
know what it is too.

Matthew Dharm wrote:
> 
> That warning means that if you yank the device at a bad time, you could get
> screwed.
> 
> Matt
> 
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:12:16AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This morning I tried to attach an 2.5" HD via USB2.0 to my Linux box.
> > I got a message
> >
> >       WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured
> >
> > in kern.log, followed by billions of IO errors during mkfs.
> >
> >
> > Well, I need a mass storage whose integrity _is_ assured. Is there
> > any hope that ehci and usb-storage get improved for a 2.4.x kernel?
> > Any patches I could try?

--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-22  9:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-22  7:12 2.4.21: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured? Harald Dunkel
2003-06-22  8:19 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-06-22  9:14   ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2003-06-22  9:11 ` Harald Dunkel

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.