* [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
@ 2003-07-19 17:05 Alan Cox
2003-07-20 2:17 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-07-19 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: kernel 2.4.21
> Date: 19 Jul 2003 16:38:11 +0200
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little question...
>
>
> Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5
> ============================================
>
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> o ACPI apparently wasnt bios
> o fix wrong date in microcode comment
> o add another legitimate P4 type
> o must disallow write combine on 450NX
> o add framework for ndelay (nanoseconds)
> o first block of parisc resend
> o second block of parisc merge
> o third block of parisc merge
> o Ian Nelson moved
> o update videobook docs to avoid check_region
> o docs for IPMI
> o remove dead init call
> o add AMD hammer rng
> o IPMI driver updates
> o keyboard changes
> o fix wrong test in raw driver
> o fix paths for ide
> o clarify hpt37x config
> o fix more ide paths
> o Paul's fix to do ide_cs handling in task context
> o more ide paths
> o fix use of check_region in umc driver
> o more ide comment/doc info updates
> o promise printk cleanups
> o another wrong path
> o IDE printk/cleanup bits
> o fix padding on eepro driver
>
> In this patch, is it possible that there is a problem in the fix of
> eepro driver? Since I upgrade the kernel with 2.4.20-8 (kernel-source
> tag in debian) which include this patch I have some problem with packets
> which are sometimes truncated... (the server runs an ircd and the result
> is a delink).
>
> Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
> Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
> Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
> ((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
> t af_inet.c(689)
>
> OR
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
> Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
> at tcp.c(1545)
>
>
> If I do a rollback, no more problems... I don't test yet a 2.4.21 kernel.
>
> Hardware is a Dell PowerAppWeb 120A with one CPU P3 1 GHz / 256 Mo RAM /
>
> Now Kernel is generated under debian with kernel-source-2.4.20-2 and gcc
> version 2.95.4 20011002.
>
> Any idea? (Thanks for your help)
>
> --
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
> http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-19 17:05 [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] Alan Cox
@ 2003-07-20 2:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-20 8:44 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:23 ` Cedric Gavage
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-20 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: netdev, cedric.gavage
On 19 Jul 2003 18:05:45 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
> > TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
This one was fixed in 2.4.21
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-20 2:17 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-07-20 8:44 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:23 ` Cedric Gavage
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-20 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Alan Cox, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2003 18:05:45 +0100
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>>Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
>>>TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
>
>
> This one was fixed in 2.4.21
>
Thanks for the information... I'll upgrade and test again...
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-20 2:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-20 8:44 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-23 9:23 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:35 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-23 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Alan Cox, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
>
>>>Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
>>>TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
>
>
> This one was fixed in 2.4.21
>
Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1563)
Any idea?
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 9:23 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-23 9:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 9:44 ` Cedric Gavage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-23 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cedric Gavage; +Cc: alan, netdev
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
>
> Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
> Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed at tcp.c(1563)
What interesting programs are you running on this system?
Are you running and old version of vsftpd?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 9:35 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-07-23 9:44 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:46 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-23 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: alan, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>
>
>>Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
>>
>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed at tcp.c(1563)
>
>
> What interesting programs are you running on this system?
>
> Are you running and old version of vsftpd?
>
Thanks for your help...
This server is efnet.skynet.be, ircd server connected on EFnet with
ircd-hybrid-6.4...
System is a Debian stable 3.0 aka woody (standard).
Here is the "cat /proc/version" output
Linux version 2.4.21-dell.poweredge.ppro.nosmp (root@localhost) (gcc
version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #1 Sat Jul 19 16:13:28 CEST
2003
Here is the "cat /proc/cpu" output:
fazer:/root# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 993.399
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse
bogomips : 1979.18
Here is the "cat /proc/meminfo" output:
fazer:/root# cat /proc/meminfo
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 262762496 214491136 48271360 0 6619136 83787776
Swap: 995250176 1622016 993628160
MemTotal: 256604 kB
MemFree: 47140 kB
MemShared: 0 kB
Buffers: 6464 kB
Cached: 80888 kB
SwapCached: 936 kB
Active: 61152 kB
Inactive: 122056 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 256604 kB
LowFree: 47140 kB
SwapTotal: 971924 kB
SwapFree: 970340 kB
Here is the "cat /proc/modules" output.
fazer:/root# cat /proc/modules
serial 44160 0 (autoclean)
eepro100 18060 2
mii 2480 0 [eepro100]
Here is the running process list.
fazer:/root# ps aux
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.1 1272 436 ? S Jul22 0:06 init [2]
root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [keventd]
root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SWN Jul22 0:00
[ksoftirqd_CPU0]
root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [kswapd]
root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [bdflush]
root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [kupdated]
root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [scsi_eh_0]
root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SW Jul22 0:00 [scsi_eh_1]
root 164 0.0 0.2 1340 556 ? S Jul22 1:39 /sbin/syslogd
root 167 0.0 0.4 2012 1188 ? S Jul22 0:00 /sbin/klogd
root 170 0.1 1.5 5340 4088 ? S Jul22 2:43
/usr/sbin/named
root 187 0.0 0.1 1248 420 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/inetd
root 190 0.0 0.3 5692 788 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/ippl
root 192 0.0 0.3 5692 788 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/ippl
nobody 193 0.0 0.3 5692 788 ? S Jul22 0:01
/usr/sbin/ippl
nobody 194 1.3 0.3 5692 788 ? R Jul22 22:43
/usr/sbin/ippl
ircd 197 0.6 33.8 111524 86980 ? S Jul22 10:53
/usr/local/ircd-hybrid/ircd
smmsp 224 0.0 0.6 4988 1668 ? S Jul22 0:00 sendmail:
MSP: Queue runner@00:10:0
root 228 0.0 0.8 3140 2100 ? S Jul22 0:15
/usr/sbin/snmpd -s -l /dev/null
root 230 0.0 0.3 2016 860 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/snmptrapd -s
root 236 0.0 0.3 2784 1016 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
root 239 0.0 0.7 1976 1968 ? SL Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/ntpd
daemon 242 0.0 0.2 1384 556 ? S Jul22 0:00 /usr/sbin/atd
root 245 0.0 0.2 1652 680 ? S Jul22 0:00
/usr/sbin/cron
root 248 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty1 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty1
root 249 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty2 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty2
root 250 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty3 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty3
root 251 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty4 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty4
root 252 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty5 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty5
root 253 0.0 0.1 1256 412 tty6 S Jul22 0:00
/sbin/getty 38400 tty6
root 254 0.0 1.3 8292 3356 ? S Jul22 0:00
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc
root 255 0.0 1.3 8292 3356 ? S Jul22 0:00
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc
root 256 0.0 1.3 8292 3356 ? S Jul22 0:00
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc
root 3366 0.0 0.6 5732 1708 ? S 11:37 0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
root 3368 0.0 0.5 2464 1332 pts/0 S 11:37 0:00 -bash
root 3394 7.0 0.6 5732 1708 ? R 11:42 0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
root 3396 0.0 0.5 2456 1312 pts/1 S 11:42 0:00 -bash
root 3413 0.0 0.6 3544 1568 pts/1 R 11:42 0:00 ps aux
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 9:44 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-23 9:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 11:30 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 11:40 ` Cedric Gavage
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-23 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cedric Gavage; +Cc: alan, netdev
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200
> > Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> >>Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
> >>
> >>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
> >>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed at tcp.c(1563)
> > Are you running and old version of vsftpd?
>
> Thanks for your help...
>
> This server is efnet.skynet.be, ircd server connected on EFnet with
> ircd-hybrid-6.4...
Any chance you can try with the e100 driver instead of eepro100?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 9:46 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-07-23 11:30 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 11:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 11:40 ` Cedric Gavage
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-23 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: alan, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>
>
>>David S. Miller wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200
>>>Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
>>>>
>>>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
>>>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed at tcp.c(1563)
>>>
>>>Are you running and old version of vsftpd?
>>
>>Thanks for your help...
>>
>>This server is efnet.skynet.be, ircd server connected on EFnet with
>>ircd-hybrid-6.4...
>
>
> Any chance you can try with the e100 driver instead of eepro100?
>
Could I use it with these cards?
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker
http://www.scyld.com/netwo
rk/eepro100.html
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17
Modified by Andrey V. Savoc
hkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: eth0: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro
100], 00:B0:D0:B0:D0:FB, I
RQ 16.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling
work-around.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Board assembly 07195d-000, Physical
connectors present: RJ45
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: General self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Internal registers self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Receiver lock-up workaround activated.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: eth1: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro
100] (#2), 00:B0:D0:B0:D0:
FC, IRQ 17.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling
work-around.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Board assembly 07195d-000, Physical
connectors present: RJ45
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: General self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Internal registers self-test: passed.
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
Jul 22 07:55:39 fazer kernel: Receiver lock-up workaround activated.
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 11:30 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-23 11:40 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-23 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cedric Gavage; +Cc: alan, netdev
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:30:09 +0200
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > Any chance you can try with the e100 driver instead of eepro100?
> Could I use it with these cards?
Yes, if anything, e100 works with more cards than
eepro100 does. e100 is supported well, whereas I can't
remember the last time eepro100 had a change made to it :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 9:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 11:30 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-23 11:40 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-27 23:34 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-23 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: alan, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>
>
>>David S. Miller wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200
>>>Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100)
>>>>
>>>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 7CB284C0 seq 7CB288AE
>>>>Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed at tcp.c(1563)
>>>
>>>Are you running and old version of vsftpd?
>>
>>Thanks for your help...
>>
>>This server is efnet.skynet.be, ircd server connected on EFnet with
>>ircd-hybrid-6.4...
>
>
> Any chance you can try with the e100 driver instead of eepro100?
>
Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
problems, thanks for your help.
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-23 11:40 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-27 23:34 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 7:39 ` Cedric Gavage
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-27 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cedric Gavage; +Cc: alan, netdev
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
> problems, thanks for your help.
Any problems yet?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-27 23:34 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-07-28 7:39 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-28 14:32 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Cedric Gavage @ 2003-07-28 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: alan, netdev
David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>
>
>>Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
>>problems, thanks for your help.
>
>
> Any problems yet?
>
It's ok now... I was waiting some hours (days) to see if it was really ok ;)
Thanks for your help.
--
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-28 7:39 ` Cedric Gavage
@ 2003-07-28 14:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-07-28 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cedric Gavage; +Cc: alan, jgarzik, netdev
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:39:11 +0200
Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200
> > Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> >
> >>Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
> >>problems, thanks for your help.
> >
> > Any problems yet?
>
> It's ok now... I was waiting some hours (days) to see if it was really ok ;)
>
> Thanks for your help.
No problem.
Alan and Jeff, please note, executive summary:
1) 'eepro100' driver in 2.4.x + high end EFNET IRC server == crashes
2) same as #1 using 'e100' driver == works
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-28 14:32 ` David S. Miller
@ 2003-07-28 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-28 15:30 ` Felix Radensky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-07-28 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: Cedric Gavage, alan, netdev
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:32:40AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:39:11 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
>
> > David S. Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200
> > > Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
> > >>problems, thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Any problems yet?
> >
> > It's ok now... I was waiting some hours (days) to see if it was really ok ;)
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
>
> No problem.
>
> Alan and Jeff, please note, executive summary:
>
> 1) 'eepro100' driver in 2.4.x + high end EFNET IRC server == crashes
> 2) same as #1 using 'e100' driver == works
My Official Story(tm) is currently
* use e100
* unless you really really want to use eepro100
eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained. One of the
big reasons I merged e100 is that it has an active maintainer with
full access to docs.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]
2003-07-28 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-07-28 15:30 ` Felix Radensky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Felix Radensky @ 2003-07-28 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: David S. Miller, Cedric Gavage, alan, netdev
Then maybe it makes sense to enable e100 by default and not eepro100 ?
Felix.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>My Official Story(tm) is currently
>
>* use e100
>* unless you really really want to use eepro100
>
>eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained. One of the
>big reasons I merged e100 is that it has an active maintainer with
>full access to docs.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-28 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-19 17:05 [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] Alan Cox
2003-07-20 2:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-20 8:44 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:23 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 9:44 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 9:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 11:30 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-23 11:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 11:40 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-27 23:34 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 7:39 ` Cedric Gavage
2003-07-28 14:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-28 15:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-28 15:30 ` Felix Radensky
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.