[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[James Smart]

Correct WQ creation for pagesize

The driver was calculating the adapter command pagesize indicator from
the system pagesize. However, the buffers the driver allocates are only
one size (SLI4_PAGE_SIZE), so no calculation was necessary.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h | 2 ++
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
index 5646699..964a1fd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
@@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ struct lpfc_mbx_wq_create {
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_SHIFT	0
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_MASK	0x000000FF
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_WORD	word1
+#define LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096	0x1
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_SHIFT	8
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_MASK	0x0000000F
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_WORD	word1
@@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ struct rq_context {
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_SHIFT	0		/* Version 1 Only */
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_MASK	0x000000FF
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_WORD	word0
+#define	LPFC_RQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096	0x1
 	uint32_t reserved1;
 	uint32_t word2;
 #define lpfc_rq_context_cq_id_SHIFT	16
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 3a8470d..dbe9cb1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -13715,7 +13715,7 @@ lpfc_wq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *wq,
 			       LPFC_WQ_WQE_SIZE_128);
 			bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size,
 			       &wq_create->u.request_1,
-			       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+			       LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 			page = wq_create->u.request_1.page;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -13741,8 +13741,9 @@ lpfc_wq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *wq,
 			       LPFC_WQ_WQE_SIZE_128);
 			break;
 		}
-		bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size, &wq_create->u.request_1,
-		       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+		bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size,
+		       &wq_create->u.request_1,
+		       LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 		page = wq_create->u.request_1.page;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -13928,7 +13929,7 @@ lpfc_rq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *hrq,
 		       LPFC_RQE_SIZE_8);
 		bf_set(lpfc_rq_context_page_size,
 		       &rq_create->u.request.context,
-		       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+		       LPFC_RQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 	} else {
 		switch (hrq->entry_count) {
 		default:
-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[James Smart]

Correct WQ creation for pagesize

The driver was calculating the adapter command pagesize indicator from
the system pagesize. However, the buffers the driver allocates are only
one size (SLI4_PAGE_SIZE), so no calculation was necessary.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy at broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart at broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn at suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h | 2 ++
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
index 5646699..964a1fd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
@@ -1186,6 +1186,7 @@ struct lpfc_mbx_wq_create {
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_SHIFT	0
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_MASK	0x000000FF
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size_WORD	word1
+#define LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096	0x1
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_SHIFT	8
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_MASK	0x0000000F
 #define lpfc_mbx_wq_create_wqe_size_WORD	word1
@@ -1257,6 +1258,7 @@ struct rq_context {
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_SHIFT	0		/* Version 1 Only */
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_MASK	0x000000FF
 #define lpfc_rq_context_page_size_WORD	word0
+#define	LPFC_RQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096	0x1
 	uint32_t reserved1;
 	uint32_t word2;
 #define lpfc_rq_context_cq_id_SHIFT	16
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 3a8470d..dbe9cb1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -13715,7 +13715,7 @@ lpfc_wq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *wq,
 			       LPFC_WQ_WQE_SIZE_128);
 			bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size,
 			       &wq_create->u.request_1,
-			       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+			       LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 			page = wq_create->u.request_1.page;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -13741,8 +13741,9 @@ lpfc_wq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *wq,
 			       LPFC_WQ_WQE_SIZE_128);
 			break;
 		}
-		bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size, &wq_create->u.request_1,
-		       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+		bf_set(lpfc_mbx_wq_create_page_size,
+		       &wq_create->u.request_1,
+		       LPFC_WQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 		page = wq_create->u.request_1.page;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -13928,7 +13929,7 @@ lpfc_rq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *hrq,
 		       LPFC_RQE_SIZE_8);
 		bf_set(lpfc_rq_context_page_size,
 		       &rq_create->u.request.context,
-		       (PAGE_SIZE/SLI4_PAGE_SIZE));
+		       LPFC_RQ_PAGE_SIZE_4096);
 	} else {
 		switch (hrq->entry_count) {
 		default:
-- 
2.5.0

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hi Martin and James,

On 02/12/2017 07:52 PM, James Smart wrote:
> Correct WQ creation for pagesize

Reviewed-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Please flag this patch for stable.

This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at least.

An (apparently constant) series of invalid iotags cause a series of
SCSI command aborts that escalates into host reset, which fails too, 
bringing the adapter offline.

And it takes forever to boot, as udev waits on the initial SCSI I/O.

Thank you.


[   17.044690] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:0372 iotag x0 is out off range: max 
iotag (x840)
...
[  723.680700] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):0714 SCSI layer issued Bus Reset 
Data: x2003
[  723.680873] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):3172 SCSI layer issued Host 
Reset Data:
[  724.052506] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:0383 Error -5 during scsi sgl post 
operation
[  724.052701] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):3323 Failed host reset, bring it 
offline


-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hi Martin and James,

On 02/12/2017 07:52 PM, James Smart wrote:
> Correct WQ creation for pagesize

Reviewed-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo at linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Please flag this patch for stable.

This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at least.

An (apparently constant) series of invalid iotags cause a series of
SCSI command aborts that escalates into host reset, which fails too, 
bringing the adapter offline.

And it takes forever to boot, as udev waits on the initial SCSI I/O.

Thank you.


[   17.044690] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:0372 iotag x0 is out off range: max 
iotag (x840)
...
[  723.680700] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):0714 SCSI layer issued Bus Reset 
Data: x2003
[  723.680873] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):3172 SCSI layer issued Host 
Reset Data:
[  724.052506] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:0383 Error -5 during scsi sgl post 
operation
[  724.052701] lpfc 0000:01:00.1: 1:(0):3323 Failed host reset, bring it 
offline


-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Mauricio" == Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

Mauricio,

Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.

Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
Mauricio> least.

Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
you or James should mail stable@vger.kernel.org and request for the
patches to be queued up.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Mauricio" == Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

Mauricio,

Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.

Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
Mauricio> least.

Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
you or James should mail stable at vger.kernel.org and request for the
patches to be queued up.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hi Martin,

On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.

> Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> you or James should mail stable@vger.kernel.org and request for the
> patches to be queued up.

Right, sorry; I missed checking the right tree. Thanks for the pointers.


-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hi Martin,

On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.

> Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> you or James should mail stable at vger.kernel.org and request for the
> patches to be queued up.

Right, sorry; I missed checking the right tree. Thanks for the pointers.


-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hello stable kernel maintainers,

On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.
>
> Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
> Mauricio> least.
>
> Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> you or James should mail stable@vger.kernel.org and request for the
> patches to be queued up.

Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)

     8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ 
creation for pagesize"

Thanks!


For documentation purposes, the resolved issue is described on [1].

Following is the rationale for the stable kernel version asked for, in
case Broadcom/others would like to discuss/contribute.

These are the 3 commits which introduced the lines changed by the 
desired fix commit

     0c651878ba3018bb4bbfa2ccd0a876bebb618768 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.41: Fixed 
support for 128 byte WQEs"
     5a6f133eea2d0b4f8f75367b803fef0f03acf268 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.22: Add 
new mailbox command and new BSG fix"
     c31098cef5e091e22a02ff255f911e0ad71cc393 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.23: Fixes 
related to new hardware"

So, checking the oldest release git tag which contains the most recent
commit (so the fix applies cleanly)

     $ git tag --contains 0c651878ba3018bb4bbfa2ccd0a876bebb618768 | 
grep -v rc | sort -V
     v3.12
     <...>
     v4.10

And it is cherry-picked/applies cleanly on v3.12:

     $ git checkout -b lpfc-v3.12 v3.12
     Switched to a new branch 'lpfc-v3.12'

     $ git cherry-pick 8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28
     [lpfc-v3.12 c2b0912e6135] scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize
     Author: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
     2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

However, v3.12 seems too old to go back, and it's unclear whether there
was any problem actually reported on these older kernel releases, or
whether the hardware/configuration that reproduces this problem is
supported on v3.12 at all.

On PowerPC (which is directly affected by the fix, as at least IBM
Power servers uses a 64k page size by default on most distros), this
fix is probably only required on v4.4+, so to cover a distro for which
Broadcom doesn't ship inbox drivers to (w/ fix included).

So, I'll ask it for stable v4.4+, and Broadcom/others can expand the
range if they see fit/required.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg105886.html

cheers,

-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Mauricio Faria de Oliveira]

Hello stable kernel maintainers,

On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.
>
> Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
> Mauricio> least.
>
> Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> you or James should mail stable at vger.kernel.org and request for the
> patches to be queued up.

Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)

     8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ 
creation for pagesize"

Thanks!


For documentation purposes, the resolved issue is described on [1].

Following is the rationale for the stable kernel version asked for, in
case Broadcom/others would like to discuss/contribute.

These are the 3 commits which introduced the lines changed by the 
desired fix commit

     0c651878ba3018bb4bbfa2ccd0a876bebb618768 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.41: Fixed 
support for 128 byte WQEs"
     5a6f133eea2d0b4f8f75367b803fef0f03acf268 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.22: Add 
new mailbox command and new BSG fix"
     c31098cef5e091e22a02ff255f911e0ad71cc393 "[SCSI] lpfc 8.3.23: Fixes 
related to new hardware"

So, checking the oldest release git tag which contains the most recent
commit (so the fix applies cleanly)

     $ git tag --contains 0c651878ba3018bb4bbfa2ccd0a876bebb618768 | 
grep -v rc | sort -V
     v3.12
     <...>
     v4.10

And it is cherry-picked/applies cleanly on v3.12:

     $ git checkout -b lpfc-v3.12 v3.12
     Switched to a new branch 'lpfc-v3.12'

     $ git cherry-pick 8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28
     [lpfc-v3.12 c2b0912e6135] scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize
     Author: James Smart <jsmart2021 at gmail.com>
     2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

However, v3.12 seems too old to go back, and it's unclear whether there
was any problem actually reported on these older kernel releases, or
whether the hardware/configuration that reproduces this problem is
supported on v3.12 at all.

On PowerPC (which is directly affected by the fix, as at least IBM
Power servers uses a 64k page size by default on most distros), this
fix is probably only required on v4.4+, so to cover a distro for which
Broadcom doesn't ship inbox drivers to (w/ fix included).

So, I'll ask it for stable v4.4+, and Broadcom/others can expand the
range if they see fit/required.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg105886.html

cheers,

-- 
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:44:51AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello stable kernel maintainers,
> 
> On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.
> > 
> > Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
> > Mauricio> least.
> > 
> > Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> > you or James should mail stable@vger.kernel.org and request for the
> > patches to be queued up.
> 
> Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)
> 
>     8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ
> creation for pagesize"

I need an ack from a scsi maintainer that this is an ok thing to do
before I can do so.

thanks,

greg k-h

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017@10:44:51AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello stable kernel maintainers,
> 
> On 03/07/2017 12:35 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > Mauricio> Please flag this patch for stable.
> > 
> > Mauricio> This patch resolves a serious problem on IBM Power systems at
> > Mauricio> least.
> > 
> > Both patches are already upstream so I can't tag them for stable. Either
> > you or James should mail stable at vger.kernel.org and request for the
> > patches to be queued up.
> 
> Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)
> 
>     8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ
> creation for pagesize"

I need an ack from a scsi maintainer that this is an ok thing to do
before I can do so.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Greg" == Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

Greg,

>> Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)
>> 
>> 8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ
>> creation for pagesize"

Greg> I need an ack from a scsi maintainer that this is an ok thing to
Greg> do before I can do so.

It's fine with me. This was merged as part of a bigger driver update.
And as a result, the patch in question wasn't tagged as a fix/stable
candidate.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[PATCH v3 01/16] lpfc: Correct WQ creation for pagesize

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Greg" == Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> writes:

Greg,

>> Can this commit be included on stable v4.4+ , please? (in Linus tree)
>> 
>> 8ea73db486cda442f0671f4bc9c03a76be398a28 "scsi: lpfc: Correct WQ
>> creation for pagesize"

Greg> I need an ack from a scsi maintainer that this is an ok thing to
Greg> do before I can do so.

It's fine with me. This was merged as part of a bigger driver update.
And as a result, the patch in question wasn't tagged as a fix/stable
candidate.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering