[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] fixes for device event

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] fixes for device event

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

This series include three fixes patches for device event.

---
v4:
 * add fix a wrong returned value
 * remove redundant check suggested by David Marchand

v3:
 * modified the format.

Yunjian Wang (3):
  eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb
  eal: return error code when failure
  eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

The event_cb->dev_name is not freed when freeing event_cb,
and this causes a memory leak.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index 9e4f09d..363a2ca 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
 		 */
 		if (event_cb->active == 0) {
 			TAILQ_REMOVE(&dev_event_cbs, event_cb, next);
+			free(event_cb->dev_name);
 			free(event_cb);
 			ret++;
 		} else {
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb

[wangyunjian]

Ping for review.

Thanks,
Yunjian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wangyunjian
> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 5:46 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: jia.guo@intel.com; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>; xudingke
> <xudingke@huawei.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing
> event_cb
> 
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> 
> The event_cb->dev_name is not freed when freeing event_cb, and this causes a
> memory leak.
> 
> Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> index 9e4f09d..363a2ca 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev,
> const void *_name)
>  		 */
>  		if (event_cb->active == 0) {
>  			TAILQ_REMOVE(&dev_event_cbs, event_cb, next);
> +			free(event_cb->dev_name);
>  			free(event_cb);
>  			ret++;
>  		} else {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb

[Jeff Guo]

hi, yunjian

The patch seems no problem, but when you update your patch, please add 
other guys who had comment on your patch and maintainer to see if they have

other opinion, and --in-reply-to is also helpful for patch review, thanks.

On 7/29/2020 7:47 PM, wangyunjian wrote:
> Ping for review.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunjian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wangyunjian
>> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 5:46 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: jia.guo@intel.com; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>; xudingke
>> <xudingke@huawei.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>;
>> stable@dpdk.org
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing
>> event_cb
>>
>> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>>
>> The event_cb->dev_name is not freed when freeing event_cb, and this causes a
>> memory leak.
>>
>> Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
>> index 9e4f09d..363a2ca 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
>> @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev,
>> const void *_name)
>>   		 */
>>   		if (event_cb->active == 0) {
>>   			TAILQ_REMOVE(&dev_event_cbs, event_cb, next);
>> +			free(event_cb->dev_name);
>>   			free(event_cb);
>>   			ret++;
>>   		} else {
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1


Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] eal: return error code when failure

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

Fix return value, using -EAGAIN instead of 0 when the callback is busy
and using -ENOENT instead of 0 when the callback is not found.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index 363a2ca..d990bfd 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -530,9 +530,15 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
 			free(event_cb);
 			ret++;
 		} else {
-			continue;
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+	/* this callback is not be registered */
+	if (ret == 0)
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index d990bfd..2a097aa 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
 				void *cb_arg)
 {
 	struct dev_event_callback *event_cb;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!cb_fn)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
 	}
 
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 error:
 	free(event_cb);
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[David Marchand]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 11:47 AM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.
>
> Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> index d990bfd..2a097aa 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
>                                 void *cb_arg)
>  {
>         struct dev_event_callback *event_cb;
> -       int ret;
> +       int ret = 0;
>
>         if (!cb_fn)
>                 return -EINVAL;
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_name)
>         }
>
>         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> -       return 0;
> +       return ret;
>  error:
>         free(event_cb);
>         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> --
> 1.8.3.1

A simpler fix is to directly jump to the error label.
This has the advantage of having all errors go through a single cleanup code:

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index 9e4f09d83e..fa47074b0b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_register(const char *device_name,
                RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
                        "The callback is already exist, no need "
                        "to register again.\n");
+               event_cb = NULL;
                ret = -EEXIST;
+               goto error;
        }

        rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);

What do you think?


-- 
David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[wangyunjian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 9:19 PM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>; Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>; xudingke
> <xudingke@huawei.com>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned
> value when callback exists
> 
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 11:47 AM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> >
> > We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.
> >
> > Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > index d990bfd..2a097aa 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device
> *dev, const void *_name)
> >                                 void *cb_arg)  {
> >         struct dev_event_callback *event_cb;
> > -       int ret;
> > +       int ret = 0;
> >
> >         if (!cb_fn)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device
> *dev, const void *_name)
> >         }
> >
> >         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> > -       return 0;
> > +       return ret;
> >  error:
> >         free(event_cb);
> >         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> 
> A simpler fix is to directly jump to the error label.
> This has the advantage of having all errors go through a single cleanup code:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> index 9e4f09d83e..fa47074b0b 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,9 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_register(const char
> *device_name,
>                 RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
>                         "The callback is already exist, no need "
>                         "to register again.\n");
> +               event_cb = NULL;
>                 ret = -EEXIST;
> +               goto error;
>         }
> 
>         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> 
> What do you think?

Agree, I will update it in next version.

Yunjian

> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] fixes for device event

[wangyunjian]

Hi, Ferruh Yigit & David Marchand

Could you please give any suggestion?

Thanks,
Yunjian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wangyunjian
> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 5:44 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: jia.guo@intel.com; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>; xudingke
> <xudingke@huawei.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] fixes for device event
> 
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> 
> This series include three fixes patches for device event.
> 
> ---
> v4:
>  * add fix a wrong returned value
>  * remove redundant check suggested by David Marchand
> 
> v3:
>  * modified the format.
> 
> Yunjian Wang (3):
>   eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb
>   eal: return error code when failure
>   eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists
> 
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> 

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] fixes for device event

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

This series include three fixes patches for device event.

---
v5:
 * update patch 3/3 code styles suggested by David Marchand

v4:
 * add fix a wrong returned value
 * remove redundant check suggested by David Marchand

v3:
 * modified the format.

Yunjian Wang (3):
  eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb
  eal: return error code when failure
  eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.23.0

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

The event_cb->dev_name is not freed when freeing event_cb,
and this causes a memory leak.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index 9e4f09d83e..363a2ca95e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_unregister(const char *device_name,
 		 */
 		if (event_cb->active == 0) {
 			TAILQ_REMOVE(&dev_event_cbs, event_cb, next);
+			free(event_cb->dev_name);
 			free(event_cb);
 			ret++;
 		} else {
-- 
2.23.0

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] eal: return error code when failure

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

Fix return value, using -EAGAIN instead of 0 when the callback is busy
and using -ENOENT instead of 0 when the callback is not found.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index 363a2ca95e..d990bfd20d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -530,9 +530,15 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_unregister(const char *device_name,
 			free(event_cb);
 			ret++;
 		} else {
-			continue;
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+	/* this callback is not be registered */
+	if (ret == 0)
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.23.0

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] eal: return error code when failure

[David Marchand]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> Fix return value, using -EAGAIN instead of 0 when the callback is busy
> and using -ENOENT instead of 0 when the callback is not found.
>
> Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

This API is experimental, its description is vague enough and we can
change it in the current release.
But I see this as a change in behavior for existing users, not a fix
and I would not backport it.

Opinions?


>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> index 363a2ca95e..d990bfd20d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> @@ -530,9 +530,15 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_unregister(const char *device_name,
>                         free(event_cb);
>                         ret++;
>                 } else {
> -                       continue;
> +                       ret = -EAGAIN;
> +                       break;
>                 }
>         }
> +
> +       /* this callback is not be registered */
> +       if (ret == 0)
> +               ret = -ENOENT;
> +
>         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
>         return ret;
>  }
> --
> 2.23.0
>


-- 
David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] eal: return error code when failure

[wangyunjian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:52 PM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>;
> xudingke <xudingke@huawei.com>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Kevin
> Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] eal: return error code when failure
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:19 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> >
> > Fix return value, using -EAGAIN instead of 0 when the callback is busy
> > and using -ENOENT instead of 0 when the callback is not found.
> >
> > Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> This API is experimental, its description is vague enough and we can change it
> in the current release.
> But I see this as a change in behavior for existing users, not a fix and I would
> not backport it.
> 
> Opinions?

Agree, not backport it.

Yunjian

> 
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > index 363a2ca95e..d990bfd20d 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > @@ -530,9 +530,15 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_unregister(const char
> *device_name,
> >                         free(event_cb);
> >                         ret++;
> >                 } else {
> > -                       continue;
> > +                       ret = -EAGAIN;
> > +                       break;
> >                 }
> >         }
> > +
> > +       /* this callback is not be registered */
> > +       if (ret == 0)
> > +               ret = -ENOENT;
> > +
> >         rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[wangyunjian]

From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>

We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.

Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
index d990bfd20d..8a3bd3100a 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@ rte_dev_event_callback_register(const char *device_name,
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
 			"The callback is already exist, no need "
 			"to register again.\n");
+		event_cb = NULL;
 		ret = -EEXIST;
+		goto error;
 	}
 
 	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
-- 
2.23.0

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[David Marchand]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:20 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.
>
> Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Same question as for the previous patch, should we backport this?


-- 
David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists

[wangyunjian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 8:55 PM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob
> Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>;
> xudingke <xudingke@huawei.com>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Kevin
> Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when
> callback exists
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:20 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> >
> > We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist.
> >
> > Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Same question as for the previous patch, should we backport this?

Agree, not backport it.

Yunjian

> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] fixes for device event

[David Marchand]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:18 PM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> This series include three fixes patches for device event.

For the series,
Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.


-- 
David Marchand