All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
@ 2021-02-07 19:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2021-02-07 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, Vivien Didelot, Florian Fainelli, netdev,
	linux-kernel, bridge, Roopa Prabhu, Nikolay Aleksandrov,
	Jiri Pirko, Ido Schimmel

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
functionality.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/

Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
@@ -59,9 +59,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\
 static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		      unsigned long mask)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	flags = p->flags;
+	unsigned long flags = p->flags;
+	int err;
 
 	if (v)
 		flags |= mask;
@@ -69,6 +68,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		flags &= ~mask;
 
 	if (flags != p->flags) {
+		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
 		p->flags = flags;
 		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
@ 2021-02-07 19:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2021-02-07 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, Florian Fainelli, Jiri Pirko, netdev, bridge,
	linux-kernel, Ido Schimmel, Nikolay Aleksandrov, Roopa Prabhu,
	Vivien Didelot

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
functionality.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/

Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
@@ -59,9 +59,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\
 static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		      unsigned long mask)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	flags = p->flags;
+	unsigned long flags = p->flags;
+	int err;
 
 	if (v)
 		flags |= mask;
@@ -69,6 +68,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
 		flags &= ~mask;
 
 	if (flags != p->flags) {
+		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
 		p->flags = flags;
 		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
  2021-02-07 19:47 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
@ 2021-02-08 11:11   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2021-02-08 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vladimir Oltean, Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, Vivien Didelot, Florian Fainelli, netdev,
	linux-kernel, bridge, Roopa Prabhu, Jiri Pirko, Ido Schimmel

On 07/02/2021 21:47, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
> 
> Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> @@ -59,9 +59,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\
>  static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
>  		      unsigned long mask)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	flags = p->flags;
> +	unsigned long flags = p->flags;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	if (v)
>  		flags |= mask;
> @@ -69,6 +68,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
>  		flags &= ~mask;
>  
>  	if (flags != p->flags) {
> +		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
>  		p->flags = flags;
>  		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);
>  	}
> 

Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
@ 2021-02-08 11:11   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2021-02-08 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vladimir Oltean, Jakub Kicinski, David S. Miller
  Cc: Andrew Lunn, Florian Fainelli, Jiri Pirko, netdev, bridge,
	linux-kernel, Ido Schimmel, Roopa Prabhu, Vivien Didelot

On 07/02/2021 21:47, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/
> 
> Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> index 96ff63cde1be..5aea9427ffe1 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
> @@ -59,9 +59,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644,					\
>  static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
>  		      unsigned long mask)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	flags = p->flags;
> +	unsigned long flags = p->flags;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	if (v)
>  		flags |= mask;
> @@ -69,6 +68,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v,
>  		flags &= ~mask;
>  
>  	if (flags != p->flags) {
> +		err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
>  		p->flags = flags;
>  		br_port_flags_change(p, mask);
>  	}
> 

Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
  2021-02-07 19:47 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
@ 2021-02-08 23:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-02-08 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vladimir Oltean
  Cc: kuba, davem, andrew, vivien.didelot, f.fainelli, netdev,
	linux-kernel, bridge, roopa, nikolay, jiri, idosch

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Sun,  7 Feb 2021 21:47:33 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8043c845b63a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
@ 2021-02-08 23:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-02-08 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vladimir Oltean
  Cc: andrew, f.fainelli, jiri, netdev, bridge, linux-kernel,
	vivien.didelot, idosch, nikolay, roopa, kuba, davem

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Sun,  7 Feb 2021 21:47:33 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8043c845b63a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-08 23:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-07 19:47 [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-07 19:47 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-08 11:11 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-08 11:11   ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2021-02-08 23:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-02-08 23:50   ` [Bridge] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.