All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* How to detect libbfd when building tools/bpf?
@ 2018-04-22  7:51 Wang Sheng-Hui
  2018-04-23 10:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Sheng-Hui @ 2018-04-22  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ast, daniel, kstewart, gregkh, tglx, pombredanne; +Cc: netdev

Sorry to trouble you !

I run debian and installed binutils-dev beforehand.
Then I copied tools/build/feature/test-libbfd.c to t.c and run:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@lazyfintech:~# cat t.c 
#include <bfd.h>

extern int printf(const char *format, ...);

int main(void)
{
	char symbol[4096] = "FieldName__9ClassNameFd";
	char *tmp;

	tmp = bfd_demangle(0, symbol, 0);

	printf("demangled symbol: {%s}\n", tmp);

	return 0;
}
root@lazyfintech:~# gcc t.c -lbfd
root@lazyfintech:~# ./a.out 
demangled symbol: {ClassName::FieldName}


I thought libbfd can be reached from above. 
But when I built tools/bpf, libbfd cannot be detected: 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/linux# make O=../buildkernel/ tools/bpf
make[1]: Entering directory '/root/buildkernel'
  DESCEND  bpf

Auto-detecting system features:
...                        libbfd: [ OFF ]
...        disassembler-four-args: [ on  ]

  DESCEND  bpftool

Auto-detecting system features:
...                        libbfd: [ OFF ]
...        disassembler-four-args: [ on  ]

make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/buildkernel'


I wonder how should I do to get libbfd auto detected when  building bpf tool?


Regards,
shenghui

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: How to detect libbfd when building tools/bpf?
  2018-04-22  7:51 How to detect libbfd when building tools/bpf? Wang Sheng-Hui
@ 2018-04-23 10:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
       [not found]   ` <5ade9631.046f370a.24af5.a921SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2018-04-23 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang Sheng-Hui, ast, kstewart, gregkh, tglx, pombredanne
  Cc: netdev, acme, jakub.kicinski, quentin.monnet

On 04/22/2018 09:51 AM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> Sorry to trouble you !
> 
> I run debian and installed binutils-dev beforehand.
> Then I copied tools/build/feature/test-libbfd.c to t.c and run:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> root@lazyfintech:~# cat t.c 
> #include <bfd.h>
> 
> extern int printf(const char *format, ...);
> 
> int main(void)
> {
> 	char symbol[4096] = "FieldName__9ClassNameFd";
> 	char *tmp;
> 
> 	tmp = bfd_demangle(0, symbol, 0);
> 
> 	printf("demangled symbol: {%s}\n", tmp);
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> root@lazyfintech:~# gcc t.c -lbfd

Can you run with 'gcc t.c -lbfd -lz -liberty -ldl' since this is
what the Makefile for the feature test is doing:

  $(OUTPUT)test-libbfd.bin:
        $(BUILD) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' -lbfd -lz -liberty -ldl

Seems most likely that you're missing some of the remaining libs
to have the feature test properly detect it?

> root@lazyfintech:~# ./a.out 
> demangled symbol: {ClassName::FieldName}
> 
> 
> I thought libbfd can be reached from above. 
> But when I built tools/bpf, libbfd cannot be detected: 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /linux# make O=../buildkernel/ tools/bpf
> make[1]: Entering directory '/root/buildkernel'
>   DESCEND  bpf
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ...                        libbfd: [ OFF ]
> ...        disassembler-four-args: [ on  ]
> 
>   DESCEND  bpftool
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ...                        libbfd: [ OFF ]
> ...        disassembler-four-args: [ on  ]
> 
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/buildkernel'
> 
> 
> I wonder how should I do to get libbfd auto detected when  building bpf tool?
> 
> Regards,
> shenghui

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: How to detect libbfd when building tools/bpf?
       [not found]   ` <5ade9631.046f370a.24af5.a921SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
@ 2018-04-25 12:01     ` Quentin Monnet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2018-04-25 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shhuiw, Daniel Borkmann
  Cc: ast, kstewart, gregkh, tglx, pombredanne, netdev, acme, jakub.kicinski

2018-04-24 10:27 UTC+0800 ~ shhuiw <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
> 
> 
> On 04/23/18 18:05, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 04/22/2018 09:51 AM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
>>> Sorry to trouble you !
>>>
>>> I run debian and installed binutils-dev beforehand.
>>> Then I copied tools/build/feature/test-libbfd.c to t.c and run:
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> root@lazyfintech:~# cat t.c
>>> #include <bfd.h>
>>>
>>> extern int printf(const char *format, ...);
>>>
>>> int main(void)
>>> {
>>>     char symbol[4096] = "FieldName__9ClassNameFd";
>>>     char *tmp;
>>>
>>>     tmp = bfd_demangle(0, symbol, 0);
>>>
>>>     printf("demangled symbol: {%s}\n", tmp);
- On some distributions (e.g. OpenSUSE), there is no default alias
>>>
>>>     return 0;
>>> }
>>> root@lazyfintech:~# gcc t.c -lbfd
>> Can you run with 'gcc t.c -lbfd -lz -liberty -ldl' since this is
>> what the Makefile for the feature test is doing:
>>
>>    $(OUTPUT)test-libbfd.bin:
>>          $(BUILD) -DPACKAGE='"perf"' -lbfd -lz -liberty -ldl
>>
>> Seems most likely that you're missing some of the remaining libs
>> to have the feature test properly detect it?
> I missed the lib iberty. After the lib installed, the auto-detect can work.
> 
> Thanks, Daniel!

For the record, we (at least Jakub and I) know about this issue with
libbfd detection for bpf tools. In theory the Makefile *should* refuse
to build if libbfd is not detected (since libbfd is required), but
checking the result from the detection was apparently omitted when
detection itself was added to the Makefile. This would be trivial to
patch in the Makefile, but I would like to have the detection itself
fixed before that:

- On some distributions (e.g. OpenSUSE), there is no default alias
libbfd.so to libbfd-<version>.so, which causes the static library
libbfd.a to be picked. But the latter does not include libiberty, which
must be available on the system, and called on the command line
("-liberty") for the feature to be detected (or for bpftool to be compiled).

- Some other distributions (e.g. Debian and derivatives) have this
alias, and for them it is not required to link against any version of
libiberty (it seems to be already included in libbfd.so). On such
systems, installing libiberty is not a requirement to compile the tools.

So fixing the Makefile to make libbfd detection mandatory would force
all users to install libiberty to compile bpftool, when it is actually
not required for many of them. I have proposed, internally, a couple of
patches to fix libbfd detection, but I haven't found something clean
enough so far to propose it on this list. But I intend to come back to
it and to fix it eventually, so that libbfd detection would no longer
appear as "OFF" when all needed components are present on the system.

Cheers,
Quentin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-25 12:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-22  7:51 How to detect libbfd when building tools/bpf? Wang Sheng-Hui
2018-04-23 10:05 ` Daniel Borkmann
     [not found]   ` <5ade9631.046f370a.24af5.a921SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2018-04-25 12:01     ` Quentin Monnet

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.