All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V5] brd: check and limit max_part par
@ 2020-02-04  2:44 Zhiqiang Liu
  2020-02-04  8:52 ` Ming Lei
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhiqiang Liu @ 2020-02-04  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe
  Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, Mingfangsen, wubo (T), Guiyao, Yanxiaodan


In brd_init func, rd_nr num of brd_device are firstly allocated
and add in brd_devices, then brd_devices are traversed to add each
brd_device by calling add_disk func. When allocating brd_device,
the disk->first_minor is set to i * max_part, if rd_nr * max_part
is larger than MINORMASK, two different brd_device may have the same
devt, then only one of them can be successfully added.
when rmmod brd.ko, it will cause oops when calling brd_exit.

Follow those steps:
  # modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1048576
  # rmmod brd
then, the oops will appear.

Oops log:
[  726.613722] Call trace:
[  726.614175]  kernfs_find_ns+0x24/0x130
[  726.614852]  kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x44/0x68
[  726.615749]  sysfs_remove_group+0x38/0xb0
[  726.616520]  blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x1c/0x28
[  726.617320]  blk_unregister_queue+0x98/0x100
[  726.618105]  del_gendisk+0x144/0x2b8
[  726.618759]  brd_exit+0x68/0x560 [brd]
[  726.619501]  __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x19c/0x2a0
[  726.620384]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
[  726.621057]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
[  726.621738]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
[  726.622259] Code: aa0203f6 aa0103f7 aa1e03e0 d503201f (7940e260)

Here, we add brd_check_and_reset_par func to check and limit max_part par.

--
V4->V5:(suggested by Ming Lei)
 - make sure max_part is not larger than DISK_MAX_PARTS

V3->V4:(suggested by Ming Lei)
 - remove useless change
 - add one limit of max_part

V2->V3: (suggested by Ming Lei)
 - clear .minors when running out of consecutive minor space in brd_alloc
 - remove limit of rd_nr

V1->V2:
 - add more checks in brd_check_par_valid as suggested by Ming Lei.

Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/block/brd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
index df8103dd40ac..6b9db3f63cb7 100644
--- a/drivers/block/brd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
@@ -389,11 +389,12 @@ static struct brd_device *brd_alloc(int i)
 	 *  is harmless)
 	 */
 	blk_queue_physical_block_size(brd->brd_queue, PAGE_SIZE);
-	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(max_part);
+	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(((i * max_part) & ~MINORMASK) ?
+			0 : max_part);
 	if (!disk)
 		goto out_free_queue;
 	disk->major		= RAMDISK_MAJOR;
-	disk->first_minor	= i * max_part;
+	disk->first_minor	= i * disk->minors;
 	disk->fops		= &brd_fops;
 	disk->private_data	= brd;
 	disk->queue		= brd->brd_queue;
@@ -468,6 +469,25 @@ static struct kobject *brd_probe(dev_t dev, int *part, void *data)
 	return kobj;
 }

+static inline void brd_check_and_reset_par(void)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!max_part))
+		max_part = 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * make sure 'max_part' can be divided exactly by (1U << MINORBITS),
+	 * otherwise, it is possiable to get same dev_t when adding partitions.
+	 */
+	if ((1U << MINORBITS) % max_part != 0)
+		max_part = 1UL << fls(max_part);
+
+	if (max_part > DISK_MAX_PARTS) {
+		pr_info("brd: max_part can't be larger than %d, reset max_part = %d.\n",
+			DISK_MAX_PARTS, DISK_MAX_PARTS);
+		max_part = DISK_MAX_PARTS;
+	}
+}
+
 static int __init brd_init(void)
 {
 	struct brd_device *brd, *next;
@@ -491,8 +511,7 @@ static int __init brd_init(void)
 	if (register_blkdev(RAMDISK_MAJOR, "ramdisk"))
 		return -EIO;

-	if (unlikely(!max_part))
-		max_part = 1;
+	brd_check_and_reset_par();

 	for (i = 0; i < rd_nr; i++) {
 		brd = brd_alloc(i);
-- 
2.19.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V5] brd: check and limit max_part par
  2020-02-04  2:44 [PATCH V5] brd: check and limit max_part par Zhiqiang Liu
@ 2020-02-04  8:52 ` Ming Lei
  2020-02-04 11:18   ` Zhiqiang Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2020-02-04  8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhiqiang Liu
  Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, Mingfangsen, wubo (T),
	Guiyao, Yanxiaodan

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:44:18AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
> 
> In brd_init func, rd_nr num of brd_device are firstly allocated
> and add in brd_devices, then brd_devices are traversed to add each
> brd_device by calling add_disk func. When allocating brd_device,
> the disk->first_minor is set to i * max_part, if rd_nr * max_part
> is larger than MINORMASK, two different brd_device may have the same
> devt, then only one of them can be successfully added.
> when rmmod brd.ko, it will cause oops when calling brd_exit.
> 
> Follow those steps:
>   # modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1048576
>   # rmmod brd
> then, the oops will appear.
> 
> Oops log:
> [  726.613722] Call trace:
> [  726.614175]  kernfs_find_ns+0x24/0x130
> [  726.614852]  kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x44/0x68
> [  726.615749]  sysfs_remove_group+0x38/0xb0
> [  726.616520]  blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x1c/0x28
> [  726.617320]  blk_unregister_queue+0x98/0x100
> [  726.618105]  del_gendisk+0x144/0x2b8
> [  726.618759]  brd_exit+0x68/0x560 [brd]
> [  726.619501]  __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x19c/0x2a0
> [  726.620384]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
> [  726.621057]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
> [  726.621738]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> [  726.622259] Code: aa0203f6 aa0103f7 aa1e03e0 d503201f (7940e260)
> 
> Here, we add brd_check_and_reset_par func to check and limit max_part par.
> 
> --
> V4->V5:(suggested by Ming Lei)
>  - make sure max_part is not larger than DISK_MAX_PARTS
> 
> V3->V4:(suggested by Ming Lei)
>  - remove useless change
>  - add one limit of max_part
> 
> V2->V3: (suggested by Ming Lei)
>  - clear .minors when running out of consecutive minor space in brd_alloc
>  - remove limit of rd_nr
> 
> V1->V2:
>  - add more checks in brd_check_par_valid as suggested by Ming Lei.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/brd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
> index df8103dd40ac..6b9db3f63cb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/brd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
> @@ -389,11 +389,12 @@ static struct brd_device *brd_alloc(int i)
>  	 *  is harmless)
>  	 */
>  	blk_queue_physical_block_size(brd->brd_queue, PAGE_SIZE);
> -	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(max_part);
> +	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(((i * max_part) & ~MINORMASK) ?
> +			0 : max_part);
>  	if (!disk)
>  		goto out_free_queue;
>  	disk->major		= RAMDISK_MAJOR;
> -	disk->first_minor	= i * max_part;
> +	disk->first_minor	= i * disk->minors;

As I told you, the above change isn't needed, otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>


Thanks, 
Ming


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V5] brd: check and limit max_part par
  2020-02-04  8:52 ` Ming Lei
@ 2020-02-04 11:18   ` Zhiqiang Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhiqiang Liu @ 2020-02-04 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ming Lei
  Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, Mingfangsen, wubo (T),
	Guiyao, Yanxiaodan



On 2020/2/4 16:52, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 10:44:18AM +0800, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
>>
>> In brd_init func, rd_nr num of brd_device are firstly allocated
>> and add in brd_devices, then brd_devices are traversed to add each
>> brd_device by calling add_disk func. When allocating brd_device,
>> the disk->first_minor is set to i * max_part, if rd_nr * max_part
>> is larger than MINORMASK, two different brd_device may have the same
>> devt, then only one of them can be successfully added.
>> when rmmod brd.ko, it will cause oops when calling brd_exit.
>>
>> Follow those steps:
>>   # modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1048576
>>   # rmmod brd
>> then, the oops will appear.
>>
>> Oops log:
>> [  726.613722] Call trace:
>> [  726.614175]  kernfs_find_ns+0x24/0x130
>> [  726.614852]  kernfs_find_and_get_ns+0x44/0x68
>> [  726.615749]  sysfs_remove_group+0x38/0xb0
>> [  726.616520]  blk_trace_remove_sysfs+0x1c/0x28
>> [  726.617320]  blk_unregister_queue+0x98/0x100
>> [  726.618105]  del_gendisk+0x144/0x2b8
>> [  726.618759]  brd_exit+0x68/0x560 [brd]
>> [  726.619501]  __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x19c/0x2a0
>> [  726.620384]  el0_svc_common+0x78/0x130
>> [  726.621057]  el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
>> [  726.621738]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
>> [  726.622259] Code: aa0203f6 aa0103f7 aa1e03e0 d503201f (7940e260)
>>
>> Here, we add brd_check_and_reset_par func to check and limit max_part par.
>>
>> --
>> V4->V5:(suggested by Ming Lei)
>>  - make sure max_part is not larger than DISK_MAX_PARTS
>>
>> V3->V4:(suggested by Ming Lei)
>>  - remove useless change
>>  - add one limit of max_part
>>
>> V2->V3: (suggested by Ming Lei)
>>  - clear .minors when running out of consecutive minor space in brd_alloc
>>  - remove limit of rd_nr
>>
>> V1->V2:
>>  - add more checks in brd_check_par_valid as suggested by Ming Lei.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/brd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
>> index df8103dd40ac..6b9db3f63cb7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/brd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
>> @@ -389,11 +389,12 @@ static struct brd_device *brd_alloc(int i)
>>  	 *  is harmless)
>>  	 */
>>  	blk_queue_physical_block_size(brd->brd_queue, PAGE_SIZE);
>> -	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(max_part);
>> +	disk = brd->brd_disk = alloc_disk(((i * max_part) & ~MINORMASK) ?
>> +			0 : max_part);
>>  	if (!disk)
>>  		goto out_free_queue;
>>  	disk->major		= RAMDISK_MAJOR;
>> -	disk->first_minor	= i * max_part;
>> +	disk->first_minor	= i * disk->minors;
> 
> As I told you, the above change isn't needed, otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Sorry for missing that. I will remove these in v6 patch.
Thanks for your patience.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-04 11:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-04  2:44 [PATCH V5] brd: check and limit max_part par Zhiqiang Liu
2020-02-04  8:52 ` Ming Lei
2020-02-04 11:18   ` Zhiqiang Liu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.