* is per patch checkpatch reports working?
@ 2018-10-19 7:42 Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-19 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-10-19 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon, Qian Xu; +Cc: dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report
I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
Thanks,
ferruh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working?
2018-10-19 7:42 is per patch checkpatch reports working? Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-10-19 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:38 ` Liang, Ma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-10-19 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report
19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
I have just restarted it.
For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
the new check in checkpatches.sh.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working?
2018-10-19 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-10-19 10:38 ` Liang, Ma
2018-10-19 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Ma @ 2018-10-19 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report
Hi Thomas,
I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
that script still put '+' as the Section name.
any suggestion ?
I use fedora 24 and gawk
Regards
Liang
On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
>
> Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
>
> I have just restarted it.
>
> For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> the new check in checkpatches.sh.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working?
2018-10-19 10:38 ` Liang, Ma
@ 2018-10-19 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:45 ` Liang, Ma
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-10-19 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang, Ma; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report
You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script.
19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma:
> Hi Thomas,
> I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
> that script still put '+' as the Section name.
> any suggestion ?
> I use fedora 24 and gawk
> Regards
> Liang
>
> On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> >
> > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> >
> > I have just restarted it.
> >
> > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> > the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> >
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working?
2018-10-19 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-10-19 10:45 ` Liang, Ma
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Ma @ 2018-10-19 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report
I did send out a patch to the author for a while. but no response.
FYI http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/46101/
Liang
On 19 Oct 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script.
>
> 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma:
> > Hi Thomas,
> > I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
> > that script still put '+' as the Section name.
> > any suggestion ?
> > I use fedora 24 and gawk
> > Regards
> > Liang
> >
> > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> > >
> > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> > >
> > > I have just restarted it.
> > >
> > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> > > the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-19 10:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-19 7:42 is per patch checkpatch reports working? Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-19 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:38 ` Liang, Ma
2018-10-19 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:45 ` Liang, Ma
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.