All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V \(KVM/riscv\)"
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
	"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 \(KVM/arm64\)"
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:50:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41f1f405-fa2b-0022-c4ba-58a8d0ff3bad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4665c87b-4983-7e15-9262-290d2969b10f@redhat.com>

On 6/22/22 18:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Even better, drop_large_spte() is always called right before 
> kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(), so:

Actually, we can even include the call from eager page splitting if
__link_shadow_page() is the one that takes care of dropping the large
SPTE:

 From bea344e409bb8329ca69aca0a63f97537a7ec798 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:11:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: pull call to drop_large_spte() into
  __link_shadow_page()

Before allocating a child shadow page table, all callers check
whether the parent already points to a huge page and, if so, they
drop that SPTE.  This is done by drop_large_spte().

However, the act that requires dropping the large SPTE is the
installation of the sp that is returned by kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(),
which happens in __link_shadow_page().  Move the call there
instead of having it in each and every caller.

To ensure that the shadow page is not linked twice if it was
present, do _not_ opportunistically make kvm_mmu_get_child_sp()
idempotent: instead, return an error value if the shadow page
already existed.  This is a bit more verbose, but clearer than
NULL.

Now that the drop_large_spte() name is not taken anymore,
remove the two underscores in front of __drop_large_spte().

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 36bc49f08d60..64c1191be4ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1135,26 +1135,16 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
  		rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
  }
  
-
-static bool __drop_large_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
+static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
  {
-	if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
-		WARN_ON(sptep_to_sp(sptep)->role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K);
-		drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
  
-static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
-{
-	if (__drop_large_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep)) {
-		struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+	sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+	WARN_ON(sp->role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K);
  
-		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn,
+	drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
+	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, sp->gfn,
  			KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
-	}
  }
  
  /*
@@ -2221,6 +2211,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  {
  	union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
  
+	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
+
  	role = kvm_mmu_child_role(sptep, direct, access);
  	return kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
  }
@@ -2295,6 +2288,13 @@ static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
  
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK != PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
  
+	/*
+	 * If an SPTE is present already, it must be a leaf and therefore
+	 * a large one.  Drop it and flush the TLB before installing sp.
+	 */
+	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)
+		drop_large_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
+
  	spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, sp_ad_disabled(sp));
  
  	mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
@@ -3080,11 +3080,9 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
  		if (it.level == fault->goal_level)
  			break;
  
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
-		if (is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep))
-			continue;
-
  		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn, true, ACC_ALL);
+		if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
+			continue;
  
  		link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
  		if (fault->is_tdp && fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 24f292f3f93f..2448fa8d8438 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -648,15 +648,13 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  		gfn_t table_gfn;
  
  		clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
  
-		sp = NULL;
-		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
-			table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
-			access = gw->pt_access[it.level - 2];
-			sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
-						  false, access);
+		table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
+		access = gw->pt_access[it.level - 2];
+		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
+					  false, access);
  
+		if (sp != ERR_PTR(-EEXIST)) {
  			/*
  			 * We must synchronize the pagetable before linking it
  			 * because the guest doesn't need to flush tlb when
@@ -685,7 +683,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  		if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))
  			goto out_gpte_changed;
  
-		if (sp)
+		if (sp != ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
  			link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
  	}
  
@@ -709,16 +707,15 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  
  		validate_direct_spte(vcpu, it.sptep, direct_access);
  
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
+		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn,
+					  true, direct_access);
+		if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
+			continue;
  
-		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
-			sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn,
-						  true, direct_access);
-			link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
-			if (fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
-			    fault->req_level >= it.level)
-				account_huge_nx_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
-		}
+		link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
+		if (fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
+		    fault->req_level >= it.level)
+			account_huge_nx_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
  	}
  
  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(it.level != fault->goal_level))


I'll test the resulting series and then send a v7.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
	"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)" 
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)" 
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:50:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41f1f405-fa2b-0022-c4ba-58a8d0ff3bad@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4665c87b-4983-7e15-9262-290d2969b10f@redhat.com>

On 6/22/22 18:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Even better, drop_large_spte() is always called right before 
> kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(), so:

Actually, we can even include the call from eager page splitting if
__link_shadow_page() is the one that takes care of dropping the large
SPTE:

 From bea344e409bb8329ca69aca0a63f97537a7ec798 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:11:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: pull call to drop_large_spte() into
  __link_shadow_page()

Before allocating a child shadow page table, all callers check
whether the parent already points to a huge page and, if so, they
drop that SPTE.  This is done by drop_large_spte().

However, the act that requires dropping the large SPTE is the
installation of the sp that is returned by kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(),
which happens in __link_shadow_page().  Move the call there
instead of having it in each and every caller.

To ensure that the shadow page is not linked twice if it was
present, do _not_ opportunistically make kvm_mmu_get_child_sp()
idempotent: instead, return an error value if the shadow page
already existed.  This is a bit more verbose, but clearer than
NULL.

Now that the drop_large_spte() name is not taken anymore,
remove the two underscores in front of __drop_large_spte().

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 36bc49f08d60..64c1191be4ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1135,26 +1135,16 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
  		rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
  }
  
-
-static bool __drop_large_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
+static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
  {
-	if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
-		WARN_ON(sptep_to_sp(sptep)->role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K);
-		drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
+	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
  
-static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
-{
-	if (__drop_large_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep)) {
-		struct kvm_mmu_page *sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+	sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
+	WARN_ON(sp->role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K);
  
-		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn,
+	drop_spte(kvm, sptep);
+	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, sp->gfn,
  			KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
-	}
  }
  
  /*
@@ -2221,6 +2211,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  {
  	union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
  
+	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
+
  	role = kvm_mmu_child_role(sptep, direct, access);
  	return kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
  }
@@ -2295,6 +2288,13 @@ static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
  
  	BUILD_BUG_ON(VMX_EPT_WRITABLE_MASK != PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
  
+	/*
+	 * If an SPTE is present already, it must be a leaf and therefore
+	 * a large one.  Drop it and flush the TLB before installing sp.
+	 */
+	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)
+		drop_large_spte(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
+
  	spte = make_nonleaf_spte(sp->spt, sp_ad_disabled(sp));
  
  	mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
@@ -3080,11 +3080,9 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
  		if (it.level == fault->goal_level)
  			break;
  
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
-		if (is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep))
-			continue;
-
  		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn, true, ACC_ALL);
+		if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
+			continue;
  
  		link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
  		if (fault->is_tdp && fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 24f292f3f93f..2448fa8d8438 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -648,15 +648,13 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  		gfn_t table_gfn;
  
  		clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
  
-		sp = NULL;
-		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
-			table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
-			access = gw->pt_access[it.level - 2];
-			sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
-						  false, access);
+		table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
+		access = gw->pt_access[it.level - 2];
+		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
+					  false, access);
  
+		if (sp != ERR_PTR(-EEXIST)) {
  			/*
  			 * We must synchronize the pagetable before linking it
  			 * because the guest doesn't need to flush tlb when
@@ -685,7 +683,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  		if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))
  			goto out_gpte_changed;
  
-		if (sp)
+		if (sp != ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
  			link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
  	}
  
@@ -709,16 +707,15 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
  
  		validate_direct_spte(vcpu, it.sptep, direct_access);
  
-		drop_large_spte(vcpu, it.sptep);
+		sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn,
+					  true, direct_access);
+		if (sp == ERR_PTR(-EEXIST))
+			continue;
  
-		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
-			sp = kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(vcpu, it.sptep, base_gfn,
-						  true, direct_access);
-			link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
-			if (fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
-			    fault->req_level >= it.level)
-				account_huge_nx_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
-		}
+		link_shadow_page(vcpu, it.sptep, sp);
+		if (fault->huge_page_disallowed &&
+		    fault->req_level >= it.level)
+			account_huge_nx_page(vcpu->kvm, sp);
  	}
  
  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(it.level != fault->goal_level))


I'll test the resulting series and then send a v7.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-16 23:21 [PATCH v6 00/22] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Stop passing @direct to mmu_alloc_root() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-16 18:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-16 18:47     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:06       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:19       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:19         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17  1:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17  1:19     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Always pass 0 for @quadrant when gptes are 8 bytes David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:06     ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:06       ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:27       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:27         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 12/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow NULL @vcpu in kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:28   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:28     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 14:26     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 14:26       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 15:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 15:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 16:39     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 16:40     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 17/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:53   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 16:53     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 16:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 16:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs in shadow MMU at all possible levels David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 17:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:24     ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:24       ` David Matlack
2022-06-21 17:59       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-21 17:59         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 17:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-22 16:13     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 16:13       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-22 16:50       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-06-22 16:50         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 21/22] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-05-19 15:33   ` Anup Patel
2022-05-19 15:33     ` Anup Patel
2022-05-20 23:21   ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 17:37     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 17:37       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-23 17:44       ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 17:44         ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 18:13         ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 18:13           ` Mingwei Zhang
2022-05-23 18:22           ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 18:22             ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 23:53             ` David Matlack
2022-05-23 23:53               ` David Matlack
2022-06-17 17:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 17:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 18:34     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 18:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-16 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:21   ` David Matlack
2022-06-01 21:50   ` Ricardo Koller
2022-06-01 21:50     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-06-17 19:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-17 19:08     ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41f1f405-fa2b-0022-c4ba-58a8d0ff3bad@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.