[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
checking for section mismatches:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2410_plls_add() to the function .init.text:s3c_plltab_register()
The function s3c2410_plls_add() references
the function __init s3c_plltab_register().
This is often because s3c2410_plls_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of s3c_plltab_register is wrong.

This removes the __init annotation from s3c2410_plls_add as well as the
__initdata section annotations from s3c2440_plls_12 and s3c2440_plls_169344,
which in turn are referenced from s3c2410_plls_add.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
----
It would be nice to get this merged through the cpufreq tree. Most likely
this has never caused problems because the device notifiers in practice
only get called at boot time, so I assume it's enough to have this fixed
in 4.4 or 4.5 but not backported.

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
index a19460e6e7b0..b355fca6cc2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include <plat/cpu.h>
 #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
 
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] __initdata = {
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] = {
 	{ .frequency = 75000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x75, 3, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 600.000000 */
 	{ .frequency = 80000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x98, 4, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 640.000000 */
 	{ .frequency = 90000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x70, 2, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 720.000000 */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
index 1191b2905625..be9a248b5ce9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include <plat/cpu.h>
 #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
 
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] __initdata = {
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] = {
 	{ .frequency = 78019200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(121, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 624.153600 */
 	{ .frequency = 84067200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(131, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 672.537600 */
 	{ .frequency = 90115200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(141, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 720.921600 */
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
index 733aa5153e74..68ef8fd9482f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ late_initcall(s3c_cpufreq_initcall);
  *
  * Register the given set of PLLs with the system.
  */
-int __init s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
+int s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
 			       unsigned int plls_no)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *vals;

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
checking for section mismatches:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2410_plls_add() to the function .init.text:s3c_plltab_register()
The function s3c2410_plls_add() references
the function __init s3c_plltab_register().
This is often because s3c2410_plls_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of s3c_plltab_register is wrong.

This removes the __init annotation from s3c2410_plls_add as well as the
__initdata section annotations from s3c2440_plls_12 and s3c2440_plls_169344,
which in turn are referenced from s3c2410_plls_add.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
----
It would be nice to get this merged through the cpufreq tree. Most likely
this has never caused problems because the device notifiers in practice
only get called at boot time, so I assume it's enough to have this fixed
in 4.4 or 4.5 but not backported.

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
index a19460e6e7b0..b355fca6cc2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include <plat/cpu.h>
 #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
 
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] __initdata = {
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] = {
 	{ .frequency = 75000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x75, 3, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 600.000000 */
 	{ .frequency = 80000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x98, 4, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 640.000000 */
 	{ .frequency = 90000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x70, 2, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 720.000000 */
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
index 1191b2905625..be9a248b5ce9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include <plat/cpu.h>
 #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
 
-static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] __initdata = {
+static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] = {
 	{ .frequency = 78019200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(121, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 624.153600 */
 	{ .frequency = 84067200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(131, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 672.537600 */
 	{ .frequency = 90115200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(141, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 720.921600 */
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
index 733aa5153e74..68ef8fd9482f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ late_initcall(s3c_cpufreq_initcall);
  *
  * Register the given set of PLLs with the system.
  */
-int __init s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
+int s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
 			       unsigned int plls_no)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *vals;

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> it up (at least for the time being).

Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?

	Arnd

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> it up (at least for the time being).

Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:26:43 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
> is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
> which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
> checking for section mismatches:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2410_plls_add() to the function .init.text:s3c_plltab_register()
> The function s3c2410_plls_add() references
> the function __init s3c_plltab_register().
> This is often because s3c2410_plls_add lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of s3c_plltab_register is wrong.
> 
> This removes the __init annotation from s3c2410_plls_add as well as the
> __initdata section annotations from s3c2440_plls_12 and s3c2440_plls_169344,
> which in turn are referenced from s3c2410_plls_add.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ----
> It would be nice to get this merged through the cpufreq tree. Most likely
> this has never caused problems because the device notifiers in practice
> only get called at boot time, so I assume it's enough to have this fixed
> in 4.4 or 4.5 but not backported.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> index a19460e6e7b0..b355fca6cc2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
>  #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
>  
> -static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] __initdata = {
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] = {
>  	{ .frequency = 75000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x75, 3, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 600.000000 */
>  	{ .frequency = 80000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x98, 4, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 640.000000 */
>  	{ .frequency = 90000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x70, 2, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 720.000000 */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> index 1191b2905625..be9a248b5ce9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
>  #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
>  
> -static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] __initdata = {
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] = {
>  	{ .frequency = 78019200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(121, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 624.153600 */
>  	{ .frequency = 84067200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(131, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 672.537600 */
>  	{ .frequency = 90115200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(141, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 720.921600 */
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> index 733aa5153e74..68ef8fd9482f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ late_initcall(s3c_cpufreq_initcall);
>   *
>   * Register the given set of PLLs with the system.
>   */
> -int __init s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
> +int s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
>  			       unsigned int plls_no)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *vals;
> 

This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
it up (at least for the time being).

Thanks,
Rafael

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday, November 16, 2015 10:26:43 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c2410_plls_add is a device notifier that may be called at runtime and
> is correctly not marked __init. However it calls s3c_plltab_register()
> which is marked __init, and that triggers a build error when we are
> checking for section mismatches:
> 
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x195e0): Section mismatch in reference from the function s3c2410_plls_add() to the function .init.text:s3c_plltab_register()
> The function s3c2410_plls_add() references
> the function __init s3c_plltab_register().
> This is often because s3c2410_plls_add lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of s3c_plltab_register is wrong.
> 
> This removes the __init annotation from s3c2410_plls_add as well as the
> __initdata section annotations from s3c2440_plls_12 and s3c2440_plls_169344,
> which in turn are referenced from s3c2410_plls_add.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ----
> It would be nice to get this merged through the cpufreq tree. Most likely
> this has never caused problems because the device notifiers in practice
> only get called at boot time, so I assume it's enough to have this fixed
> in 4.4 or 4.5 but not backported.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> index a19460e6e7b0..b355fca6cc2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
>  #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
>  
> -static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] __initdata = {
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] = {
>  	{ .frequency = 75000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x75, 3, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 600.000000 */
>  	{ .frequency = 80000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x98, 4, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 640.000000 */
>  	{ .frequency = 90000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x70, 2, 3),  }, 	/* FVco 720.000000 */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> index 1191b2905625..be9a248b5ce9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
>  #include <plat/cpu-freq-core.h>
>  
> -static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] __initdata = {
> +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] = {
>  	{ .frequency = 78019200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(121, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 624.153600 */
>  	{ .frequency = 84067200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(131, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 672.537600 */
>  	{ .frequency = 90115200,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(141, 5, 3), 	}, 	/* FVco 720.921600 */
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> index 733aa5153e74..68ef8fd9482f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c24xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ late_initcall(s3c_cpufreq_initcall);
>   *
>   * Register the given set of PLLs with the system.
>   */
> -int __init s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
> +int s3c_plltab_register(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *plls,
>  			       unsigned int plls_no)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *vals;
> 

This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
it up (at least for the time being).

Thanks,
Rafael

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 420 bytes --]

On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
>> it up (at least for the time being).
> 
> Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?

Sure.

As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
(as in attachment).

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[-- Attachment #2: init_data.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3760 bytes --]

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2410.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2410.c
index 5e37d368594b..d9fd5319379b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2410.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2410.c
@@ -65,12 +65,12 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table pll_vals_12MHz[] = {
     { .frequency = 270000000, .driver_data = PLLVAL(127, 1, 1),  },
 };
 
-static int s3c2410_plls_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
+static int __init s3c2410_plls_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 {
 	return s3c_plltab_register(pll_vals_12MHz, ARRAY_SIZE(pll_vals_12MHz));
 }
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2410_plls_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2410_plls_interface __initdata = {
 	.name		= "s3c2410_plls",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2410_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2410_plls_add,
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int __init s3c2410_pll_init(void)
 }
 arch_initcall(s3c2410_pll_init);
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2410a_plls_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2410a_plls_interface __initdata = {
 	.name		= "s3c2410a_plls",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2410a_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2410_plls_add,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
index a19460e6e7b0..01958230cf2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-12000000.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_12[] __initdata = {
 	{ .frequency = 400000000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(0x5c, 1, 1),  }, 	/* FVco 800.000000 */
 };
 
-static int s3c2440_plls12_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
+static int __init s3c2440_plls12_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 {
 	struct clk *xtal_clk;
 	unsigned long xtal;
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int s3c2440_plls12_add(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2440_plls12_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2440_plls12_interface __initdata = {
 	.name		= "s3c2440_plls12",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2440_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2440_plls12_add,
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int __init s3c2440_pll_12mhz(void)
 }
 arch_initcall(s3c2440_pll_12mhz);
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls12_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls12_interface __initdata = {
 	.name		= "s3c2442_plls12",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2442_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2440_plls12_add,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
index 1191b2905625..db9f476ab581 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pll-s3c2440-16934400.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c2440_plls_169344[] __initdata = {
 	{ .frequency = 402192000,	.driver_data = PLLVAL(87, 2, 1), 	}, 	/* FVco 804.384000 */
 };
 
-static int s3c2440_plls169344_add(struct device *dev,
+static int __init s3c2440_plls169344_add(struct device *dev,
 				  struct subsys_interface *sif)
 {
 	struct clk *xtal_clk;
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int s3c2440_plls169344_add(struct device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2440_plls169344_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2440_plls169344_interface __initdata  = {
 	.name		= "s3c2440_plls169344",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2440_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2440_plls169344_add,
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int __init s3c2440_pll_16934400(void)
 }
 arch_initcall(s3c2440_pll_16934400);
 
-static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface = {
+static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
 	.name		= "s3c2442_plls169344",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2442_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2440_plls169344_add,

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
>> it up (at least for the time being).
> 
> Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?

Sure.

As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
(as in attachment).

Best regards,
Krzysztof



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: init_data.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3760 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151117/3cab94a0/attachment.bin>

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> >> it up (at least for the time being).
> > 
> > Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
> 
> Sure.
> 
> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
> (as in attachment).
> 

I don't think so:

static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
        .name           = "s3c2442_plls169344",
        .subsys         = &s3c2442_subsys,
        .add_dev        = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
};

This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
have a broken list.

	Arnd

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> >> it up (at least for the time being).
> > 
> > Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
> 
> Sure.
> 
> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
> (as in attachment).
> 

I don't think so:

static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
        .name           = "s3c2442_plls169344",
        .subsys         = &s3c2442_subsys,
        .add_dev        = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
};

This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
have a broken list.

	Arnd

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17.11.2015 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
>>>> it up (at least for the time being).
>>>
>>> Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
>> (as in attachment).
>>
> 
> I don't think so:
> 
> static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
>         .name           = "s3c2442_plls169344",
>         .subsys         = &s3c2442_subsys,
>         .add_dev        = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
> };
> 
> This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
> in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
> s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
> at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
> have a broken list.

Ah, yes, so the patch is fine:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17.11.2015 18:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
>>>> it up (at least for the time being).
>>>
>>> Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
>> (as in attachment).
>>
> 
> I don't think so:
> 
> static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
>         .name           = "s3c2442_plls169344",
>         .subsys         = &s3c2442_subsys,
>         .add_dev        = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
> };
> 
> This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
> in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
> s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
> at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
> have a broken list.

Ah, yes, so the patch is fine:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof