Re: [KJ] de-initialization of = 0 globals

[Jaco Kroon <jaco@kroon.co.za>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]

>>The simpler start is probably to generate one large patch for the Kernel
>>and separate patches for larger subsystems (IDE, SCSI, etc.) out of it
>>since you can just work with an editor.
>>And near the end you can send the last ones in one patch and see what
>>happens (in the best of all worlds, the patch is accept for -mm which
>>usually creates directly enough pressure so that subsystem maintainers
>>take it from there).
>>
>>Or you just send the one large patch and see what happens.
> 
> Another way into the kernel for patches like this is via the Trivial
> Patch Monkey (aka Adrian Bunk) - trivial@rustcorp.com.au
> 
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/trivial/
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/7/159

I guess that would be the way to go then.  Send one huge patch off to
trivial at rustcorp.

Should I cc LKLM and KJ?

-- 
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world,
  those that understand binary and those that don't.
http://www.kroon.co.za/

[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3166 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors