All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
@ 2016-12-05 11:06 swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 1/4] drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces swati.dhingra
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: swati.dhingra @ 2016-12-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Swati Dhingra, dri-devel

From: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>

Currently, we don't have a stable ABI which can be used for the purpose of
providing output debug/loggging/crc and other such data from DRM.
The ABI in current use (filesystems, ioctls, et al.) have their own
constraints and are intended to output a particular type of data.
Few cases in point:
sysfs	- stable ABI, but constrained to one textual value per file
debugfs	- unstable ABI, free-for-all
ioctls	- not as suitable to many single purpose continuous data
	  dumping, we would very quickly run out ioctl space; requires more
	  userspace support than "cat"
device nodes -  a real possibilty, kernel instantiation is more tricky,
		requires udev (+udev.rules) or userspace discovery of the
		dynamic major:minor (via sysfs) [mounting a registered
		filesystem is easy in comparison]
netlink	- stream based, therefore involves numerous copies.

Debugfs is the lesser among the evils here, thereby we have grown used to the
convenience and flexibility in presentation that debugfs gives us
(including relayfs inodes) that we want some of that hierachy in stable user
ABI form.

Due to these limitations, there is a need for a new pseudo filesytem, that
would act as a stable 'free-for-all' ABI, with the heirarchial structure and
thus convenience of debugfs. This will be managed by drm, thus named 'drmfs'.
DRM would register this filesystem to manage a canonical mountpoint, but this
wouldn't limit everyone to only using that pseudofs underneath.

This can serve to hold various kinds of output data from Linux DRM subsystems,
for the files which can't truely fit anywhere else with existing ABI's but
present so, for the lack of a better place.

In this patch series, we have introduced a pseudo filesystem named as 'drmfs'
for now. The filesystem is introduced in the first patch, and the subsequent
patches make use of the filesystem interfaces, in drm driver, and making them
available for use by the drm subsystem components, one of which is i915.
We've moved the location of i915 GuC logs from debugfs to drmfs in the last
patch. Subsequently, more such files such as pipe_crc, error states, memory
stats, etc. can be move to this filesystem, if the idea introduced here is
acceptable per se. The filesystem introduced is being used to house the data
generated by i915 driver in this patch series, but will hopefully be generic
enough to provide scope for usage by any other drm subsystem component.

The patch series is being floated as RFC to gather feedback on the idea and
infrastructure proposed here and it's suitability to address the specific
problem statement/use case.

TODO: Create documentation. Will do so in next version.

v2: fix the bat failures caused due to missing config check

v3: Changes made:
    - Move the location of drmfs from fs/ to drivers/gpu/drm/ (Chris)
    - Moving config checks to header (Chris,Daniel)


Sourab Gupta (4):
  drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
  drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
  drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
  drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs

 drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig                    |   9 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile                   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c                  |  12 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c                    | 555 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  33 +-
 include/drm/drm_drv.h                      |   3 +
 include/drm/drmfs.h                        |  77 ++++
 include/uapi/linux/magic.h                 |   3 +
 8 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
 create mode 100644 include/drm/drmfs.h

-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [RFC 1/4] drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
@ 2016-12-05 11:06 ` swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 2/4] drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init swati.dhingra
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: swati.dhingra @ 2016-12-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Swati Dhingra, dri-devel, Sourab Gupta

From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>

The patch introduces a new pseudo filesystem type, named 'drmfs' which is
intended to house the files for the data generated by drm subsystem that
cannot be accommodated by any of the existing filesystems.
The filesystem is modelled on the lines of existing pseudo-filesystems such
as debugfs/tracefs, and borrows ideas from their implementation.
This filesystem will be appearing at sys/kernel/drm.

A new config 'CONFIG_DRMFS' is introduced to enable/disable the filesystem,
which is dependent on CONFIG_DRM.
The filesystem will not be registered standalone during kernel init time,
instead it is intended to be initialized/registered during drm initialization.

The intent for introduction of the filesystem is to act as a location to hold
various kinds of data output from Linux DRM subsystems, which can't really fit
anywhere else into the existing filesystems such as debugfs/sysfs etc. All these
filesystems have their own constraints and are intended to output a particular
type of data such as attributes and small debug parameter data. Due to these
constraints, there is a need for a new pseudo filesytem, customizable to DRM
specific requirements and catering to the needs to DRM subsystem components

Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig    |   9 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile   |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c    | 555 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/drm/drmfs.h        |  77 +++++++
 include/uapi/linux/magic.h |   3 +
 5 files changed, 645 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
 create mode 100644 include/drm/drmfs.h

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
index 95fc041..5082840 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
@@ -26,6 +26,15 @@ config DRM_MIPI_DSI
 	bool
 	depends on DRM
 
+config DRMFS
+	bool "Drmfs file system support"
+	depends on DRM
+	help
+	  Drmfs is a pseudo file system for drm subsystem output data.
+
+	  drmfs is a filesystem which serves as a stable ABI to hold
+	  miscellaneous output data from drm subsystems.
+
 config DRM_DP_AUX_CHARDEV
 	bool "DRM DP AUX Interface"
 	depends on DRM
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
index 883f3e7..5021225 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ CFLAGS_drm_trace_points.o := -I$(src)
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_DRM)	+= drm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_MIPI_DSI) += drm_mipi_dsi.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DRMFS)	+= drmfs.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ARM)	+= arm/
 obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_TTM)	+= ttm/
 obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_TDFX)	+= tdfx/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bdb0e7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
+ * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *	Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
+ *	Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
+ *	Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * drmfs is the filesystem used for output of drm subsystem data
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/mount.h>
+#include <linux/kobject.h>
+#include <linux/namei.h>
+#include <drm/drmfs.h>
+#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/parser.h>
+#include <linux/magic.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define DRMFS_DEFAULT_MODE	0700
+
+static struct vfsmount *drmfs_mount;
+static int drmfs_mount_count;
+static bool drmfs_registered;
+
+static ssize_t default_read_file(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
+				size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t default_write_file(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
+				size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	return count;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations drmfs_default_file_operations = {
+	.read =		default_read_file,
+	.write =	default_write_file,
+	.open =		simple_open,
+	.llseek =	noop_llseek,
+};
+
+static struct inode *drmfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct inode *inode = new_inode(sb);
+
+	if (inode) {
+		inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
+		inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
+	}
+	return inode;
+}
+
+struct drmfs_mount_opts {
+	kuid_t uid;
+	kgid_t gid;
+	umode_t mode;
+};
+
+enum {
+	Opt_uid,
+	Opt_gid,
+	Opt_mode,
+	Opt_err
+};
+
+static const match_table_t tokens = {
+	{Opt_uid, "uid=%u"},
+	{Opt_gid, "gid=%u"},
+	{Opt_mode, "mode=%o"},
+	{Opt_err, NULL}
+};
+
+struct drmfs_fs_info {
+	struct drmfs_mount_opts mount_opts;
+};
+
+static int drmfs_parse_options(char *data, struct drmfs_mount_opts *opts)
+{
+	substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
+	int option;
+	int token;
+	kuid_t uid;
+	kgid_t gid;
+	char *p;
+
+	opts->mode = DRMFS_DEFAULT_MODE;
+
+	while ((p = strsep(&data, ",")) != NULL) {
+		if (!*p)
+			continue;
+
+		token = match_token(p, tokens, args);
+		switch (token) {
+		case Opt_uid:
+			if (match_int(&args[0], &option))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), option);
+			if (!uid_valid(uid))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			opts->uid = uid;
+			break;
+		case Opt_gid:
+			if (match_int(&args[0], &option))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), option);
+			if (!gid_valid(gid))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			opts->gid = gid;
+			break;
+		case Opt_mode:
+			if (match_octal(&args[0], &option))
+				return -EINVAL;
+			opts->mode = option & S_IALLUGO;
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * We might like to report bad mount options here
+		 */
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int drmfs_apply_options(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct drmfs_fs_info *fsi = sb->s_fs_info;
+	struct inode *inode = sb->s_root->d_inode;
+	struct drmfs_mount_opts *opts = &fsi->mount_opts;
+
+	inode->i_mode &= ~S_IALLUGO;
+	inode->i_mode |= opts->mode;
+
+	inode->i_uid = opts->uid;
+	inode->i_gid = opts->gid;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int drmfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
+{
+	int err;
+	struct drmfs_fs_info *fsi = sb->s_fs_info;
+
+	sync_filesystem(sb);
+	err = drmfs_parse_options(data, &fsi->mount_opts);
+	if (err)
+		goto fail;
+
+	drmfs_apply_options(sb);
+
+fail:
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int drmfs_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
+{
+	struct drmfs_fs_info *fsi = root->d_sb->s_fs_info;
+	struct drmfs_mount_opts *opts = &fsi->mount_opts;
+
+	if (!uid_eq(opts->uid, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID))
+		seq_printf(m, ",uid=%u",
+			   from_kuid_munged(&init_user_ns, opts->uid));
+	if (!gid_eq(opts->gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID))
+		seq_printf(m, ",gid=%u",
+			   from_kgid_munged(&init_user_ns, opts->gid));
+	if (opts->mode != DRMFS_DEFAULT_MODE)
+		seq_printf(m, ",mode=%o", opts->mode);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct super_operations drmfs_super_operations = {
+	.statfs		= simple_statfs,
+	.remount_fs	= drmfs_remount,
+	.show_options	= drmfs_show_options,
+};
+
+static int drm_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
+{
+	static struct tree_descr drm_files[] = { {""} };
+	struct drmfs_fs_info *fsi;
+	int err;
+
+	save_mount_options(sb, data);
+
+	fsi = kzalloc(sizeof(struct drmfs_fs_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	sb->s_fs_info = fsi;
+	if (!fsi) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	err = drmfs_parse_options(data, &fsi->mount_opts);
+	if (err)
+		goto fail;
+
+	err  =  simple_fill_super(sb, DRMFS_MAGIC, drm_files);
+	if (err)
+		goto fail;
+
+	sb->s_op = &drmfs_super_operations;
+
+	drmfs_apply_options(sb);
+
+	return 0;
+
+fail:
+	kfree(fsi);
+	sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
+	return err;
+}
+
+static struct dentry *drm_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
+			int flags, const char *dev_name,
+			void *data)
+{
+	return mount_single(fs_type, flags, data, drm_fill_super);
+}
+
+static struct file_system_type drm_fs_type = {
+	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
+	.name =		"drmfs",
+	.mount =	drm_mount,
+	.kill_sb =	kill_litter_super,
+};
+MODULE_ALIAS_FS("drmfs");
+
+static struct dentry *start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
+{
+	struct dentry *dentry;
+	int error;
+
+	pr_debug("drmfs: creating file '%s'\n", name);
+
+	error = simple_pin_fs(&drm_fs_type, &drmfs_mount,
+			      &drmfs_mount_count);
+	if (error)
+		return ERR_PTR(error);
+
+	/* If the parent is not specified, we create it in the root.
+	 * We need the root dentry to do this, which is in the super
+	 * block. A pointer to that is in the struct vfsmount that we
+	 * have around.
+	 */
+	if (!parent)
+		parent = drmfs_mount->mnt_root;
+
+	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
+	dentry = lookup_one_len(name, parent, strlen(name));
+	if (!IS_ERR(dentry) && dentry->d_inode) {
+		dput(dentry);
+		dentry = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
+	}
+
+	if (IS_ERR(dentry)) {
+		inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+		simple_release_fs(&drmfs_mount, &drmfs_mount_count);
+	}
+
+	return dentry;
+}
+
+static struct dentry *failed_creating(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	inode_unlock(dentry->d_parent->d_inode);
+	dput(dentry);
+	simple_release_fs(&drmfs_mount, &drmfs_mount_count);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct dentry *end_creating(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	inode_unlock(dentry->d_parent->d_inode);
+	return dentry;
+}
+
+/**
+ * drmfs_create_file - create a file in the drmfs filesystem
+ * @name: a pointer to a string containing the name of the file to create.
+ * @mode: the permission that the file should have.
+ * @parent: a pointer to the parent dentry for this file.  This should be a
+ *          directory dentry if set.  If this parameter is NULL, then the
+ *          file will be created in the root of the drmfs filesystem.
+ * @data: a pointer to something that the caller will want to get to later
+ *        on.  The inode.i_private pointer will point to this value on
+ *        the open() call.
+ * @fops: a pointer to a struct file_operations that should be used for
+ *        this file.
+ *
+ * This is the basic "create a file" function for drmfs.  It allows for a
+ * wide range of flexibility in creating a file, or a directory (if you want
+ * to create a directory, the drmfs_create_dir() function is
+ * recommended to be used instead.)
+ *
+ * This function will return a pointer to a dentry if it succeeds.  This
+ * pointer must be passed to the drmfs_remove() function when the file is
+ * to be removed (no automatic cleanup happens if your module is unloaded,
+ * you are responsible here.)  If an error occurs, %NULL will be returned.
+ *
+ */
+struct dentry *drmfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
+				   struct dentry *parent, void *data,
+				   const struct file_operations *fops)
+{
+	struct dentry *dentry;
+	struct inode *inode;
+
+	if (!(mode & S_IFMT))
+		mode |= S_IFREG;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!S_ISREG(mode)))
+		return NULL;
+
+	dentry = start_creating(name, parent);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
+		return NULL;
+
+	inode = drmfs_get_inode(dentry->d_sb);
+	if (unlikely(!inode))
+		return failed_creating(dentry);
+
+	inode->i_mode = mode;
+	inode->i_fop = fops ? fops : &drmfs_default_file_operations;
+	inode->i_private = data;
+	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+	fsnotify_create(dentry->d_parent->d_inode, dentry);
+	return end_creating(dentry);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmfs_create_file);
+
+static struct dentry *__create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent,
+				   const struct inode_operations *ops)
+{
+	struct dentry *dentry = start_creating(name, parent);
+	struct inode *inode;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
+		return NULL;
+
+	inode = drmfs_get_inode(dentry->d_sb);
+	if (unlikely(!inode))
+		return failed_creating(dentry);
+
+	inode->i_mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRWXU | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO;
+	inode->i_op = ops;
+	inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
+
+	/* directory inodes start off with i_nlink == 2 (for "." entry) */
+	inc_nlink(inode);
+	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
+	inc_nlink(dentry->d_parent->d_inode);
+	fsnotify_mkdir(dentry->d_parent->d_inode, dentry);
+	return end_creating(dentry);
+}
+
+/**
+ * drmfs_create_dir - create a directory in the drmfs filesystem
+ * @name: a pointer to a string containing the name of the directory to
+ *        create.
+ * @parent: a pointer to the parent dentry for this file.  This should be a
+ *          directory dentry if set.  If this parameter is NULL, then the
+ *          directory will be created in the root of the drmfs filesystem.
+ *
+ * This function creates a directory in drmfs with the given name.
+ *
+ * This function will return a pointer to a dentry if it succeeds.  This
+ * pointer must be passed to the drmfs_remove() function when the file is
+ * to be removed. If an error occurs, %NULL will be returned.
+ *
+ */
+struct dentry *drmfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
+{
+	return __create_dir(name, parent, &simple_dir_inode_operations);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmfs_create_dir);
+
+static int __drmfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (simple_positive(dentry)) {
+		if (dentry->d_inode) {
+			dget(dentry);
+			switch (dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
+			case S_IFDIR:
+				ret = simple_rmdir(parent->d_inode, dentry);
+				break;
+			default:
+				simple_unlink(parent->d_inode, dentry);
+				break;
+			}
+			if (!ret)
+				d_delete(dentry);
+			dput(dentry);
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * drmfs_remove - removes a file or directory from the drmfs filesystem
+ * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the file or directory to be
+ *          removed.
+ *
+ * This function removes a file or directory in drmfs that was previously
+ * created with a call to another drmfs function (like
+ * drmfs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
+ */
+void drmfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	struct dentry *parent;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
+		return;
+
+	parent = dentry->d_parent;
+	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
+	ret = __drmfs_remove(dentry, parent);
+	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+	if (!ret)
+		simple_release_fs(&drmfs_mount, &drmfs_mount_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmfs_remove);
+
+/**
+ * drmfs_remove_recursive - recursively removes a directory
+ * @dentry: a pointer to a the dentry of the directory to be removed.
+ *
+ * This function recursively removes a directory tree in drmfs that
+ * was previously created with a call to another drmfs function
+ * (like drmfs_create_file() or variants thereof.)
+ */
+void drmfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	struct dentry *child, *parent;
+
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
+		return;
+
+	parent = dentry;
+ down:
+	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
+ loop:
+	/*
+	 * The parent->d_subdirs is protected by the d_lock. Outside that
+	 * lock, the child can be unlinked and set to be freed which can
+	 * use the d_u.d_child as the rcu head and corrupt this list.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(child, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
+		if (!simple_positive(child))
+			continue;
+
+		/* perhaps simple_empty(child) makes more sense */
+		if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
+			spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+			inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+			parent = child;
+			goto down;
+		}
+
+		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+
+		if (!__drmfs_remove(child, parent))
+			simple_release_fs(&drmfs_mount, &drmfs_mount_count);
+
+		/*
+		 * The parent->d_lock protects against child from unlinking
+		 * from d_subdirs. When releasing the parent->d_lock we can
+		 * no longer trust that the next pointer is valid.
+		 * Restart the loop. We'll skip this one with the
+		 * simple_positive() check.
+		 */
+		goto loop;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
+
+	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+	child = parent;
+	parent = parent->d_parent;
+	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
+
+	if (child != dentry)
+		/* go up */
+		goto loop;
+
+	if (!__drmfs_remove(child, parent))
+		simple_release_fs(&drmfs_mount, &drmfs_mount_count);
+	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmfs_remove_recursive);
+
+/**
+ * drmfs_initialized - Tells whether drmfs has been registered
+ */
+bool drmfs_initialized(void)
+{
+	return drmfs_registered;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drmfs_initialized);
+
+int drmfs_init(void)
+{
+	int retval;
+
+	retval = sysfs_create_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "drm");
+	if (retval)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	retval = register_filesystem(&drm_fs_type);
+	if (!retval)
+		drmfs_registered = true;
+
+	return retval;
+}
+
+void drmfs_fini(void)
+{
+	unregister_filesystem(&drm_fs_type);
+
+	drmfs_registered = false;
+
+	sysfs_remove_mount_point(kernel_kobj, "drm");
+}
diff --git a/include/drm/drmfs.h b/include/drm/drmfs.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6df16bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/drm/drmfs.h
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
+ * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
+ * Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+ * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
+ * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *	Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
+ *	Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
+ *	Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _DRMFS_H_
+#define _DRMFS_H_
+
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct file_operations;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DRMFS
+
+struct dentry *drmfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
+				   struct dentry *parent, void *data,
+				   const struct file_operations *fops);
+
+struct dentry *drmfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent);
+
+void drmfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry);
+void drmfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry);
+
+bool drmfs_initialized(void);
+int drmfs_init(void);
+void drmfs_fini(void);
+
+#else
+
+static inline struct dentry *drmfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
+				   struct dentry *parent, void *data,
+				   const struct file_operations *fops)
+{
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
+
+static inline struct dentry *drmfs_create_dir(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
+{
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+}
+
+static inline void drmfs_remove(struct dentry *dentry){}
+static inline void drmfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry){}
+
+static inline bool drmfs_initialized(void){return false;}
+static inline int drmfs_init(void){return -EINVAL;}
+static inline void drmfs_fini(void){}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_DRMFS */
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/magic.h b/include/uapi/linux/magic.h
index 9bd5594..ef01eb7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/magic.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/magic.h
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 #define STACK_END_MAGIC		0x57AC6E9D
 
 #define TRACEFS_MAGIC          0x74726163
+#define DRMFS_MAGIC	       0x84724143      /* some random number.
+						* Is there a better way?
+						*/
 
 #define V9FS_MAGIC		0x01021997
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [RFC 2/4] drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 1/4] drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces swati.dhingra
@ 2016-12-05 11:06 ` swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 3/4] drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs swati.dhingra
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: swati.dhingra @ 2016-12-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Swati Dhingra, dri-devel, Sourab Gupta

From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>

The drmfs filesystem will not be registered standalone during kernel init time,
instead it is intended to be initialized/registered during drm initialization.

Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index f74b7d0..298013c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+#include <drm/drmfs.h>
 #include <drm/drmP.h>
 
 #include "drm_crtc_internal.h"
@@ -828,6 +829,7 @@ static void drm_core_exit(void)
 {
 	unregister_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm");
 	debugfs_remove(drm_debugfs_root);
+	drmfs_fini();
 	drm_sysfs_destroy();
 	idr_destroy(&drm_minors_idr);
 	drm_connector_ida_destroy();
@@ -848,6 +850,10 @@ static int __init drm_core_init(void)
 		goto error;
 	}
 
+	ret = drmfs_init();
+	if (ret < 0)
+		DRM_ERROR("Cannot create DRM FS: %d\n", ret);
+
 	drm_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("dri", NULL);
 	if (!drm_debugfs_root) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [RFC 3/4] drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 1/4] drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 2/4] drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init swati.dhingra
@ 2016-12-05 11:06 ` swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs swati.dhingra
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: swati.dhingra @ 2016-12-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Swati Dhingra, dri-devel, Sourab Gupta

From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>

A driver specific directory is created inside drmfs root, and dentry of
this directory is saved for subsequent use by the driver (e.g. i915).
The driver can then create files/directories inside this root directory
directly.

In case of i915 driver, the top directory is created at '/sys/kernel/drm/i915'.

Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
 include/drm/drm_drv.h     | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index 298013c..4c32cf8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -671,6 +671,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_unref);
 int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	int ret;
+	struct dentry *drmfs_root;
+
+	drmfs_root = drmfs_create_dir(dev->driver->name, NULL);
+	if (!IS_ERR(drmfs_root))
+		dev->driver->drmfs_root = drmfs_root;
 
 	mutex_lock(&drm_global_mutex);
 
@@ -742,6 +747,7 @@ void drm_dev_unregister(struct drm_device *dev)
 	drm_minor_unregister(dev, DRM_MINOR_PRIMARY);
 	drm_minor_unregister(dev, DRM_MINOR_RENDER);
 	drm_minor_unregister(dev, DRM_MINOR_CONTROL);
+	drmfs_remove(dev->driver->drmfs_root);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_unregister);
 
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
index c4fc495..d646296 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
@@ -405,6 +405,9 @@ struct drm_driver {
 
 	/* List of devices hanging off this driver with stealth attach. */
 	struct list_head legacy_dev_list;
+
+	/* drmfs parent directory dentry for this driver */
+	struct dentry *drmfs_root;
 };
 
 extern __printf(6, 7)
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 3/4] drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs swati.dhingra
@ 2016-12-05 11:06 ` swati.dhingra
  2016-12-05 12:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3) Patchwork
  2016-12-12  6:14 ` [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem sourab gupta
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: swati.dhingra @ 2016-12-05 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Swati Dhingra, dri-devel, Sourab Gupta

From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>

In the current scenario, the relay API fit well only with debugfs, due to
availability of parent dentry. Any other existing filesystem was not feasible for
holding guc logs, due to incompatibility with relay. But this makes the  guc_log
file unavailable on the production kernels.

GuC log file can therefore be one of candidates for movement to the drmfs
filesystem, which can satisfy all the requirements needed by relay API, and can
house any relayfs based output file.

The patch moves the parent directory of guc 'log_dir' from debugfs_root to
drmfs_root, while using the drmfs api's to create the requisite files.

Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 33 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 5841380..3f5978a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
  *
  */
 #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
-#include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/relay.h>
+#include <drm/drmfs.h>
 #include "i915_drv.h"
 #include "intel_uc.h"
 
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static int subbuf_start_callback(struct rchan_buf *buf,
 }
 
 /*
- * file_create() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs.
+ * file_create() callback. Creates relay file.
  */
 static struct dentry *create_buf_file_callback(const char *filename,
 					       struct dentry *parent,
@@ -838,17 +838,19 @@ static struct dentry *create_buf_file_callback(const char *filename,
 	 * dentry of the file associated with the channel buffer and that file's
 	 * name need not be same as the filename passed as an argument.
 	 */
-	buf_file = debugfs_create_file("guc_log", mode,
+
+	buf_file = drmfs_create_file("guc_log", mode,
 				       parent, buf, &relay_file_operations);
+
 	return buf_file;
 }
 
 /*
- * file_remove() default callback. Removes relay file in debugfs.
+ * file_remove() default callback. Removes relay file.
  */
 static int remove_buf_file_callback(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-	debugfs_remove(dentry);
+	drmfs_remove(dentry);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -898,22 +900,11 @@ static int guc_log_create_relay_file(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	struct dentry *log_dir;
 	int ret;
 
-	/* For now create the log file in /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0 dir */
-	log_dir = dev_priv->drm.primary->debugfs_root;
-
-	/* If /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0 location do not exist, then debugfs is
-	 * not mounted and so can't create the relay file.
-	 * The relay API seems to fit well with debugfs only, for availing relay
-	 * there are 3 requirements which can be met for debugfs file only in a
-	 * straightforward/clean manner :-
-	 * i)   Need the associated dentry pointer of the file, while opening the
-	 *      relay channel.
-	 * ii)  Should be able to use 'relay_file_operations' fops for the file.
-	 * iii) Set the 'i_private' field of file's inode to the pointer of
-	 *	relay channel buffer.
-	 */
+	/* Create the log file in drmfs dir: /sys/kernel/drm/i915/ */
+	log_dir = dev_priv->drm.driver->drmfs_root;
+
 	if (!log_dir) {
-		DRM_ERROR("Debugfs dir not available yet for GuC log file\n");
+		DRM_ERROR("Root dir not available yet for GuC log file\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
@@ -1154,7 +1145,7 @@ static int guc_log_create_extras(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	if (!guc->log.relay_chan) {
 		/* Create a relay channel, so that we have buffers for storing
 		 * the GuC firmware logs, the channel will be linked with a file
-		 * later on when debugfs is registered.
+		 * later on when drmfs is registered.
 		 */
 		ret = guc_log_create_relay_channel(guc);
 		if (ret)
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3)
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs swati.dhingra
@ 2016-12-05 12:15 ` Patchwork
  2016-12-05 13:05   ` Saarinen, Jani
  2016-12-12  6:14 ` [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem sourab gupta
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-12-05 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: swati.dhingra; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16203/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Series 16203v3 Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16203/revisions/3/mbox/

Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup bad-nb-words-3:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)

fi-bdw-5557u     total:247  pass:232  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
fi-bsw-n3050     total:247  pass:207  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40 
fi-byt-j1900     total:247  pass:219  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28 
fi-byt-n2820     total:247  pass:215  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
fi-hsw-4770      total:247  pass:227  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20 
fi-hsw-4770r     total:247  pass:227  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20 
fi-ilk-650       total:247  pass:194  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:53 
fi-ivb-3520m     total:247  pass:225  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
fi-ivb-3770      total:247  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
fi-kbl-7500u     total:247  pass:225  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
fi-skl-6260u     total:247  pass:233  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
fi-skl-6700hq    total:247  pass:226  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
fi-skl-6700k     total:247  pass:223  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21 
fi-skl-6770hq    total:247  pass:233  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
fi-snb-2520m     total:247  pass:215  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32 
fi-snb-2600      total:247  pass:214  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33 

a17bd268c6f9e1076a9aea44573ff58b0caeb44d drm-tip: 2016y-12m-05d-11h-19m-41s UTC integration manifest
6987287 drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
50a4a18 drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
df2fc99 drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
d340379 drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3186/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3)
  2016-12-05 12:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2016-12-05 13:05   ` Saarinen, Jani
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Saarinen, Jani @ 2016-12-05 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, Dhingra, Swati

> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16203/
> State : warning
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> Series 16203v3 Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16203/revisions/3/mbox/
> 
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>         Subgroup bad-nb-words-3:
>                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-ivb-3770)
Stil, there: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
> fi-ivb-3770      total:247  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22
> 
> a17bd268c6f9e1076a9aea44573ff58b0caeb44d drm-tip: 2016y-12m-05d-11h-
> 19m-41s UTC integration manifest
> 6987287 drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
> 50a4a18 drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
> df2fc99 drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
> d340379 drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3186/


Jani Saarinen
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo



_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
  2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-12-05 12:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3) Patchwork
@ 2016-12-12  6:14 ` sourab gupta
  2016-12-12 15:33   ` Alex Deucher
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: sourab gupta @ 2016-12-12  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, Dhingra, Swati

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 03:06 -0800, Dhingra, Swati wrote:
> From: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
> 
> Currently, we don't have a stable ABI which can be used for the purpose of
> providing output debug/loggging/crc and other such data from DRM.
> The ABI in current use (filesystems, ioctls, et al.) have their own
> constraints and are intended to output a particular type of data.
> Few cases in point:
> sysfs   - stable ABI, but constrained to one textual value per file
> debugfs - unstable ABI, free-for-all
> ioctls  - not as suitable to many single purpose continuous data
>           dumping, we would very quickly run out ioctl space; requires more
>           userspace support than "cat"
> device nodes -  a real possibilty, kernel instantiation is more tricky,
>                 requires udev (+udev.rules) or userspace discovery of the
>                 dynamic major:minor (via sysfs) [mounting a registered
>                 filesystem is easy in comparison]
> netlink - stream based, therefore involves numerous copies.
> 
> Debugfs is the lesser among the evils here, thereby we have grown used to the
> convenience and flexibility in presentation that debugfs gives us
> (including relayfs inodes) that we want some of that hierachy in stable user
> ABI form.
> 
> Due to these limitations, there is a need for a new pseudo filesytem, that
> would act as a stable 'free-for-all' ABI, with the heirarchial structure and
> thus convenience of debugfs. This will be managed by drm, thus named 'drmfs'.
> DRM would register this filesystem to manage a canonical mountpoint, but this
> wouldn't limit everyone to only using that pseudofs underneath.
> 
> This can serve to hold various kinds of output data from Linux DRM subsystems,
> for the files which can't truely fit anywhere else with existing ABI's but
> present so, for the lack of a better place.
> 
> In this patch series, we have introduced a pseudo filesystem named as 'drmfs'
> for now. The filesystem is introduced in the first patch, and the subsequent
> patches make use of the filesystem interfaces, in drm driver, and making them
> available for use by the drm subsystem components, one of which is i915.
> We've moved the location of i915 GuC logs from debugfs to drmfs in the last
> patch. Subsequently, more such files such as pipe_crc, error states, memory
> stats, etc. can be move to this filesystem, if the idea introduced here is
> acceptable per se. The filesystem introduced is being used to house the data
> generated by i915 driver in this patch series, but will hopefully be generic
> enough to provide scope for usage by any other drm subsystem component.
> 
> The patch series is being floated as RFC to gather feedback on the idea and
> infrastructure proposed here and it's suitability to address the specific
> problem statement/use case.
> 
> TODO: Create documentation. Will do so in next version.
> 
> v2: fix the bat failures caused due to missing config check
> 
> v3: Changes made:
>     - Move the location of drmfs from fs/ to drivers/gpu/drm/ (Chris)
>     - Moving config checks to header (Chris,Daniel)
> 
> 
> Sourab Gupta (4):
>   drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
>   drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
>   drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
>   drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig                    |   9 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile                   |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c                  |  12 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c                    | 555 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  33 +-
>  include/drm/drm_drv.h                      |   3 +
>  include/drm/drmfs.h                        |  77 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                 |   3 +
>  8 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
>  create mode 100644 include/drm/drmfs.h
> 
> --
> 2.7.4
> 

Hi dri-devel folks,

Any feedback on the proposed drmfs infrastructure being proposed here?

Regards,
Sourab


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
  2016-12-12  6:14 ` [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem sourab gupta
@ 2016-12-12 15:33   ` Alex Deucher
  2016-12-14  8:49     ` sourab gupta
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2016-12-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sourab gupta; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, Dhingra, Swati, dri-devel

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:14 AM, sourab gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 03:06 -0800, Dhingra, Swati wrote:
>> From: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
>>
>> Currently, we don't have a stable ABI which can be used for the purpose of
>> providing output debug/loggging/crc and other such data from DRM.
>> The ABI in current use (filesystems, ioctls, et al.) have their own
>> constraints and are intended to output a particular type of data.
>> Few cases in point:
>> sysfs   - stable ABI, but constrained to one textual value per file
>> debugfs - unstable ABI, free-for-all
>> ioctls  - not as suitable to many single purpose continuous data
>>           dumping, we would very quickly run out ioctl space; requires more
>>           userspace support than "cat"
>> device nodes -  a real possibilty, kernel instantiation is more tricky,
>>                 requires udev (+udev.rules) or userspace discovery of the
>>                 dynamic major:minor (via sysfs) [mounting a registered
>>                 filesystem is easy in comparison]
>> netlink - stream based, therefore involves numerous copies.
>>
>> Debugfs is the lesser among the evils here, thereby we have grown used to the
>> convenience and flexibility in presentation that debugfs gives us
>> (including relayfs inodes) that we want some of that hierachy in stable user
>> ABI form.
>>
>> Due to these limitations, there is a need for a new pseudo filesytem, that
>> would act as a stable 'free-for-all' ABI, with the heirarchial structure and
>> thus convenience of debugfs. This will be managed by drm, thus named 'drmfs'.
>> DRM would register this filesystem to manage a canonical mountpoint, but this
>> wouldn't limit everyone to only using that pseudofs underneath.
>>
>> This can serve to hold various kinds of output data from Linux DRM subsystems,
>> for the files which can't truely fit anywhere else with existing ABI's but
>> present so, for the lack of a better place.
>>
>> In this patch series, we have introduced a pseudo filesystem named as 'drmfs'
>> for now. The filesystem is introduced in the first patch, and the subsequent
>> patches make use of the filesystem interfaces, in drm driver, and making them
>> available for use by the drm subsystem components, one of which is i915.
>> We've moved the location of i915 GuC logs from debugfs to drmfs in the last
>> patch. Subsequently, more such files such as pipe_crc, error states, memory
>> stats, etc. can be move to this filesystem, if the idea introduced here is
>> acceptable per se. The filesystem introduced is being used to house the data
>> generated by i915 driver in this patch series, but will hopefully be generic
>> enough to provide scope for usage by any other drm subsystem component.
>>
>> The patch series is being floated as RFC to gather feedback on the idea and
>> infrastructure proposed here and it's suitability to address the specific
>> problem statement/use case.
>>
>> TODO: Create documentation. Will do so in next version.
>>
>> v2: fix the bat failures caused due to missing config check
>>
>> v3: Changes made:
>>     - Move the location of drmfs from fs/ to drivers/gpu/drm/ (Chris)
>>     - Moving config checks to header (Chris,Daniel)
>>
>>
>> Sourab Gupta (4):
>>   drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
>>   drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
>>   drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
>>   drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig                    |   9 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile                   |   1 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c                  |  12 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c                    | 555 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  33 +-
>>  include/drm/drm_drv.h                      |   3 +
>>  include/drm/drmfs.h                        |  77 ++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                 |   3 +
>>  8 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/drm/drmfs.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
> Hi dri-devel folks,
>
> Any feedback on the proposed drmfs infrastructure being proposed here?

I haven't looked too closely, but so far we haven't run into anything
that we haven't been able to support via some combination of sysfs and
debugfs.

Alex
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem
  2016-12-12 15:33   ` Alex Deucher
@ 2016-12-14  8:49     ` sourab gupta
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sourab gupta @ 2016-12-14  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Deucher; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, Dhingra, Swati, dri-devel

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 07:33 -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:14 AM, sourab gupta <sourab.gupta@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 03:06 -0800, Dhingra, Swati wrote:
> >> From: Swati Dhingra <swati.dhingra@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Currently, we don't have a stable ABI which can be used for the purpose of
> >> providing output debug/loggging/crc and other such data from DRM.
> >> The ABI in current use (filesystems, ioctls, et al.) have their own
> >> constraints and are intended to output a particular type of data.
> >> Few cases in point:
> >> sysfs   - stable ABI, but constrained to one textual value per file
> >> debugfs - unstable ABI, free-for-all
> >> ioctls  - not as suitable to many single purpose continuous data
> >>           dumping, we would very quickly run out ioctl space; requires more
> >>           userspace support than "cat"
> >> device nodes -  a real possibilty, kernel instantiation is more tricky,
> >>                 requires udev (+udev.rules) or userspace discovery of the
> >>                 dynamic major:minor (via sysfs) [mounting a registered
> >>                 filesystem is easy in comparison]
> >> netlink - stream based, therefore involves numerous copies.
> >>
> >> Debugfs is the lesser among the evils here, thereby we have grown used to the
> >> convenience and flexibility in presentation that debugfs gives us
> >> (including relayfs inodes) that we want some of that hierachy in stable user
> >> ABI form.
> >>
> >> Due to these limitations, there is a need for a new pseudo filesytem, that
> >> would act as a stable 'free-for-all' ABI, with the heirarchial structure and
> >> thus convenience of debugfs. This will be managed by drm, thus named 'drmfs'.
> >> DRM would register this filesystem to manage a canonical mountpoint, but this
> >> wouldn't limit everyone to only using that pseudofs underneath.
> >>
> >> This can serve to hold various kinds of output data from Linux DRM subsystems,
> >> for the files which can't truely fit anywhere else with existing ABI's but
> >> present so, for the lack of a better place.
> >>
> >> In this patch series, we have introduced a pseudo filesystem named as 'drmfs'
> >> for now. The filesystem is introduced in the first patch, and the subsequent
> >> patches make use of the filesystem interfaces, in drm driver, and making them
> >> available for use by the drm subsystem components, one of which is i915.
> >> We've moved the location of i915 GuC logs from debugfs to drmfs in the last
> >> patch. Subsequently, more such files such as pipe_crc, error states, memory
> >> stats, etc. can be move to this filesystem, if the idea introduced here is
> >> acceptable per se. The filesystem introduced is being used to house the data
> >> generated by i915 driver in this patch series, but will hopefully be generic
> >> enough to provide scope for usage by any other drm subsystem component.
> >>
> >> The patch series is being floated as RFC to gather feedback on the idea and
> >> infrastructure proposed here and it's suitability to address the specific
> >> problem statement/use case.
> >>
> >> TODO: Create documentation. Will do so in next version.
> >>
> >> v2: fix the bat failures caused due to missing config check
> >>
> >> v3: Changes made:
> >>     - Move the location of drmfs from fs/ to drivers/gpu/drm/ (Chris)
> >>     - Moving config checks to header (Chris,Daniel)
> >>
> >>
> >> Sourab Gupta (4):
> >>   drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces
> >>   drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init
> >>   drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs
> >>   drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs
> >>
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig                    |   9 +
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile                   |   1 +
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c                  |  12 +
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c                    | 555 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |  33 +-
> >>  include/drm/drm_drv.h                      |   3 +
> >>  include/drm/drmfs.h                        |  77 ++++
> >>  include/uapi/linux/magic.h                 |   3 +
> >>  8 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drmfs.c
> >>  create mode 100644 include/drm/drmfs.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >
> > Hi dri-devel folks,
> >
> > Any feedback on the proposed drmfs infrastructure being proposed here?
> 
> I haven't looked too closely, but so far we haven't run into anything
> that we haven't been able to support via some combination of sysfs and
> debugfs.
> 
> Alex

Hi Alex,

The intent here is to introduce a stable free-for-all ABI which has the
hierarchical structure and convenience of debugfs. One of the possible
candidate/usecase here is for holding the GuC (micro-controller) logs.
Currently, we're using relayfs to provide these logs to userspace.
Relayfs needs a parent dentry to be associated with log file, and also
we need these logs to be available in production kernels. In absence of
any other suitable candidate, debugfs is used currently, since it
provides the heirarchial VFS structures available (dentry et al.). But
still we felt the need for a stable ABI, which is modeled on lines of
debugfs but which we can control fully.

Chris,
Can you add on if I'm not fully clear.

Regards,
Sourab


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-14  8:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-05 11:06 [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem swati.dhingra
2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 1/4] drm: Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem interfaces swati.dhingra
2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 2/4] drm: Register drmfs filesystem from drm init swati.dhingra
2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 3/4] drm: Create driver specific root directory inside drmfs swati.dhingra
2016-12-05 11:06 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Creating guc log file in drmfs instead of debugfs swati.dhingra
2016-12-05 12:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem (rev3) Patchwork
2016-12-05 13:05   ` Saarinen, Jani
2016-12-12  6:14 ` [RFC 0/4] Introduce drmfs pseudo filesystem for drm subsystem sourab gupta
2016-12-12 15:33   ` Alex Deucher
2016-12-14  8:49     ` sourab gupta

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.