* type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE
@ 2006-07-13 21:03 Michael C Thompson
2006-07-16 12:41 ` type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Steve Grubb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael C Thompson @ 2006-07-13 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Audit, Steve Grubb, Amy Griffis
Hey Steve / Amy,
In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record
is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad]. I do not think
that USER_ROLE_CHANGE is a good name to have associated with SELinux
user creation/removal, not to mention that the payload of the record
resulting from newrole looks nothing like the payload from that
generated by semanage user -[ad].
Can we add a USER_ROLE_MODIFY, or some other label, that would indicate
and differentiate SELinux user creation/removal from a simple newrole?
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE
2006-07-13 21:03 type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Michael C Thompson
@ 2006-07-16 12:41 ` Steve Grubb
2006-07-17 18:02 ` type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Michael C Thompson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steve Grubb @ 2006-07-16 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael C Thompson; +Cc: Linux Audit
On Thursday 13 July 2006 17:03, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record
> is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad].
semanage should also be using these:
#define AUDIT_ROLE_ASSIGN 2301 /* Admin assigned user to role */
#define AUDIT_ROLE_REMOVE 2302 /* Admin removed user from role */
USER_ROLE_CHANGE should only be used when newrole is used. If semanage needs
more record types let me know.
-Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE
2006-07-16 12:41 ` type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Steve Grubb
@ 2006-07-17 18:02 ` Michael C Thompson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael C Thompson @ 2006-07-17 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Grubb; +Cc: Linux Audit
Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 13 July 2006 17:03, Michael C Thompson wrote:
>> In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record
>> is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad].
>
> semanage should also be using these:
>
> #define AUDIT_ROLE_ASSIGN 2301 /* Admin assigned user to role */
> #define AUDIT_ROLE_REMOVE 2302 /* Admin removed user from role */
>
> USER_ROLE_CHANGE should only be used when newrole is used. If semanage needs
> more record types let me know.
>
> -Steve
Hey Steve,
I do not believe these messages are implemented, or at least are not
properly used, in semanage. Doing semanage user changes or semanage
login changes only result in USER_ROLE_CHANGE messages.
'semanage user -d deleteme_u' yeilds:
type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE msg=audit(1153152594.356:685): user pid=10862
uid=0 auid=0 subj=root:staff_r:staff_t:s0-s15:c0.c255 msg='op=delete
SELinux user record acct=deleteme_u old-seuser=? old-role=? old-range=?
new-seuser=? new-role=? new-range=? exe=/usr/sbin/semanage (hostname=?,
addr=?, terminal=pts/2 res=success)'
This is seen with policycoreutils-1.30.17-2.
Thanks,
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-17 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-13 21:03 type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Michael C Thompson
2006-07-16 12:41 ` type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Steve Grubb
2006-07-17 18:02 ` type=USER_ROLE_CHANGE Michael C Thompson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.