[PATCH] Longhaul - Fix multipliers table

[PATCH] Longhaul - Fix multipliers table

[Rafał Bilski]

This patch fix multiplier table. Some values are swaped
and 9.0*133MHz processor is incorrecly reported as 
5.0*133MHz.

Signed-off-by: Rafa³ Bilski <rafalbilski@interia.pl>

---

--- linux-2.6.17-git20/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c.orig	2006-07-14 19:22:01.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17-git20/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c	2006-07-14 19:27:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -323,8 +323,10 @@ static int __init longhaul_get_ranges(vo
 {
 	unsigned long invalue;
 	unsigned int multipliers[32]= {
-		50,40,30,100,55,35,45,95,90,70,80,60,120,75,85,65,
-		-1,110,120,-1,135,115,125,105,130,150,160,140,-1,155,-1,145 };
+		 90,  30,  40, 100,  55,  35,  45,  95,
+		 50,  70,  80,  60, 120,  75,  85,  65,
+		 -1, 110, 120,  -1, 135, 115, 125, 105,
+		130, 150, 160, 140,  -1, 155,  -1, 145 };
 	unsigned int j, k = 0;
 	union msr_longhaul longhaul;
 	unsigned long lo, hi;


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Upal jakby mniejszy... http://link.interia.pl/f1975

Re: [PATCH] Longhaul - Fix multipliers table

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:36:05PM +0200, Rafał Bilski wrote:
 > This patch fix multiplier table. Some values are swaped
 > and 9.0*133MHz processor is incorrecly reported as 
 > 5.0*133MHz.

Wow, not sure what happened there. Looks like there was some
confusion over which CPU this table was for.

Care to rename multipliers to ezra_t_multipliers or c5m_multipliers
at the same time to ease the confusion?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk