* Re: review: greedy allocator vs kmflags
[not found] <20060828163004.B3100886@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
@ 2006-08-28 7:00 ` Vlad Apostolov
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Vlad Apostolov @ 2006-08-28 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Scott; +Cc: xfs
Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> This is the last iteration on updating the greedy alloc routine to
> be more generic and properly handle the passed in flags wrt sleep or
> nosleep (following up on Dave's suggestion, and someone else to me
> privately, offlist). Could you give it a final review for me?
>
> thanks.
>
>
It is looking good Nathan. One thing I noticed today when I was building
the modules
was that kmem_zalloc_greedy() is already in use in several places. There
were a few warnings about type mismatch of the first argument "size_t
*size" and
missing kmem_zalloc_greedy symbol at the end. Not sure if this is
important but just
thought to mention it.
Regards,
Vlad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-08-28 7:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20060828163004.B3100886@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
2006-08-28 7:00 ` review: greedy allocator vs kmflags Vlad Apostolov
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.