All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* problem with kernel make in debian
@ 2012-11-19  5:32 horse_rivers
  2012-11-19 18:11 ` Mulyadi Santosa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: horse_rivers @ 2012-11-19  5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

hi,
? ?
? ? when I make kernel linux2.0 ?in debian ,which first do "make dep" ,but since it find no gensymb tool ,so it failed.

? ? how to resolve this issure?

? ?

thanks sincerely!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-19  5:32 problem with kernel make in debian horse_rivers
@ 2012-11-19 18:11 ` Mulyadi Santosa
  2012-11-20  1:30   ` horse_rivers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2012-11-19 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:32 PM, horse_rivers <horse_rivers@126.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
>     when I make kernel linux2.0  in debian ,which first do "make dep" ,but since it find no gensymb tool ,so it failed.

do I read correctly that you wanna compile linux kernel version 2.0?
On top of modern distro such as Slackware 13.37?

I think you will fail...unless, you use ported kernel that is
compile-able with recent gcc toolchain.


-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-19 18:11 ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2012-11-20  1:30   ` horse_rivers
  2012-11-20 10:36     ` Mulyadi Santosa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: horse_rivers @ 2012-11-20  1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies


thanks!

do you mean that the compile environment is not confortable for linux2.0?
but I find ?from google ?that I can do some modify for this done well .

gensymb is a tool,which deal with kernel sysmboles.of course,it ?can be installed .


BestRegards!?

At?2012-11-20?02:11:56,"Mulyadi?Santosa"?<mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>?wrote:
>On?Mon,?Nov?19,?2012?at?12:32?PM,?horse_rivers?<horse_rivers@126.com>?wrote:
>>?hi,
>>
>>?????when?I?make?kernel?linux2.0??in?debian?,which?first?do?"make?dep"?,but?since?it?find?no?gensymb?tool?,so?it?failed.
>
>do?I?read?correctly?that?you?wanna?compile?linux?kernel?version?2.0?
>On?top?of?modern?distro?such?as?Slackware?13.37?
>
>I?think?you?will?fail...unless,?you?use?ported?kernel?that?is
>compile-able?with?recent?gcc?toolchain.
>
>
>--?
>regards,
>
>Mulyadi?Santosa
>Freelance?Linux?trainer?and?consultant
>
>blog:?the-hydra.blogspot.com
>training:?mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-20  1:30   ` horse_rivers
@ 2012-11-20 10:36     ` Mulyadi Santosa
  2012-11-21  3:42       ` horse_rivers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2012-11-20 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

Hi :)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:30 AM, horse_rivers <horse_rivers@126.com> wrote:
>
> thanks!
>
> do you mean that the compile environment is not confortable for linux2.0?

generally, yes, that's what I meant. However, if you're patient, you
can modify the source to better match the environment. But I am not
sure, how much effort you will spend.

Try googling, some one else did something similar for linux kernel
0.1. Maybe you can get idea from that. Sorry, I have no URL in  hand
right now.

> but I find  from google  that I can do some modify for this done well .

but, does the document explain whether the result is really compatible
with current version of toolchain?

> gensymb is a tool,which deal with kernel sysmboles.of course,it  can be installed .

never heard of it...but again, can you find the source ?


-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-20 10:36     ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2012-11-21  3:42       ` horse_rivers
  2012-11-22  4:02         ` Mulyadi Santosa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: horse_rivers @ 2012-11-21  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies


thank ?you !

I have got a 0.11 version kernel which has been modified to be compatible ?for the?current version of toolchain?

and I think I can also ?do this work ? for 1.0 version ? !?

BestRegards!

At?2012-11-20?18:36:20,"Mulyadi?Santosa"?<mulyadi.santosa@gmail.com>?wrote:
>Hi?:)
>
>On?Tue,?Nov?20,?2012?at?8:30?AM,?horse_rivers?<horse_rivers@126.com>?wrote:
>>
>>?thanks!
>>
>>?do?you?mean?that?the?compile?environment?is?not?confortable?for?linux2.0?
>
>generally,?yes,?that's?what?I?meant.?However,?if?you're?patient,?you
>can?modify?the?source?to?better?match?the?environment.?But?I?am?not
>sure,?how?much?effort?you?will?spend.
>
>Try?googling,?some?one?else?did?something?similar?for?linux?kernel
>0.1.?Maybe?you?can?get?idea?from?that.?Sorry,?I?have?no?URL?in??hand
>right?now.
>
>>?but?I?find??from?google??that?I?can?do?some?modify?for?this?done?well?.
>
>but,?does?the?document?explain?whether?the?result?is?really?compatible
>with?current?version?of?toolchain?
>
>>?gensymb?is?a?tool,which?deal?with?kernel?sysmboles.of?course,it??can?be?installed?.
>
>never?heard?of?it...but?again,?can?you?find?the?source??
>
>
>--?
>regards,
>
>Mulyadi?Santosa
>Freelance?Linux?trainer?and?consultant
>
>blog:?the-hydra.blogspot.com
>training:?mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kernelnewbies?mailing?list
>Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
>http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-21  3:42       ` horse_rivers
@ 2012-11-22  4:02         ` Mulyadi Santosa
  2012-11-22  4:24           ` horse_rivers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2012-11-22  4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

Hi :)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:42 AM, horse_rivers <horse_rivers@126.com> wrote:
>
> thank  you !
>
> I have got a 0.11 version kernel which has been modified to be compatible  for the current version of toolchain?
>
> and I think I can also  do this work   for 1.0 version   !

don't top post, ok? :)

And good luck. Don't forget to share your progress, ok? ;)


-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* problem with kernel make in debian
  2012-11-22  4:02         ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2012-11-22  4:24           ` horse_rivers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: horse_rivers @ 2012-11-22  4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernelnewbies

?
>don't?top?post,?ok??:)

ok:?


>And?good?luck.?Don't?forget?to?share?your?progress,?ok??;)
?of cource!
?as you say,the current gcc do not ?support ?some code,

for example : ? 1. ?inline asm code ?form?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2. CFLAG can not pass to subdirs


my process is continuing ..... ?:)

?

BestRegards!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-22  4:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-11-19  5:32 problem with kernel make in debian horse_rivers
2012-11-19 18:11 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2012-11-20  1:30   ` horse_rivers
2012-11-20 10:36     ` Mulyadi Santosa
2012-11-21  3:42       ` horse_rivers
2012-11-22  4:02         ` Mulyadi Santosa
2012-11-22  4:24           ` horse_rivers

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.