All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] block: don't hide inode from block_device users
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:40:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46559402-1d69-455d-ad09-27f43f6c0a3a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ebe92ed4-6847-0ec0-d5e7-e3485ba7e049@gmail.com>



On 10/13/2021 11:12 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 10/13/21 16:03, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on v5.15-rc5]
> 
> It's against for-5.16/block and there is no more block_ioctl() in
> fops.c, should be fine

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the feedback, we'll take a look.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

> 
> 
>> [cannot apply to axboe-block/for-next next-20211013]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pavel-Begunkov/on-top-of-for-5-16-block/20211013-165953 
>>
>> base:    64570fbc14f8d7cb3fe3995f20e26bc25ce4b2cc
>> config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20211013 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 
>> b6a8c695542b2987eb9a203d5663a0740cb4725f)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>          wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross 
>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # 
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9e538de87cc869bd26a3ca78da49d1437ec8688c 
>>
>>          git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
>> Pavel-Begunkov/on-top-of-for-5-16-block/20211013-165953
>>          git checkout 9e538de87cc869bd26a3ca78da49d1437ec8688c
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross 
>> W=1 ARCH=hexagon
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> block/fops.c:460:37: error: implicit declaration of function 
>>>> 'bdev_file_inode' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>             struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>>                                                ^
>>     block/fops.c:460:37: note: did you mean 'file_inode'?
>>     include/linux/fs.h:1348:29: note: 'file_inode' declared here
>>     static inline struct inode *file_inode(const struct file *f)
>>                                 ^
>>>> block/fops.c:460:37: warning: incompatible integer to pointer 
>>>> conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'struct inode *' 
>>>> [-Wint-conversion]
>>             struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>>                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>     include/linux/blkdev.h:1990:57: note: passing argument to 
>> parameter 'inode' here
>>     static inline struct block_device *I_BDEV(struct inode *inode)
>>                                                             ^
>>     1 warning and 1 error generated.
>>
>>
>> vim +/bdev_file_inode +460 block/fops.c
>>
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  457
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  458  static long 
>> block_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  459  {
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07 @460      struct 
>> block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  461      fmode_t mode = 
>> file->f_mode;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  462
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  463      /*
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  464       * O_NDELAY can 
>> be altered using fcntl(.., F_SETFL, ..), so we have
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  465       * to updated it 
>> before every ioctl.
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  466       */
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  467      if 
>> (file->f_flags & O_NDELAY)
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  468          mode |= 
>> FMODE_NDELAY;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  469      else
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  470          mode &= 
>> ~FMODE_NDELAY;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  471
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  472      return 
>> blkdev_ioctl(bdev, mode, cmd, arg);
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  473  }
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  474
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>>
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen, Rong A <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] block: don't hide inode from block_device users
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:40:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46559402-1d69-455d-ad09-27f43f6c0a3a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ebe92ed4-6847-0ec0-d5e7-e3485ba7e049@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5031 bytes --]



On 10/13/2021 11:12 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 10/13/21 16:03, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on v5.15-rc5]
> 
> It's against for-5.16/block and there is no more block_ioctl() in
> fops.c, should be fine

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the feedback, we'll take a look.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

> 
> 
>> [cannot apply to axboe-block/for-next next-20211013]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pavel-Begunkov/on-top-of-for-5-16-block/20211013-165953 
>>
>> base:    64570fbc14f8d7cb3fe3995f20e26bc25ce4b2cc
>> config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20211013 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 
>> b6a8c695542b2987eb9a203d5663a0740cb4725f)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>          wget 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross 
>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # 
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9e538de87cc869bd26a3ca78da49d1437ec8688c 
>>
>>          git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
>> Pavel-Begunkov/on-top-of-for-5-16-block/20211013-165953
>>          git checkout 9e538de87cc869bd26a3ca78da49d1437ec8688c
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross 
>> W=1 ARCH=hexagon
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> block/fops.c:460:37: error: implicit declaration of function 
>>>> 'bdev_file_inode' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>             struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>>                                                ^
>>     block/fops.c:460:37: note: did you mean 'file_inode'?
>>     include/linux/fs.h:1348:29: note: 'file_inode' declared here
>>     static inline struct inode *file_inode(const struct file *f)
>>                                 ^
>>>> block/fops.c:460:37: warning: incompatible integer to pointer 
>>>> conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'struct inode *' 
>>>> [-Wint-conversion]
>>             struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>>                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>     include/linux/blkdev.h:1990:57: note: passing argument to 
>> parameter 'inode' here
>>     static inline struct block_device *I_BDEV(struct inode *inode)
>>                                                             ^
>>     1 warning and 1 error generated.
>>
>>
>> vim +/bdev_file_inode +460 block/fops.c
>>
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  457
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  458  static long 
>> block_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  459  {
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07 @460      struct 
>> block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file));
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  461      fmode_t mode = 
>> file->f_mode;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  462
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  463      /*
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  464       * O_NDELAY can 
>> be altered using fcntl(.., F_SETFL, ..), so we have
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  465       * to updated it 
>> before every ioctl.
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  466       */
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  467      if 
>> (file->f_flags & O_NDELAY)
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  468          mode |= 
>> FMODE_NDELAY;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  469      else
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  470          mode &= 
>> ~FMODE_NDELAY;
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  471
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  472      return 
>> blkdev_ioctl(bdev, mode, cmd, arg);
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  473  }
>> cd82cca7ebfe9c Christoph Hellwig 2021-09-07  474
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13  8:57 [PATCH v2 0/3] on top of for-5.16/block Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: cache bdev in struct file for raw bdev IO Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: don't hide inode from block_device users Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 14:03   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 14:03     ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 15:03   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 15:03     ` kernel test robot
2021-10-13 15:12     ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:12       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-15  0:40       ` Chen, Rong A [this message]
2021-10-15  0:40         ` Chen, Rong A
2021-10-13 15:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 18:44     ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-14  4:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14  9:35         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13  8:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] blk-mq: optimise *end_request non-stat path Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] on top of for-5.16/block Pavel Begunkov
2021-10-13 15:53 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46559402-1d69-455d-ad09-27f43f6c0a3a@intel.com \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.