All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yezengruan <yezengruan@huawei.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	<james.morse@arm.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <steven.price@arm.com>,
	<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add interface to support VCPU preempted check
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:52:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47879233-4437-4166-b61a-2d1cc8e7e44b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912270236.nkxsDrid%lkp@intel.com>

Hi,

On 2019/12/27 2:51, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Zengruan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
> [also build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next linus/master v5.5-rc3 next-20191220]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zengruan-Ye/KVM-arm64-VCPU-preempted-check-support/20191227-000637
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git next
> config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:89:0,
>                     from include/linux/radix-tree.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/idr.h:15,
>                     from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
>                     from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
>                     from include/linux/of.h:17,
>                     from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
>                     from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
>                     from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
>                     from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
>                     from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>    arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h: In function 'vcpu_is_preempted':
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h:18:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pv_vcpu_is_preempted'; did you mean 'vcpu_is_preempted'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             vcpu_is_preempted
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>    27 real  5 user  7 sys  48.63% cpu 	make prepare
> 
> vim +18 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> 
>     14	
>     15	#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>     16	static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
>     17	{
>   > 18		return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>     19	}
>     20	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
> 

Thanks for posting this, I'll update the code to fix this issue.

Thanks,

Zengruan


---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 45ff1b2949a6..b5d1982414c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@
 /* See include/linux/spinlock.h */
 #define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	smp_mb()

+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
 static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 {
 	return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
 }
+#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT

 #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
2.19.1





WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yezengruan <yezengruan@huawei.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	steven.price@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add interface to support VCPU preempted check
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:52:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47879233-4437-4166-b61a-2d1cc8e7e44b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912270236.nkxsDrid%lkp@intel.com>

Hi,

On 2019/12/27 2:51, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Zengruan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
> [also build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next linus/master v5.5-rc3 next-20191220]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zengruan-Ye/KVM-arm64-VCPU-preempted-check-support/20191227-000637
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git next
> config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:89:0,
>                     from include/linux/radix-tree.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/idr.h:15,
>                     from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
>                     from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
>                     from include/linux/of.h:17,
>                     from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
>                     from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
>                     from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
>                     from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
>                     from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>    arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h: In function 'vcpu_is_preempted':
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h:18:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pv_vcpu_is_preempted'; did you mean 'vcpu_is_preempted'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             vcpu_is_preempted
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>    27 real  5 user  7 sys  48.63% cpu 	make prepare
> 
> vim +18 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> 
>     14	
>     15	#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>     16	static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
>     17	{
>   > 18		return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>     19	}
>     20	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
> 

Thanks for posting this, I'll update the code to fix this issue.

Thanks,

Zengruan


---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 45ff1b2949a6..b5d1982414c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@
 /* See include/linux/spinlock.h */
 #define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	smp_mb()

+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
 static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 {
 	return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
 }
+#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT

 #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
2.19.1




_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yezengruan <yezengruan@huawei.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, steven.price@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add interface to support VCPU preempted check
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:52:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47879233-4437-4166-b61a-2d1cc8e7e44b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912270236.nkxsDrid%lkp@intel.com>

Hi,

On 2019/12/27 2:51, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Zengruan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
> [also build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next linus/master v5.5-rc3 next-20191220]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zengruan-Ye/KVM-arm64-VCPU-preempted-check-support/20191227-000637
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git next
> config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:89:0,
>                     from include/linux/radix-tree.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/idr.h:15,
>                     from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
>                     from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
>                     from include/linux/of.h:17,
>                     from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
>                     from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
>                     from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
>                     from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
>                     from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>    arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h: In function 'vcpu_is_preempted':
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h:18:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pv_vcpu_is_preempted'; did you mean 'vcpu_is_preempted'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             vcpu_is_preempted
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>    27 real  5 user  7 sys  48.63% cpu 	make prepare
> 
> vim +18 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> 
>     14	
>     15	#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>     16	static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
>     17	{
>   > 18		return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>     19	}
>     20	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
> 

Thanks for posting this, I'll update the code to fix this issue.

Thanks,

Zengruan


---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 45ff1b2949a6..b5d1982414c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@
 /* See include/linux/spinlock.h */
 #define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	smp_mb()

+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
 static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 {
 	return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
 }
+#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT

 #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
2.19.1





_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: yezengruan <yezengruan@huawei.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add interface to support VCPU preempted check
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:52:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47879233-4437-4166-b61a-2d1cc8e7e44b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912270236.nkxsDrid%lkp@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3887 bytes --]

Hi,

On 2019/12/27 2:51, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Zengruan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on kvmarm/next]
> [also build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next linus/master v5.5-rc3 next-20191220]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Zengruan-Ye/KVM-arm64-VCPU-preempted-check-support/20191227-000637
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git next
> config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:89:0,
>                     from include/linux/radix-tree.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/idr.h:15,
>                     from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
>                     from include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
>                     from include/linux/kobject.h:20,
>                     from include/linux/of.h:17,
>                     from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
>                     from include/linux/acpi.h:13,
>                     from include/acpi/apei.h:9,
>                     from include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
>                     from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
>    arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h: In function 'vcpu_is_preempted':
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h:18:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pv_vcpu_is_preempted'; did you mean 'vcpu_is_preempted'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             vcpu_is_preempted
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>    make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>    make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>    make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
>    make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
>    make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>    27 real  5 user  7 sys  48.63% cpu 	make prepare
> 
> vim +18 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> 
>     14	
>     15	#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>     16	static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
>     17	{
>   > 18		return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
>     19	}
>     20	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org Intel Corporation
> 

Thanks for posting this, I'll update the code to fix this issue.

Thanks,

Zengruan


---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 45ff1b2949a6..b5d1982414c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@
 /* See include/linux/spinlock.h */
 #define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	smp_mb()

+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
 #define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
 static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(long cpu)
 {
 	return pv_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
 }
+#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT

 #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */
-- 
2.19.1




  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-27  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-26 13:58 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: VCPU preempted check support Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2020-01-09 14:53   ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 14:53     ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 14:53     ` Steven Price
2020-01-11  6:51     ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  6:51       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  6:51       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  6:51       ` yezengruan
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: Add SMCCC paravirtualised lock calls Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Support pvlock preempted via shared structure Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2020-01-09 15:02   ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 15:02     ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 15:02     ` Steven Price
2020-01-11  7:30     ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:30       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:30       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:30       ` yezengruan
2020-01-13 10:31       ` Steven Price
2020-01-13 10:31         ` Steven Price
2020-01-13 10:31         ` Steven Price
2020-01-13 10:31         ` Steven Price
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for PV lock Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Add interface to support VCPU preempted check Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 18:51   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-26 18:51     ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-26 18:51     ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-26 18:51     ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-27  6:52     ` yezengruan
2019-12-27  6:52     ` yezengruan [this message]
2019-12-27  6:52       ` yezengruan
2019-12-27  6:52       ` yezengruan
2019-12-27  6:52       ` yezengruan
2019-12-26 18:51   ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: arm64: Support the VCPU preemption check Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2019-12-26 13:58   ` Zengruan Ye
2020-01-09 15:09   ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 15:09     ` Steven Price
2020-01-09 15:09     ` Steven Price
2020-01-11  7:33     ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:33       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:33       ` yezengruan
2020-01-11  7:33       ` yezengruan
2019-12-26 13:58 ` Zengruan Ye
2020-01-13 12:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: VCPU preempted check support Will Deacon
2020-01-13 12:12   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-13 12:12   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-13 12:12   ` Will Deacon
2020-01-15 14:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-15 14:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-15 14:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-01-15 14:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-12-16  8:45     ` yezengruan
2020-12-16  8:45       ` yezengruan
2020-12-29  8:50     ` yezengruan
2020-12-29  8:50       ` yezengruan
2020-12-29  8:50       ` yezengruan
2020-12-29  8:50       ` yezengruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47879233-4437-4166-b61a-2d1cc8e7e44b@huawei.com \
    --to=yezengruan@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.